Elven Ambush
Played in 4,994 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
13.7% Sultai
All commanders (5)
- Maralen, Fae Ascendant relevance 3.10 · 14.0% (3,805 of 27,241 decks)
- Thranduil, the Elvenking relevance 2.14 · 8.9% (1,119 of 12,607 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 1.25 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 1.11 · 17.3% (14 of 81 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel relevance 0.11 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.85 · 46.3% (2,313 of 4,994 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.84 · 74.9% (3,739 of 4,994 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.83 · 80.2% (4,007 of 4,994 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 1.82 · 77.9% (3,889 of 4,994 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.77 · 64.6% (3,225 of 4,994 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.77 · 78.3% (3,910 of 4,994 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.71 · 48.9% (2,443 of 4,994 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 1.70 · 55.0% (2,746 of 4,994 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.58 · 57.7% (2,882 of 4,994 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 1.54 · 43.2% (2,159 of 4,994 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.46 · 62.5% (3,123 of 4,994 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 1.39 · 52.1% (2,600 of 4,994 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.34 · 47.7% (2,384 of 4,994 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.28 · 72.4% (3,615 of 4,994 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 1.27 · 48.1% (2,401 of 4,994 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.23 · 37.8% (1,886 of 4,994 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.21 · 82.7% (4,132 of 4,994 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 1.17 · 50.3% (2,511 of 4,994 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 1.16 · 43.9% (2,192 of 4,994 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.14 · 35.8% (1,788 of 4,994 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 1.12 · 41.4% (2,069 of 4,994 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.10 · 33.6% (1,677 of 4,994 decks)
- Urborg Elf relevance 1.07 · 35.5% (1,771 of 4,994 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 1.06 · 34.6% (1,726 of 4,994 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.05 · 44.5% (2,221 of 4,994 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 1.03 · 36.0% (1,796 of 4,994 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.03 · 28.6% (1,426 of 4,994 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 1.01 · 44.1% (2,203 of 4,994 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.01 · 45.8% (2,287 of 4,994 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 1.00 · 35.7% (1,781 of 4,994 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.84 · 74.9% (3,739 of 4,994 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.83 · 80.2% (4,007 of 4,994 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 1.82 · 77.9% (3,889 of 4,994 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.77 · 64.6% (3,225 of 4,994 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.77 · 78.3% (3,910 of 4,994 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.71 · 48.9% (2,443 of 4,994 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.58 · 57.7% (2,882 of 4,994 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 1.54 · 43.2% (2,159 of 4,994 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.46 · 62.5% (3,123 of 4,994 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 1.39 · 52.1% (2,600 of 4,994 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.34 · 47.7% (2,384 of 4,994 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.28 · 72.4% (3,615 of 4,994 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 1.27 · 48.1% (2,401 of 4,994 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.23 · 37.8% (1,886 of 4,994 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.21 · 82.7% (4,132 of 4,994 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 1.17 · 50.3% (2,511 of 4,994 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 1.16 · 43.9% (2,192 of 4,994 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.14 · 35.8% (1,788 of 4,994 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.10 · 33.6% (1,677 of 4,994 decks)
- Urborg Elf relevance 1.07 · 35.5% (1,771 of 4,994 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 1.06 · 34.6% (1,726 of 4,994 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.05 · 44.5% (2,221 of 4,994 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 1.03 · 36.0% (1,796 of 4,994 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.03 · 28.6% (1,426 of 4,994 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 1.01 · 44.1% (2,203 of 4,994 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.01 · 45.8% (2,287 of 4,994 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 1.00 · 35.7% (1,781 of 4,994 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.96 · 29.6% (1,480 of 4,994 decks)
- Oona, Queen of the Fae relevance 0.92 · 29.7% (1,482 of 4,994 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.91 · 27.5% (1,375 of 4,994 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.91 · 30.7% (1,533 of 4,994 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.89 · 29.5% (1,472 of 4,994 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.89 · 30.1% (1,505 of 4,994 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.88 · 49.8% (2,487 of 4,994 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.87 · 27.1% (1,355 of 4,994 decks)
- Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor relevance 0.82 · 26.4% (1,319 of 4,994 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.82 · 29.9% (1,493 of 4,994 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Bitterblossom relevance 1.12 · 41.4% (2,069 of 4,994 decks)
- Prowess of the Fair relevance 0.96 · 21.7% (1,084 of 4,994 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.92 · 34.5% (1,723 of 4,994 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.92 · 32.5% (1,623 of 4,994 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.89 · 32.0% (1,599 of 4,994 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.83 · 23.3% (1,166 of 4,994 decks)
All instants (3)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 1.70 · 55.0% (2,746 of 4,994 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.97 · 34.5% (1,724 of 4,994 decks)
- Spell Stutter relevance 0.82 · 25.5% (1,272 of 4,994 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.85 · 46.3% (2,313 of 4,994 decks)
- Trystan's Command relevance 0.83 · 24.0% (1,197 of 4,994 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tyvar Kell relevance 0.96 · 23.9% (1,196 of 4,994 decks)
All lands (1)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.86 · 28.5% (1,423 of 4,994 decks)
EDH data for Elven Ambush: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 4,994 real decks.