3030+21+3+2+1+5+1+9+8+
Color Identity Spread
3.3% Simic
-
Naya 23,713 · 15.3%
-
Five-Color 23,367 · 15.1%
-
Golgari 14,142 · 9.2%
-
Sultai 11,474 · 7.4%
-
Red 8,454 · 5.5%
-
Grixis 7,619 · 4.9%
-
Dimir 6,776 · 4.4%
-
Esper 5,949 · 3.9%
-
Jund 5,900 · 3.8%
-
Simic 5,029 · 3.3%
-
Green 4,827 · 3.1%
-
Gruul 4,618 · 3.0%
-
Orzhov 3,341 · 2.2%
-
Boros 3,107 · 2.0%
- Other (18) 26,173 · 16.9%
Commanders
Omo, Queen of Vesuva 30.8% of decks
Omo, Queen of Vesuva 30.8% of decks
Moritte of the Frost 43.2% of decks
Moritte of the Frost 43.2% of decks
Acolyte of Bahamut // Volo, Itinerant Scholar 54.1% of decks
Acolyte of Bahamut // Volo, Itinerant Scholar 54.1% of decks
Grolnok, the Omnivore 19.4% of decks
Grolnok, the Omnivore 19.4% of decks
Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer 48.3% of decks
Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer 48.3% of decks
Gor Muldrak, Amphinologist 12.6% of decks
Gor Muldrak, Amphinologist 12.6% of decks
Most Relevant
Lord of the Unreal 42.0% of decks
Lord of the Unreal 42.0% of decks
Hakbal of the Surging Soul 34.9% of decks
Hakbal of the Surging Soul 34.9% of decks
Timber Protector 26.2% of decks
Timber Protector 26.2% of decks
Baru, Wurmspeaker 24.8% of decks
Baru, Wurmspeaker 24.8% of decks
Herald of Hoofbeats 24.6% of decks
Herald of Hoofbeats 24.6% of decks
Feline Sovereign 23.8% of decks
Feline Sovereign 23.8% of decks
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer
1.27| 34.5%
$31.95 · €31.67$0.29 · €0.18
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 3.93 · 30.8% (2,204 of 7,151 decks)
- Moritte of the Frost relevance 3.24 · 43.2% (295 of 683 decks)
- Acolyte of Bahamut // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 2.85 · 54.1% (105 of 194 decks)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 2.85 · 19.4% (745 of 3,840 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 1.99 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Gor Muldrak, Amphinologist relevance 1.85 · 12.6% (175 of 1,393 decks)
- Clement, the Worrywort relevance 1.45 · 6.4% (286 of 4,485 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 1.27 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Tawnos, the Toymaker relevance 1.16 · 7.6% (62 of 816 decks)
- Genghis Frog relevance 1.05 · 8.3% (35 of 421 decks)
- Mikey & Don, Party Planners relevance 0.80 · 4.8% (38 of 784 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Master Chef relevance 0.78 · 5.2% (30 of 576 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.78 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Korlessa, Scale Singer relevance 0.78 · 6.5% (19 of 292 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Master Chef relevance 0.68 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.60 · 2.3% (90 of 3,961 decks)
- Clara Oswald // The Fourth Doctor relevance 0.54 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.50 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Acolyte of Bahamut // Alora, Merry Thief relevance 0.50 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 0.50 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- The Sixth Doctor // Clara Oswald relevance 0.50 · 5.1% (8 of 157 decks)
- Kaseto, Orochi Archmage relevance 0.49 · 3.4% (15 of 439 decks)
- Kiora, Sovereign of the Deep relevance 0.47 · 1.8% (68 of 3,873 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.45 · 6.1% (5 of 82 decks)
- Radagast, Wizard of Wilds relevance 0.38 · 2.8% (11 of 391 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Shameless Charlatan relevance 0.36 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.36 · 1.3% (63 of 4,887 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.35 · 9.5% (2 of 21 decks)
- Kumena, Tyrant of Orazca relevance 0.33 · 1.3% (38 of 2,821 decks)
- Esior, Wardwing Familiar // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.33 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Lord of the Unreal relevance 1.67 · 42.0% (2,110 of 5,029 decks)
- Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 1.25 · 34.9% (1,755 of 5,029 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 1.20 · 26.2% (1,316 of 5,029 decks)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 1.16 · 24.8% (1,246 of 5,029 decks)
- Herald of Hoofbeats relevance 1.15 · 24.6% (1,235 of 5,029 decks)
- Feline Sovereign relevance 1.13 · 23.8% (1,196 of 5,029 decks)
- Aven Courier relevance 1.11 · 25.1% (1,262 of 5,029 decks)
- Galerider Sliver relevance 1.10 · 23.4% (1,176 of 5,029 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 1.07 · 29.0% (1,460 of 5,029 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 1.06 · 24.5% (1,234 of 5,029 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.01 · 33.0% (1,658 of 5,029 decks)
- Multiclass Baldric relevance 1.00 · 20.7% (1,039 of 5,029 decks)
- Thrumming Hivepool relevance 0.98 · 20.0% (1,004 of 5,029 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.96 · 31.3% (1,572 of 5,029 decks)
- Pheres-Band Warchief relevance 0.90 · 17.5% (879 of 5,029 decks)
