Citanul Centaurs
Played in 71 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
71 decks
Commanders
7
Commanders
7Showing 1-7 of 7
Page size
All commanders (7)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 1.46 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.89 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.87 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.86 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Autumn Willow relevance 0.76 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.75 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 0.66 · 1.2% (1 of 84 decks)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
All most relevant (30)
- Crashing Centaur relevance 2.15 · 18.3% (13 of 71 decks)
- Argothian Wurm relevance 2.14 · 23.9% (17 of 71 decks)
- Centaur Rootcaster relevance 1.99 · 21.1% (15 of 71 decks)
- Jolrael's Centaur relevance 1.96 · 18.3% (13 of 71 decks)
- Centaur Chieftain relevance 1.94 · 18.3% (13 of 71 decks)
- Spellbane Centaur relevance 1.86 · 18.3% (13 of 71 decks)
- Ravaging Riftwurm relevance 1.84 · 21.1% (15 of 71 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 1.78 · 25.4% (18 of 71 decks)
- Pugnacious Hammerskull relevance 1.75 · 29.6% (21 of 71 decks)
- Force of Savagery relevance 1.69 · 21.1% (15 of 71 decks)
- Phantom Centaur relevance 1.68 · 16.9% (12 of 71 decks)
- Gaea's Courser relevance 1.65 · 16.9% (12 of 71 decks)
- Pheres-Band Warchief relevance 1.62 · 19.7% (14 of 71 decks)
- Battlefield Scrounger relevance 1.62 · 15.5% (11 of 71 decks)
- Pheres-Band Raiders relevance 1.61 · 15.5% (11 of 71 decks)
- Pangosaur relevance 1.57 · 16.9% (12 of 71 decks)
- Centaur Omenreader relevance 1.56 · 19.7% (14 of 71 decks)
- Hungry Mist relevance 1.55 · 14.1% (10 of 71 decks)
- Seton's Scout relevance 1.53 · 14.1% (10 of 71 decks)
- Centaur Veteran relevance 1.53 · 12.7% (9 of 71 decks)
- Pheres-Band Tromper relevance 1.51 · 15.5% (11 of 71 decks)
- Centaur Nurturer relevance 1.51 · 16.9% (12 of 71 decks)
- Pheres-Band Brawler relevance 1.48 · 14.1% (10 of 71 decks)
- Krosan Archer relevance 1.47 · 12.7% (9 of 71 decks)
- Bristlebane Battler relevance 1.41 · 22.5% (16 of 71 decks)
- Hunted Troll relevance 1.40 · 19.7% (14 of 71 decks)
- Forcemage Advocate relevance 1.37 · 14.1% (10 of 71 decks)
- Nylea's Disciple relevance 1.37 · 15.5% (11 of 71 decks)
- Groundbreaker relevance 1.35 · 16.9% (12 of 71 decks)
- The Foretold Soldier relevance 1.35 · 19.7% (14 of 71 decks)
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Crashing Centaur relevance 2.15 · 18.3% (13 of 71 decks)
- Argothian Wurm relevance 2.14 · 23.9% (17 of 71 decks)
- Centaur Rootcaster relevance 1.99 · 21.1% (15 of 71 decks)
- Jolrael's Centaur relevance 1.96 · 18.3% (13 of 71 decks)
- Centaur Chieftain relevance 1.94 · 18.3% (13 of 71 decks)
- Spellbane Centaur relevance 1.86 · 18.3% (13 of 71 decks)
- Ravaging Riftwurm relevance 1.84 · 21.1% (15 of 71 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 1.78 · 25.4% (18 of 71 decks)
- Pugnacious Hammerskull relevance 1.75 · 29.6% (21 of 71 decks)
- Force of Savagery relevance 1.69 · 21.1% (15 of 71 decks)
- Phantom Centaur relevance 1.68 · 16.9% (12 of 71 decks)
- Gaea's Courser relevance 1.65 · 16.9% (12 of 71 decks)
- Pheres-Band Warchief relevance 1.62 · 19.7% (14 of 71 decks)
- Battlefield Scrounger relevance 1.62 · 15.5% (11 of 71 decks)
- Pheres-Band Raiders relevance 1.61 · 15.5% (11 of 71 decks)
- Pangosaur relevance 1.57 · 16.9% (12 of 71 decks)
- Centaur Omenreader relevance 1.56 · 19.7% (14 of 71 decks)
- Hungry Mist relevance 1.55 · 14.1% (10 of 71 decks)
- Seton's Scout relevance 1.53 · 14.1% (10 of 71 decks)
- Centaur Veteran relevance 1.53 · 12.7% (9 of 71 decks)
- Pheres-Band Tromper relevance 1.51 · 15.5% (11 of 71 decks)
- Centaur Nurturer relevance 1.51 · 16.9% (12 of 71 decks)
- Pheres-Band Brawler relevance 1.48 · 14.1% (10 of 71 decks)
- Krosan Archer relevance 1.47 · 12.7% (9 of 71 decks)
- Bristlebane Battler relevance 1.41 · 22.5% (16 of 71 decks)
- Hunted Troll relevance 1.40 · 19.7% (14 of 71 decks)
- Forcemage Advocate relevance 1.37 · 14.1% (10 of 71 decks)
- Nylea's Disciple relevance 1.37 · 15.5% (11 of 71 decks)
- Groundbreaker relevance 1.35 · 16.9% (12 of 71 decks)
- The Foretold Soldier relevance 1.35 · 19.7% (14 of 71 decks)
- Krosan Druid relevance 1.33 · 14.1% (10 of 71 decks)
- Wildwood Patrol relevance 1.30 · 12.7% (9 of 71 decks)
- Centaur Safeguard relevance 1.30 · 11.3% (8 of 71 decks)
- Relic Golem relevance 1.30 · 19.7% (14 of 71 decks)
- Skyshooter relevance 1.28 · 14.1% (10 of 71 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 1.27 · 21.1% (15 of 71 decks)
- Phantasmal Dreadmaw relevance 1.27 · 15.5% (11 of 71 decks)
- Anzrag, the Quake-Mole relevance 1.27 · 23.9% (17 of 71 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 1.25 · 33.8% (24 of 71 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 1.22 · 23.9% (17 of 71 decks)
- Inferno Hellion relevance 1.22 · 12.7% (9 of 71 decks)
- Dowsing Shaman relevance 1.16 · 12.7% (9 of 71 decks)
- Temur Battlecrier relevance 1.15 · 23.9% (17 of 71 decks)
- Centaur Battlemaster relevance 1.12 · 11.3% (8 of 71 decks)
- Centaur Vinecrasher relevance 1.11 · 16.9% (12 of 71 decks)
- Loaming Shaman relevance 1.10 · 15.5% (11 of 71 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 1.08 · 22.5% (16 of 71 decks)
- Pharika's Disciple relevance 1.08 · 11.3% (8 of 71 decks)
- Nylea's Huntmaster relevance 1.08 · 11.3% (8 of 71 decks)
- Shivan Wumpus relevance 1.07 · 11.3% (8 of 71 decks)
EDH data for Citanul Centaurs: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 71 real decks.