Hungry Megasloth
Played in 28 Five-Color decks
Color Identity Spread
9.6% Five-Color
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (1)
- Horde of Notions relevance 2.78 · 1.0% (17 of 1,647 decks)
All most relevant (20)
- Grim Giganotosaurus relevance 4.40 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Loot, the Pathfinder relevance 4.17 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 4.02 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 3.96 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Leyline Prowler relevance 3.91 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Torrent Elemental relevance 3.77 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Qiqirn Merchant relevance 3.46 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 3.41 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 3.40 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 3.09 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Catalyst Elemental relevance 3.01 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- The Lion-Turtle relevance 2.76 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Kithkeeper relevance 2.54 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 2.47 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Old Hob, Alleycat Blues relevance 2.10 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 1.82 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Moonglove Changeling relevance 1.80 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 1.55 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Subterfuge relevance 1.51 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Impulsivity relevance 1.17 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Grim Giganotosaurus relevance 4.40 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Loot, the Pathfinder relevance 4.17 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 4.02 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 3.96 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Leyline Prowler relevance 3.91 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Torrent Elemental relevance 3.77 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Qiqirn Merchant relevance 3.46 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 3.41 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 3.40 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 3.09 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Catalyst Elemental relevance 3.01 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- The Lion-Turtle relevance 2.76 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Kithkeeper relevance 2.54 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 2.47 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Old Hob, Alleycat Blues relevance 2.10 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 1.82 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Moonglove Changeling relevance 1.80 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 1.55 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Subterfuge relevance 1.51 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Impulsivity relevance 1.17 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
All utility lands (8)
- Indatha Triome relevance 0.72 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Jetmir's Garden relevance 0.71 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Spara's Headquarters relevance 0.69 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Raugrin Triome relevance 0.67 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Zagoth Triome relevance 0.67 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Ziatora's Proving Ground relevance 0.60 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Ketria Triome relevance 0.60 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- The World Tree relevance 0.56 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
All lands (7)
- Frontier Bivouac relevance 0.59 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Opulent Palace relevance 0.55 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.54 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.51 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.47 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.46 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.42 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
EDH data for Hungry Megasloth: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 28 real decks.