- Sea Gate Loremaster relevance 0.90 · 17.8% (893 of 5,029 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.89 · 24.2% (1,215 of 5,029 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.89 · 24.3% (1,220 of 5,029 decks)
- Harabaz Druid relevance 0.87 · 17.1% (858 of 5,029 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.86 · 34.5% (1,733 of 5,029 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.84 · 26.7% (1,342 of 5,029 decks)
- March from Velis Vel relevance 0.83 · 20.1% (1,013 of 5,029 decks)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 0.83 · 17.8% (894 of 5,029 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.81 · 16.0% (807 of 5,029 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.77 · 23.4% (1,178 of 5,029 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 0.77 · 20.7% (1,043 of 5,029 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.76 · 19.8% (996 of 5,029 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.76 · 14.4% (723 of 5,029 decks)
- Diffusion Sliver relevance 0.73 · 13.9% (701 of 5,029 decks)
- Absorb Identity relevance 0.73 · 13.8% (692 of 5,029 decks)
All creatures (21)
- Lord of the Unreal relevance 1.67 · 42.0% (2,110 of 5,029 decks)
- Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 1.25 · 34.9% (1,755 of 5,029 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 1.20 · 26.2% (1,316 of 5,029 decks)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 1.16 · 24.8% (1,246 of 5,029 decks)
- Herald of Hoofbeats relevance 1.15 · 24.6% (1,235 of 5,029 decks)
- Feline Sovereign relevance 1.13 · 23.8% (1,196 of 5,029 decks)
- Aven Courier relevance 1.11 · 25.1% (1,262 of 5,029 decks)
- Galerider Sliver relevance 1.10 · 23.4% (1,176 of 5,029 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 1.07 · 29.0% (1,460 of 5,029 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 1.06 · 24.5% (1,234 of 5,029 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.01 · 33.0% (1,658 of 5,029 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.96 · 31.3% (1,572 of 5,029 decks)
- Pheres-Band Warchief relevance 0.90 · 17.5% (879 of 5,029 decks)
- Sea Gate Loremaster relevance 0.90 · 17.8% (893 of 5,029 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.89 · 24.2% (1,215 of 5,029 decks)
- Harabaz Druid relevance 0.87 · 17.1% (858 of 5,029 decks)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 0.83 · 17.8% (894 of 5,029 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.81 · 16.0% (807 of 5,029 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 0.77 · 20.7% (1,043 of 5,029 decks)
- Diffusion Sliver relevance 0.73 · 13.9% (701 of 5,029 decks)
- Seshiro the Anointed relevance 0.70 · 13.6% (684 of 5,029 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Multiclass Baldric relevance 1.00 · 20.7% (1,039 of 5,029 decks)
- Thrumming Hivepool relevance 0.98 · 20.0% (1,004 of 5,029 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.77 · 23.4% (1,178 of 5,029 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Copy Land relevance 0.76 · 19.8% (996 of 5,029 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.76 · 14.4% (723 of 5,029 decks)
All instants (1)
- Absorb Identity relevance 0.73 · 13.8% (692 of 5,029 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.89 · 24.3% (1,220 of 5,029 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.86 · 34.5% (1,733 of 5,029 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.84 · 26.7% (1,342 of 5,029 decks)
- March from Velis Vel relevance 0.83 · 20.1% (1,013 of 5,029 decks)
- Peer Pressure relevance 0.70 · 14.5% (731 of 5,029 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Oko, Lorwyn Liege // Oko, Shadowmoor Scion relevance 0.70 · 15.6% (786 of 5,029 decks)
All utility lands (9)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 1.18 · 33.0% (1,660 of 5,029 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 1.13 · 29.2% (1,466 of 5,029 decks)
- Swarmyard relevance 1.10 · 24.3% (1,222 of 5,029 decks)
- Glimmerpost relevance 1.08 · 28.9% (1,452 of 5,029 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.07 · 36.4% (1,833 of 5,029 decks)
- Trenchpost relevance 0.87 · 22.3% (1,120 of 5,029 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.78 · 27.3% (1,371 of 5,029 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.75 · 21.8% (1,096 of 5,029 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.74 · 22.4% (1,129 of 5,029 decks)
All lands (8)
- Cloudpost relevance 1.41 · 40.4% (2,031 of 5,029 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 1.31 · 40.7% (2,045 of 5,029 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 1.29 · 39.9% (2,006 of 5,029 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 1.29 · 39.9% (2,005 of 5,029 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 1.25 · 32.3% (1,626 of 5,029 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 1.13 · 36.2% (1,819 of 5,029 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 1.12 · 31.6% (1,589 of 5,029 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.88 · 29.7% (1,493 of 5,029 decks)
EDH data for Maskwood Nexus: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 5,029 real decks.







































































