Elven Ambush
Played in 3,866 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
10.6% Green
All commanders (30)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 4.02 · 34.2% (1,453 of 4,247 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 3.58 · 79.9% (159 of 199 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 3.37 · 33.8% (463 of 1,371 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 3.23 · 46.5% (204 of 439 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 3.20 · 30.0% (425 of 1,415 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.65 · 16.5% (514 of 3,116 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 2.02 · 27.3% (51 of 187 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.87 · 12.0% (153 of 1,278 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 1.74 · 14.7% (72 of 491 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 1.69 · 27.4% (26 of 95 decks)
- Tyvar, the Pummeler relevance 1.47 · 12.8% (46 of 359 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Master Chef relevance 1.07 · 16.9% (11 of 65 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 1.01 · 28.6% (6 of 21 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.92 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 0.74 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.73 · 30.0% (3 of 10 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.62 · 8.7% (6 of 69 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.57 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.49 · 2.4% (24 of 1,002 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.45 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Hardy Outlander relevance 0.43 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.37 · 1.9% (16 of 838 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.34 · 2.3% (9 of 391 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Sosuke, Son of Seshiro relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.23 · 1.7% (6 of 348 decks)
- Galion, Elvenking's Butler relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Tromell, Seymour's Butler relevance 0.20 · 1.4% (6 of 439 decks)
- Glissa Sunseeker relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (2 of 66 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 2.67 · 68.2% (2,635 of 3,866 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 2.60 · 81.9% (3,165 of 3,866 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 2.58 · 74.7% (2,888 of 3,866 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 2.52 · 74.8% (2,891 of 3,866 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 2.47 · 79.4% (3,068 of 3,866 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.42 · 95.4% (3,688 of 3,866 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 2.21 · 60.6% (2,341 of 3,866 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 2.12 · 58.3% (2,255 of 3,866 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 2.11 · 58.1% (2,247 of 3,866 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 2.06 · 90.7% (3,507 of 3,866 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 2.05 · 56.4% (2,180 of 3,866 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 2.02 · 59.5% (2,300 of 3,866 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.93 · 51.5% (1,991 of 3,866 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.87 · 49.2% (1,904 of 3,866 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 1.81 · 49.0% (1,895 of 3,866 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.81 · 49.5% (1,913 of 3,866 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 1.79 · 47.1% (1,819 of 3,866 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 1.72 · 42.6% (1,648 of 3,866 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.72 · 47.5% (1,836 of 3,866 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.70 · 49.2% (1,901 of 3,866 decks)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 1.65 · 41.8% (1,616 of 3,866 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.65 · 52.3% (2,020 of 3,866 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 1.54 · 35.7% (1,379 of 3,866 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.48 · 46.9% (1,813 of 3,866 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.38 · 66.4% (2,567 of 3,866 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 1.33 · 37.6% (1,455 of 3,866 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.26 · 32.7% (1,265 of 3,866 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.23 · 68.2% (2,636 of 3,866 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.22 · 40.1% (1,549 of 3,866 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.20 · 41.4% (1,602 of 3,866 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 2.60 · 81.9% (3,165 of 3,866 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 2.58 · 74.7% (2,888 of 3,866 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 2.52 · 74.8% (2,891 of 3,866 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 2.47 · 79.4% (3,068 of 3,866 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.42 · 95.4% (3,688 of 3,866 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 2.21 · 60.6% (2,341 of 3,866 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 2.12 · 58.3% (2,255 of 3,866 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 2.11 · 58.1% (2,247 of 3,866 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 2.06 · 90.7% (3,507 of 3,866 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 2.05 · 56.4% (2,180 of 3,866 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 2.02 · 59.5% (2,300 of 3,866 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.93 · 51.5% (1,991 of 3,866 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.87 · 49.2% (1,904 of 3,866 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.81 · 49.5% (1,913 of 3,866 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 1.79 · 47.1% (1,819 of 3,866 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 1.72 · 42.6% (1,648 of 3,866 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.72 · 47.5% (1,836 of 3,866 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.70 · 49.2% (1,901 of 3,866 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.65 · 52.3% (2,020 of 3,866 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 1.54 · 35.7% (1,379 of 3,866 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.48 · 46.9% (1,813 of 3,866 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.38 · 66.4% (2,567 of 3,866 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.26 · 32.7% (1,265 of 3,866 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.23 · 68.2% (2,636 of 3,866 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.22 · 40.1% (1,549 of 3,866 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.20 · 41.4% (1,602 of 3,866 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 1.18 · 30.9% (1,193 of 3,866 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 1.16 · 29.9% (1,157 of 3,866 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 1.13 · 50.2% (1,939 of 3,866 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.07 · 25.6% (989 of 3,866 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 1.06 · 30.3% (1,173 of 3,866 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.05 · 82.7% (3,196 of 3,866 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.04 · 43.9% (1,699 of 3,866 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 1.01 · 30.2% (1,167 of 3,866 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.01 · 40.3% (1,558 of 3,866 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 0.97 · 20.9% (808 of 3,866 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.92 · 58.1% (2,246 of 3,866 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.90 · 23.6% (911 of 3,866 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.89 · 73.6% (2,844 of 3,866 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.88 · 28.3% (1,093 of 3,866 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.88 · 33.7% (1,302 of 3,866 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.87 · 25.6% (989 of 3,866 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.97 · 28.5% (1,103 of 3,866 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.94 · 33.0% (1,274 of 3,866 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 1.65 · 41.8% (1,616 of 3,866 decks)
All instants (2)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 1.81 · 49.0% (1,895 of 3,866 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.94 · 28.4% (1,099 of 3,866 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 2.67 · 68.2% (2,635 of 3,866 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 1.33 · 37.6% (1,455 of 3,866 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 1.66 · 57.9% (2,238 of 3,866 decks)
EDH data for Elven Ambush: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 3,866 real decks.