Constricting Tendrils
Played in 56 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
26.5% Blue
All commanders (4)
- Wasp, Shrinking Savior relevance 0.99 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // The Prismatic Piper relevance 0.96 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Clan Crafter // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.81 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 0.75 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Startling Development relevance 2.09 · 30.4% (17 of 56 decks)
- Dazzling Lights relevance 1.72 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 1.62 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Chain to Memory relevance 1.60 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 1.60 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Censor relevance 1.56 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Rescind relevance 1.47 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Chilling Trap relevance 1.43 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 1.39 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
- Choking Tethers relevance 1.30 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Scrounging Skyray relevance 1.23 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Trade the Helm relevance 1.21 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Hieroglyphic Illumination relevance 1.21 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Rebuild relevance 1.20 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Curator of Mysteries relevance 1.15 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Stall Out relevance 1.14 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Miscalculation relevance 1.12 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Neutralize relevance 1.10 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Mage's Guile relevance 1.05 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Complicate relevance 0.91 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.88 · 30.4% (17 of 56 decks)
- Aspirant's Ascent relevance 0.88 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Waxen Shapethief relevance 0.82 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Blustersquall relevance 0.77 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 0.73 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 0.68 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.66 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.65 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.64 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Defy Gravity relevance 0.63 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
All creatures (7)
- Scrounging Skyray relevance 1.23 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Curator of Mysteries relevance 1.15 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Waxen Shapethief relevance 0.82 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.65 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.53 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.51 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.33 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.37 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.61 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
All instants (27)
- Startling Development relevance 2.09 · 30.4% (17 of 56 decks)
- Dazzling Lights relevance 1.72 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
- Chain to Memory relevance 1.60 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 1.60 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Censor relevance 1.56 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Rescind relevance 1.47 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Chilling Trap relevance 1.43 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Choking Tethers relevance 1.30 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Hieroglyphic Illumination relevance 1.21 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Rebuild relevance 1.20 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Miscalculation relevance 1.12 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Neutralize relevance 1.10 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Mage's Guile relevance 1.05 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Complicate relevance 0.91 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Aspirant's Ascent relevance 0.88 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Blustersquall relevance 0.77 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 0.73 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.66 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.64 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Defy Gravity relevance 0.63 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Dream's Grip relevance 0.63 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.62 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.59 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.59 · 39.3% (22 of 56 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.55 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.52 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.51 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 1.62 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 1.39 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
- Trade the Helm relevance 1.21 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Stall Out relevance 1.14 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.88 · 30.4% (17 of 56 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 0.68 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.58 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.36 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.59 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.56 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.56 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
EDH data for Constricting Tendrils: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 56 real decks.