Traumatic Visions
Played in 180 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (11)
- Atemsis, All-Seeing relevance 1.50 · 1.8% (14 of 768 decks)
- Clan Crafter // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher relevance 0.89 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Clan Crafter // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.67 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.55 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Tromokratis relevance 0.51 · 1.1% (2 of 177 decks)
- Vision, Spectral Synthezoid relevance 0.50 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Renet, Temporal Apprentice relevance 0.46 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Cloudhoof Kirin relevance 0.37 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Jetfire, Ingenious Scientist // Jetfire, Air Guardian relevance 0.34 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Alirios, Enraptured relevance 0.32 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.31 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mental Journey relevance 1.92 · 31.1% (56 of 180 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 0.81 · 14.4% (26 of 180 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.79 · 30.0% (54 of 180 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.78 · 23.9% (43 of 180 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.63 · 11.1% (20 of 180 decks)
- Neutralize relevance 0.61 · 12.8% (23 of 180 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 0.53 · 11.7% (21 of 180 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.53 · 21.7% (39 of 180 decks)
- Dismissive Denial relevance 0.53 · 7.8% (14 of 180 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.51 · 22.8% (41 of 180 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.48 · 16.7% (30 of 180 decks)
- Hieroglyphic Illumination relevance 0.47 · 8.3% (15 of 180 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 0.46 · 10.0% (18 of 180 decks)
- Insidious Will relevance 0.46 · 10.6% (19 of 180 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (18 of 180 decks)
- Flow of Ideas relevance 0.43 · 12.2% (22 of 180 decks)
- Marauding Brinefang relevance 0.43 · 6.7% (12 of 180 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.42 · 10.6% (19 of 180 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.42 · 16.1% (29 of 180 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.41 · 12.8% (23 of 180 decks)
- Choking Tethers relevance 0.41 · 6.1% (11 of 180 decks)
- School Daze relevance 0.40 · 7.8% (14 of 180 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.40 · 8.9% (16 of 180 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.40 · 18.3% (33 of 180 decks)
- Daggermaw Megalodon relevance 0.40 · 6.7% (12 of 180 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 0.38 · 7.2% (13 of 180 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.38 · 25.0% (45 of 180 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.37 · 14.4% (26 of 180 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.37 · 12.2% (22 of 180 decks)
- Guile relevance 0.37 · 8.9% (16 of 180 decks)
All creatures (7)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 0.46 · 10.0% (18 of 180 decks)
- Marauding Brinefang relevance 0.43 · 6.7% (12 of 180 decks)
- Daggermaw Megalodon relevance 0.40 · 6.7% (12 of 180 decks)
- Guile relevance 0.37 · 8.9% (16 of 180 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.34 · 13.3% (24 of 180 decks)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 0.34 · 11.7% (21 of 180 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.34 · 15.6% (28 of 180 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.36 · 21.1% (38 of 180 decks)
- Sorcerer's Wand relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (11 of 180 decks)
All instants (24)
- Mental Journey relevance 1.92 · 31.1% (56 of 180 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 0.81 · 14.4% (26 of 180 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.78 · 23.9% (43 of 180 decks)
- Neutralize relevance 0.61 · 12.8% (23 of 180 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 0.53 · 11.7% (21 of 180 decks)
- Dismissive Denial relevance 0.53 · 7.8% (14 of 180 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.51 · 22.8% (41 of 180 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.48 · 16.7% (30 of 180 decks)
- Hieroglyphic Illumination relevance 0.47 · 8.3% (15 of 180 decks)
- Insidious Will relevance 0.46 · 10.6% (19 of 180 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.42 · 10.6% (19 of 180 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.42 · 16.1% (29 of 180 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.41 · 12.8% (23 of 180 decks)
- Choking Tethers relevance 0.41 · 6.1% (11 of 180 decks)
- School Daze relevance 0.40 · 7.8% (14 of 180 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.40 · 8.9% (16 of 180 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.40 · 18.3% (33 of 180 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 0.38 · 7.2% (13 of 180 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.38 · 25.0% (45 of 180 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.37 · 14.4% (26 of 180 decks)
- Censor relevance 0.36 · 6.7% (12 of 180 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.36 · 11.1% (20 of 180 decks)
- Complicate relevance 0.35 · 5.6% (10 of 180 decks)
- Convolute relevance 0.35 · 6.7% (12 of 180 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.79 · 30.0% (54 of 180 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.63 · 11.1% (20 of 180 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.53 · 21.7% (39 of 180 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (18 of 180 decks)
- Flow of Ideas relevance 0.43 · 12.2% (22 of 180 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.37 · 12.2% (22 of 180 decks)
- Wisdom of Ages relevance 0.34 · 9.4% (17 of 180 decks)
All utility lands (10)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.55 · 18.3% (33 of 180 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.50 · 23.9% (43 of 180 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.49 · 13.3% (24 of 180 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.49 · 15.6% (28 of 180 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.48 · 16.1% (29 of 180 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (18 of 180 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.41 · 25.0% (45 of 180 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.41 · 16.1% (29 of 180 decks)
- Memorial to Genius relevance 0.38 · 8.3% (15 of 180 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.35 · 17.8% (32 of 180 decks)
EDH data for Traumatic Visions: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 180 real decks.