Tar Fiend
Played in 40 Five-Color decks
30+46+1+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
9.8% Five-Color
Most Relevant
Smokebraider 77.5% of decks
Smokebraider 77.5% of decks
Ashling's Command 55.0% of decks
Ashling's Command 55.0% of decks
Cavalier of Night 42.5% of decks
Cavalier of Night 42.5% of decks
Risen Reef 80.0% of decks
Risen Reef 80.0% of decks
Flamebraider 70.0% of decks
Flamebraider 70.0% of decks
Flamekin Harbinger 52.5% of decks
Flamekin Harbinger 52.5% of decks
All most relevant (30)
- Smokebraider relevance 2.06 · 77.5% (31 of 40 decks)
- Ashling's Command relevance 1.97 · 55.0% (22 of 40 decks)
- Cavalier of Night relevance 1.89 · 42.5% (17 of 40 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.87 · 80.0% (32 of 40 decks)
- Flamebraider relevance 1.84 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Flamekin Harbinger relevance 1.78 · 52.5% (21 of 40 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 1.78 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 1.73 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Ygra, Eater of All relevance 1.71 · 30.0% (12 of 40 decks)
- Faultgrinder relevance 1.70 · 25.0% (10 of 40 decks)
- Lamentation relevance 1.63 · 60.0% (24 of 40 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 1.61 · 62.5% (25 of 40 decks)
- Spitebellows relevance 1.61 · 30.0% (12 of 40 decks)
- Shriekmaw relevance 1.58 · 57.5% (23 of 40 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 1.58 · 57.5% (23 of 40 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.55 · 57.5% (23 of 40 decks)
- Torrent Elemental relevance 1.55 · 25.0% (10 of 40 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.53 · 35.0% (14 of 40 decks)
- Animar, Soul of Elements relevance 1.52 · 50.0% (20 of 40 decks)
- Rottenmouth Viper relevance 1.52 · 37.5% (15 of 40 decks)
- Twinflame Travelers relevance 1.51 · 52.5% (21 of 40 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 1.49 · 50.0% (20 of 40 decks)
- Wispmare relevance 1.47 · 25.0% (10 of 40 decks)
- Lord of Extinction relevance 1.46 · 22.5% (9 of 40 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 1.45 · 55.0% (22 of 40 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 1.44 · 50.0% (20 of 40 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 1.43 · 62.5% (25 of 40 decks)
- Mass of Mysteries relevance 1.42 · 50.0% (20 of 40 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 1.41 · 50.0% (20 of 40 decks)
- Impulsivity relevance 1.41 · 47.5% (19 of 40 decks)
All creatures (46)
- Smokebraider relevance 2.06 · 77.5% (31 of 40 decks)
- Cavalier of Night relevance 1.89 · 42.5% (17 of 40 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.87 · 80.0% (32 of 40 decks)
- Flamebraider relevance 1.84 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Flamekin Harbinger relevance 1.78 · 52.5% (21 of 40 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 1.78 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 1.73 · 70.0% (28 of 40 decks)
- Ygra, Eater of All relevance 1.71 · 30.0% (12 of 40 decks)
- Faultgrinder relevance 1.70 · 25.0% (10 of 40 decks)
- Lamentation relevance 1.63 · 60.0% (24 of 40 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 1.61 · 62.5% (25 of 40 decks)
- Spitebellows relevance 1.61 · 30.0% (12 of 40 decks)
- Shriekmaw relevance 1.58 · 57.5% (23 of 40 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 1.58 · 57.5% (23 of 40 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.55 · 57.5% (23 of 40 decks)
- Torrent Elemental relevance 1.55 · 25.0% (10 of 40 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.53 · 35.0% (14 of 40 decks)
- Animar, Soul of Elements relevance 1.52 · 50.0% (20 of 40 decks)
- Rottenmouth Viper relevance 1.52 · 37.5% (15 of 40 decks)
- Twinflame Travelers relevance 1.51 · 52.5% (21 of 40 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 1.49 · 50.0% (20 of 40 decks)
- Wispmare relevance 1.47 · 25.0% (10 of 40 decks)
- Lord of Extinction relevance 1.46 · 22.5% (9 of 40 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 1.45 · 55.0% (22 of 40 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 1.44 · 50.0% (20 of 40 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 1.43 · 62.5% (25 of 40 decks)
- Mass of Mysteries relevance 1.42 · 50.0% (20 of 40 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 1.41 · 50.0% (20 of 40 decks)
- Impulsivity relevance 1.41 · 47.5% (19 of 40 decks)
- Jubilation relevance 1.41 · 50.0% (20 of 40 decks)
- Subterfuge relevance 1.41 · 50.0% (20 of 40 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 1.38 · 22.5% (9 of 40 decks)
- Ingot Chewer relevance 1.34 · 42.5% (17 of 40 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.32 · 52.5% (21 of 40 decks)
- Shimmercreep relevance 1.31 · 40.0% (16 of 40 decks)
- Fury relevance 1.30 · 47.5% (19 of 40 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.30 · 47.5% (19 of 40 decks)
- Horde of Notions relevance 1.29 · 45.0% (18 of 40 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 1.26 · 40.0% (16 of 40 decks)
- Brighthearth Banneret relevance 1.23 · 35.0% (14 of 40 decks)
- Tyrant of Discord relevance 1.18 · 25.0% (10 of 40 decks)
- Ashling, the Limitless relevance 1.18 · 22.5% (9 of 40 decks)
- Nevermaker relevance 1.14 · 20.0% (8 of 40 decks)
- Havoc Eater relevance 1.14 · 22.5% (9 of 40 decks)
- Jegantha, the Wellspring relevance 1.13 · 45.0% (18 of 40 decks)
- Greenwarden of Murasa relevance 1.13 · 42.5% (17 of 40 decks)
All instants (1)
- Ashling's Command relevance 1.97 · 55.0% (22 of 40 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 1.27 · 25.0% (10 of 40 decks)
- Flamekin Village relevance 1.26 · 42.5% (17 of 40 decks)
All lands (1)
- Primal Beyond relevance 1.59 · 57.5% (23 of 40 decks)
EDH data for Tar Fiend: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 40 real decks.


















