Cantankerous Keepers
Played in 306 Green decks
1830+43+2+2+1+1+1+
Color Identity Spread
6.2% Green
-
Sultai 2,682 · 53.9%
-
Golgari 873 · 17.6%
-
Simic 743 · 14.9%
-
Green 306 · 6.2%
-
Bant 221 · 4.4%
- Other (13) 149 · 3.0%
Commanders
Ezuri, Renegade Leader 3.4% of decks
Ezuri, Renegade Leader 3.4% of decks
Marwyn, the Nurturer 1.6% of decks
Marwyn, the Nurturer 1.6% of decks
Galadriel, Gift-Giver 20.8% of decks
Galadriel, Gift-Giver 20.8% of decks
Eladamri, Lord of Leaves 3.1% of decks
Eladamri, Lord of Leaves 3.1% of decks
Dionus, Elvish Archdruid 1.2% of decks
Dionus, Elvish Archdruid 1.2% of decks
Imaryll, Elfhame Elite 3.9% of decks
Imaryll, Elfhame Elite 3.9% of decks
Most Relevant
Woodland Weavemaster 43.8% of decks
Woodland Weavemaster 43.8% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 84.3% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 84.3% of decks
Elvish Warmaster 58.8% of decks
Elvish Warmaster 58.8% of decks
Imperious Perfect 59.5% of decks
Imperious Perfect 59.5% of decks
Champions of the Perfect 47.4% of decks
Champions of the Perfect 47.4% of decks
Leaf-Crowned Visionary 57.8% of decks
Leaf-Crowned Visionary 57.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (18)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 2.31 · 3.4% (47 of 1,389 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.96 · 1.6% (69 of 4,327 decks)
- Galadriel, Gift-Giver relevance 1.67 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 1.58 · 3.1% (14 of 445 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.52 · 1.2% (38 of 3,144 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 1.37 · 3.9% (8 of 204 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 1.33 · 1.4% (20 of 1,448 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.13 · 1.2% (15 of 1,304 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 1.11 · 1.8% (9 of 507 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.99 · 2.6% (5 of 189 decks)
- Galion, Elvenking's Butler relevance 0.95 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.67 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Tyvar, the Pummeler relevance 0.64 · 1.1% (4 of 364 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.56 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.52 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.44 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Beorn, Reluctant Host // Till and Tend relevance 0.40 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Glissa Sunseeker relevance 0.31 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Woodland Weavemaster relevance 2.68 · 43.8% (134 of 306 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.15 · 84.3% (258 of 306 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.99 · 58.8% (180 of 306 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.89 · 59.5% (182 of 306 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.82 · 47.4% (145 of 306 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.81 · 57.8% (177 of 306 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.65 · 72.5% (222 of 306 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.65 · 45.1% (138 of 306 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.64 · 47.4% (145 of 306 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 1.52 · 39.5% (121 of 306 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.51 · 47.7% (146 of 306 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.46 · 40.2% (123 of 306 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.45 · 34.6% (106 of 306 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.43 · 45.1% (138 of 306 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.39 · 40.2% (123 of 306 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.36 · 37.3% (114 of 306 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.36 · 37.6% (115 of 306 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.32 · 35.3% (108 of 306 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.32 · 36.3% (111 of 306 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 1.30 · 32.4% (99 of 306 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 1.29 · 33.7% (103 of 306 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.27 · 33.3% (102 of 306 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.24 · 34.0% (104 of 306 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.24 · 36.3% (111 of 306 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 1.21 · 47.4% (145 of 306 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.17 · 64.7% (198 of 306 decks)
- Down in the Valley relevance 1.16 · 18.3% (56 of 306 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 1.15 · 29.7% (91 of 306 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.15 · 29.1% (89 of 306 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 1.11 · 29.1% (89 of 306 decks)
All creatures (43)
- Woodland Weavemaster relevance 2.68 · 43.8% (134 of 306 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.15 · 84.3% (258 of 306 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.99 · 58.8% (180 of 306 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.89 · 59.5% (182 of 306 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.82 · 47.4% (145 of 306 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.81 · 57.8% (177 of 306 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.65 · 72.5% (222 of 306 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.65 · 45.1% (138 of 306 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.64 · 47.4% (145 of 306 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 1.52 · 39.5% (121 of 306 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.51 · 47.7% (146 of 306 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.46 · 40.2% (123 of 306 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.45 · 34.6% (106 of 306 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.43 · 45.1% (138 of 306 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.39 · 40.2% (123 of 306 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.36 · 37.3% (114 of 306 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.36 · 37.6% (115 of 306 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.32 · 35.3% (108 of 306 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.32 · 36.3% (111 of 306 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 1.30 · 32.4% (99 of 306 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 1.29 · 33.7% (103 of 306 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.27 · 33.3% (102 of 306 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.24 · 34.0% (104 of 306 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.24 · 36.3% (111 of 306 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 1.21 · 47.4% (145 of 306 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.17 · 64.7% (198 of 306 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 1.15 · 29.7% (91 of 306 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 1.11 · 29.1% (89 of 306 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 1.02 · 23.5% (72 of 306 decks)
- Guardian of the Halls relevance 1.00 · 15.0% (46 of 306 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.00 · 34.3% (105 of 306 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.99 · 32.4% (99 of 306 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.95 · 45.8% (140 of 306 decks)
- Mirkwood Pathmaker relevance 0.95 · 18.0% (55 of 306 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.94 · 20.3% (62 of 306 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.90 · 57.2% (175 of 306 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.89 · 35.6% (109 of 306 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.89 · 26.1% (80 of 306 decks)
- Boughside Wanderers relevance 0.87 · 14.1% (43 of 306 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.84 · 25.8% (79 of 306 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.83 · 23.9% (73 of 306 decks)
- Sylvan Messenger relevance 0.83 · 16.7% (51 of 306 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 0.80 · 17.3% (53 of 306 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Down in the Valley relevance 1.16 · 18.3% (56 of 306 decks)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 1.04 · 26.1% (80 of 306 decks)
All instants (2)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.15 · 29.1% (89 of 306 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 1.03 · 27.8% (85 of 306 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.08 · 27.5% (84 of 306 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 1.09 · 37.9% (116 of 306 decks)
All lands (1)
- Elven Passage relevance 1.09 · 21.2% (65 of 306 decks)
EDH data for Cantankerous Keepers: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 306 real decks.






























