Citanul Woodreaders
Played in 173 Green decks
1530+41+1+2+1+3+2+
Color Identity Spread
16.8% Green
Commanders
Seton, Krosan Protector 4.8% of decks
Seton, Krosan Protector 4.8% of decks
Medusa, Inhuman Queen 6.0% of decks
Medusa, Inhuman Queen 6.0% of decks
Torgal, A Fine Hound 1.7% of decks
Torgal, A Fine Hound 1.7% of decks
Kogla, the Titan Ape 2.5% of decks
Kogla, the Titan Ape 2.5% of decks
Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // The Prismatic Piper 100.0% of decks
Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // The Prismatic Piper 100.0% of decks
Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary 4.7% of decks
Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary 4.7% of decks
Most Relevant
Yavimaya Elder 23.1% of decks
Yavimaya Elder 23.1% of decks
Llanowar Visionary 24.9% of decks
Llanowar Visionary 24.9% of decks
Gilt-Leaf Archdruid 16.2% of decks
Gilt-Leaf Archdruid 16.2% of decks
Deeproot Historian 11.0% of decks
Deeproot Historian 11.0% of decks
Elvish Pioneer 16.8% of decks
Elvish Pioneer 16.8% of decks
Borderland Ranger 11.6% of decks
Borderland Ranger 11.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (15)
- Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 2.62 · 4.8% (30 of 622 decks)
- Medusa, Inhuman Queen relevance 1.56 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Torgal, A Fine Hound relevance 1.42 · 1.7% (11 of 649 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 1.41 · 2.5% (8 of 321 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // The Prismatic Piper relevance 0.92 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary relevance 0.83 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Iwamori of the Open Fist relevance 0.69 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.67 · 2.1% (2 of 96 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.58 · 1.3% (2 of 154 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.56 · 1.2% (2 of 164 decks)
- Mister Hyde, Monster Within relevance 0.56 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.50 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.47 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Syr Faren, the Hengehammer relevance 0.40 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Skanos Dragonheart // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.36 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.89 · 23.1% (40 of 173 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.84 · 24.9% (43 of 173 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Archdruid relevance 0.82 · 16.2% (28 of 173 decks)
- Deeproot Historian relevance 0.73 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 0.71 · 16.8% (29 of 173 decks)
- Borderland Ranger relevance 0.70 · 11.6% (20 of 173 decks)
- Druid Lyrist relevance 0.67 · 11.6% (20 of 173 decks)
- Deepwood Denizen relevance 0.65 · 15.0% (26 of 173 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.64 · 20.2% (35 of 173 decks)
- Bequeathal relevance 0.62 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.60 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.59 · 17.3% (30 of 173 decks)
- Champion of Dusan relevance 0.59 · 9.8% (17 of 173 decks)
- Drumhunter relevance 0.58 · 12.7% (22 of 173 decks)
- Paragon of Eternal Wilds relevance 0.57 · 10.4% (18 of 173 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.57 · 12.1% (21 of 173 decks)
- Entourage of Trest relevance 0.53 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Civic Wayfinder relevance 0.53 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Voice of Many relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.52 · 23.1% (40 of 173 decks)
- Krosan Restorer relevance 0.52 · 10.4% (18 of 173 decks)
- Beastbond Outcaster relevance 0.51 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Timberland Guide relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (13 of 173 decks)
- Sarulf's Packmate relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (13 of 173 decks)
- Druid of Purification relevance 0.50 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Voyaging Satyr relevance 0.50 · 10.4% (18 of 173 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.50 · 31.8% (55 of 173 decks)
- Owlbear Shepherd relevance 0.50 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.49 · 19.1% (33 of 173 decks)
All creatures (41)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.89 · 23.1% (40 of 173 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.84 · 24.9% (43 of 173 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Archdruid relevance 0.82 · 16.2% (28 of 173 decks)
- Deeproot Historian relevance 0.73 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 0.71 · 16.8% (29 of 173 decks)
- Borderland Ranger relevance 0.70 · 11.6% (20 of 173 decks)
- Druid Lyrist relevance 0.67 · 11.6% (20 of 173 decks)
- Deepwood Denizen relevance 0.65 · 15.0% (26 of 173 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.64 · 20.2% (35 of 173 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.60 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.59 · 17.3% (30 of 173 decks)
- Champion of Dusan relevance 0.59 · 9.8% (17 of 173 decks)
- Drumhunter relevance 0.58 · 12.7% (22 of 173 decks)
- Paragon of Eternal Wilds relevance 0.57 · 10.4% (18 of 173 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.57 · 12.1% (21 of 173 decks)
- Entourage of Trest relevance 0.53 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Civic Wayfinder relevance 0.53 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Voice of Many relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.52 · 23.1% (40 of 173 decks)
- Krosan Restorer relevance 0.52 · 10.4% (18 of 173 decks)
- Beastbond Outcaster relevance 0.51 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Timberland Guide relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (13 of 173 decks)
- Sarulf's Packmate relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (13 of 173 decks)
- Druid of Purification relevance 0.50 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Voyaging Satyr relevance 0.50 · 10.4% (18 of 173 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.50 · 31.8% (55 of 173 decks)
- Owlbear Shepherd relevance 0.50 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.49 · 19.1% (33 of 173 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 0.49 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.49 · 21.4% (37 of 173 decks)
- Crowned Ceratok relevance 0.48 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Ainok Wayfarer relevance 0.47 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Ferocious Pup relevance 0.47 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Earthshaker Giant relevance 0.47 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Elvish Regrower relevance 0.46 · 10.4% (18 of 173 decks)
- Heart Warden relevance 0.46 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Krosan Wayfarer relevance 0.46 · 9.8% (17 of 173 decks)
- Abzan Beastmaster relevance 0.45 · 9.2% (16 of 173 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.45 · 16.8% (29 of 173 decks)
- Elturgard Ranger relevance 0.44 · 6.4% (11 of 173 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Bonder's Ornament relevance 0.47 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Bequeathal relevance 0.62 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Talons of Wildwood relevance 0.47 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
All instants (1)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.48 · 11.6% (20 of 173 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Lead the Stampede relevance 0.49 · 9.8% (17 of 173 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.47 · 11.6% (20 of 173 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.47 · 28.3% (49 of 173 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.49 · 13.3% (23 of 173 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.48 · 11.6% (20 of 173 decks)
EDH data for Citanul Woodreaders: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 173 real decks.



































