Doorkeeper
Played in 203 Dimir decks
230+32+3+7+1+6+1+
Color Identity Spread
12.7% Dimir
Commanders
Most Relevant
Wall of Frost 68.0% of decks
Wall of Frost 68.0% of decks
Hover Barrier 58.6% of decks
Hover Barrier 58.6% of decks
Glacial Wall 43.8% of decks
Glacial Wall 43.8% of decks
Wall of Lost Thoughts 46.3% of decks
Wall of Lost Thoughts 46.3% of decks
Tree of Perdition 50.7% of decks
Tree of Perdition 50.7% of decks
Charix, the Raging Isle 50.2% of decks
Charix, the Raging Isle 50.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Phenax, God of Deception relevance 3.45 · 3.3% (158 of 4,849 decks)
- Sarevok, Deathbringer // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.68 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wall of Frost relevance 3.03 · 68.0% (138 of 203 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 2.88 · 58.6% (119 of 203 decks)
- Glacial Wall relevance 2.44 · 43.8% (89 of 203 decks)
- Wall of Lost Thoughts relevance 2.36 · 46.3% (94 of 203 decks)
- Tree of Perdition relevance 2.08 · 50.7% (103 of 203 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 2.02 · 50.2% (102 of 203 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 1.85 · 31.0% (63 of 203 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 1.72 · 38.4% (78 of 203 decks)
- Traumatize relevance 1.63 · 53.2% (108 of 203 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.58 · 35.5% (72 of 203 decks)
- Fraying Sanity relevance 1.48 · 45.3% (92 of 203 decks)
- Mnemonic Wall relevance 1.41 · 25.6% (52 of 203 decks)
- Ruin Crab relevance 1.41 · 56.2% (114 of 203 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 1.39 · 22.7% (46 of 203 decks)
- Murmuring Phantasm relevance 1.35 · 19.7% (40 of 203 decks)
- Guard Gomazoa relevance 1.35 · 22.7% (46 of 203 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 1.35 · 44.8% (91 of 203 decks)
- Consuming Aberration relevance 1.33 · 70.9% (144 of 203 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 1.24 · 22.7% (46 of 203 decks)
- Wight of Precinct Six relevance 1.22 · 30.5% (62 of 203 decks)
- Maddening Cacophony relevance 1.22 · 54.2% (110 of 203 decks)
- Psychic Strike relevance 1.21 · 32.5% (66 of 203 decks)
- Mind Grind relevance 1.13 · 36.5% (74 of 203 decks)
- Eater of the Dead relevance 1.11 · 25.6% (52 of 203 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 1.11 · 22.7% (46 of 203 decks)
- Mindcrank relevance 1.09 · 50.7% (103 of 203 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.08 · 22.7% (46 of 203 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 1.08 · 30.0% (61 of 203 decks)
- Bruvac the Grandiloquent relevance 1.07 · 38.4% (78 of 203 decks)
- Wall of Mist relevance 1.06 · 16.3% (33 of 203 decks)
All creatures (32)
- Wall of Frost relevance 3.03 · 68.0% (138 of 203 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 2.88 · 58.6% (119 of 203 decks)
- Glacial Wall relevance 2.44 · 43.8% (89 of 203 decks)
- Wall of Lost Thoughts relevance 2.36 · 46.3% (94 of 203 decks)
- Tree of Perdition relevance 2.08 · 50.7% (103 of 203 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 2.02 · 50.2% (102 of 203 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 1.85 · 31.0% (63 of 203 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 1.72 · 38.4% (78 of 203 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.58 · 35.5% (72 of 203 decks)
- Mnemonic Wall relevance 1.41 · 25.6% (52 of 203 decks)
- Ruin Crab relevance 1.41 · 56.2% (114 of 203 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 1.39 · 22.7% (46 of 203 decks)
- Murmuring Phantasm relevance 1.35 · 19.7% (40 of 203 decks)
- Guard Gomazoa relevance 1.35 · 22.7% (46 of 203 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 1.35 · 44.8% (91 of 203 decks)
- Consuming Aberration relevance 1.33 · 70.9% (144 of 203 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 1.24 · 22.7% (46 of 203 decks)
- Wight of Precinct Six relevance 1.22 · 30.5% (62 of 203 decks)
- Eater of the Dead relevance 1.11 · 25.6% (52 of 203 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 1.11 · 22.7% (46 of 203 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.08 · 22.7% (46 of 203 decks)
- Bruvac the Grandiloquent relevance 1.07 · 38.4% (78 of 203 decks)
- Wall of Mist relevance 1.06 · 16.3% (33 of 203 decks)
- Fleet Swallower relevance 1.05 · 27.6% (56 of 203 decks)
- Duskmantle Guildmage relevance 1.01 · 32.5% (66 of 203 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.97 · 21.7% (44 of 203 decks)
- Cruel Somnophage // Can't Wake Up relevance 0.95 · 31.5% (64 of 203 decks)
- Manic Scribe relevance 0.92 · 19.2% (39 of 203 decks)
- Academy Wall relevance 0.89 · 14.3% (29 of 203 decks)
- Sewer Nemesis relevance 0.84 · 27.1% (55 of 203 decks)
- Mortivore relevance 0.83 · 18.7% (38 of 203 decks)
- Jace's Phantasm relevance 0.82 · 16.7% (34 of 203 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Mindcrank relevance 1.09 · 50.7% (103 of 203 decks)
- Keening Stone relevance 0.94 · 19.7% (40 of 203 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.81 · 18.7% (38 of 203 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Fraying Sanity relevance 1.48 · 45.3% (92 of 203 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 1.08 · 30.0% (61 of 203 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 1.05 · 36.9% (75 of 203 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.94 · 21.7% (44 of 203 decks)
- Court of Cunning relevance 0.87 · 29.6% (60 of 203 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.86 · 18.2% (37 of 203 decks)
- Memory Erosion relevance 0.85 · 25.6% (52 of 203 decks)
All instants (1)
- Psychic Strike relevance 1.21 · 32.5% (66 of 203 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Traumatize relevance 1.63 · 53.2% (108 of 203 decks)
- Maddening Cacophony relevance 1.22 · 54.2% (110 of 203 decks)
- Mind Grind relevance 1.13 · 36.5% (74 of 203 decks)
- Fractured Sanity relevance 1.02 · 41.9% (85 of 203 decks)
- Mind Funeral relevance 0.93 · 24.6% (50 of 203 decks)
- Glimpse the Unthinkable relevance 0.92 · 31.5% (64 of 203 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Nephalia Drownyard relevance 0.79 · 31.0% (63 of 203 decks)
EDH data for Doorkeeper: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 203 real decks.





































