Godhunter Octopus
Played in 51 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
27.0% Blue
- Blue 51 · 27.0%
- Simic 45 · 23.8%
- Dimir 38 · 20.1%
- Azorius 32 · 16.9%
- Sultai 6 · 3.2%
- Bant 5 · 2.6%
- Other (7) 12 · 6.3%
All commanders (9)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 1.89 · 5.2% (6 of 115 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 1.77 · 3.7% (6 of 162 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 1.28 · 1.3% (5 of 387 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.01 · 3.9% (2 of 51 decks)
- Falcon, Winged Wonder relevance 0.92 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.80 · 1.4% (2 of 141 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.73 · 1.0% (2 of 197 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.73 · 1.0% (2 of 198 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.60 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sealock Monster relevance 2.77 · 41.2% (21 of 51 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 2.36 · 37.3% (19 of 51 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 2.25 · 35.3% (18 of 51 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.83 · 35.3% (18 of 51 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.77 · 31.4% (16 of 51 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 1.57 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.48 · 29.4% (15 of 51 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 1.47 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 1.45 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.41 · 27.5% (14 of 51 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 1.36 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Harbor Serpent relevance 1.35 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 1.30 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 1.22 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.18 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.18 · 33.3% (17 of 51 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 1.16 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Kraken Hatchling relevance 1.15 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Gearseeker Serpent relevance 1.14 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Crush of Tentacles relevance 1.13 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.11 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 1.09 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Coral Barrier relevance 1.04 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Kraken of the Straits relevance 0.99 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.98 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 0.97 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.96 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 0.95 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.93 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.88 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
All creatures (38)
- Sealock Monster relevance 2.77 · 41.2% (21 of 51 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 2.36 · 37.3% (19 of 51 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 2.25 · 35.3% (18 of 51 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.83 · 35.3% (18 of 51 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.77 · 31.4% (16 of 51 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 1.57 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.48 · 29.4% (15 of 51 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 1.47 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 1.45 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.41 · 27.5% (14 of 51 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 1.36 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Harbor Serpent relevance 1.35 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 1.22 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.18 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 1.16 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Kraken Hatchling relevance 1.15 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Gearseeker Serpent relevance 1.14 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.11 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 1.09 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Coral Barrier relevance 1.04 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Kraken of the Straits relevance 0.99 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 0.97 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.96 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 0.95 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.93 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.88 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Shipbreaker Kraken relevance 0.84 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Tolarian Terror relevance 0.84 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Stormsurge Kraken relevance 0.83 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Sigiled Starfish relevance 0.81 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 0.81 · 27.5% (14 of 51 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 0.80 · 25.5% (13 of 51 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.70 · 29.4% (15 of 51 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.67 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.63 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.58 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.52 · 25.5% (13 of 51 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.35 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.41 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.33 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 1.30 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.98 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.36 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.18 · 33.3% (17 of 51 decks)
- Crush of Tentacles relevance 1.13 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.78 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.65 · 25.5% (13 of 51 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.37 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
EDH data for Godhunter Octopus: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 51 real decks.