Curate
Played in 504 Simic decks
2330+9+1+21+11+4+4+
Color Identity Spread
2.8% Simic
Commanders
Master Chef // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy 18.3% of decks
Master Chef // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy 18.3% of decks
Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy 4.5% of decks
Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy 4.5% of decks
Slogurk, the Overslime 2.6% of decks
Slogurk, the Overslime 2.6% of decks
Raised by Giants // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy 7.7% of decks
Raised by Giants // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy 7.7% of decks
Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle 2.1% of decks
Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle 2.1% of decks
Grolnok, the Omnivore 1.2% of decks
Grolnok, the Omnivore 1.2% of decks
Most Relevant
Consider 37.1% of decks
Consider 37.1% of decks
Opt 34.1% of decks
Opt 34.1% of decks
Otherworldly Gaze 16.7% of decks
Otherworldly Gaze 16.7% of decks
Thought Scour 15.3% of decks
Thought Scour 15.3% of decks
Frantic Search 23.6% of decks
Frantic Search 23.6% of decks
Brainstorm 29.2% of decks
Brainstorm 29.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (23)
- Master Chef // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 3.06 · 18.3% (38 of 208 decks)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 1.67 · 4.5% (17 of 382 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 1.56 · 2.6% (24 of 910 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 1.49 · 7.7% (8 of 104 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 1.47 · 2.1% (26 of 1,221 decks)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 1.33 · 1.2% (45 of 3,879 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 0.87 · 1.4% (9 of 641 decks)
- Kianne, Dean of Substance // Imbraham, Dean of Theory relevance 0.78 · 4.1% (3 of 73 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.78 · 9.1% (2 of 22 decks)
- Brawn, Amadeus Cho relevance 0.77 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Hardy Outlander relevance 0.59 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.51 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- It Came from Planet Glurg relevance 0.44 · 1.6% (2 of 122 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.44 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.41 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Wilson, Refined Grizzly // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.41 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Skanos Dragonheart // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.39 · 4.0% (1 of 25 decks)
- Acolyte of Bahamut // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.36 · 1.0% (2 of 194 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.26 · 1.4% (1 of 74 decks)
- Duggan, Private Detective relevance 0.25 · 1.3% (1 of 76 decks)
- Zegana, Utopian Speaker relevance 0.24 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.24 · 1.1% (1 of 88 decks)
- Guru Pathik relevance 0.23 · 1.1% (1 of 92 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Consider relevance 1.51 · 37.1% (187 of 504 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.93 · 34.1% (172 of 504 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.82 · 16.7% (84 of 504 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.76 · 15.3% (77 of 504 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.63 · 23.6% (119 of 504 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.58 · 29.2% (147 of 504 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.50 · 31.7% (160 of 504 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.50 · 23.2% (117 of 504 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.49 · 14.1% (71 of 504 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.49 · 7.7% (39 of 504 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.49 · 12.5% (63 of 504 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.49 · 11.3% (57 of 504 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.48 · 8.7% (44 of 504 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.46 · 17.5% (88 of 504 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.45 · 7.1% (36 of 504 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 0.45 · 13.5% (68 of 504 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.45 · 9.5% (48 of 504 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.44 · 25.2% (127 of 504 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.43 · 15.9% (80 of 504 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.40 · 11.9% (60 of 504 decks)
- Needlethorn Drake relevance 0.39 · 6.7% (34 of 504 decks)
- Doc Aurlock, Grizzled Genius relevance 0.39 · 8.9% (45 of 504 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.38 · 16.3% (82 of 504 decks)
- Golden Ratio relevance 0.37 · 8.1% (41 of 504 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.37 · 29.2% (147 of 504 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.37 · 6.9% (35 of 504 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (36 of 504 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.37 · 8.5% (43 of 504 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.35 · 25.2% (127 of 504 decks)
- Slime Against Humanity relevance 0.35 · 7.3% (37 of 504 decks)
All creatures (9)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.49 · 14.1% (71 of 504 decks)
- Needlethorn Drake relevance 0.39 · 6.7% (34 of 504 decks)
- Doc Aurlock, Grizzled Genius relevance 0.39 · 8.9% (45 of 504 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.37 · 29.2% (147 of 504 decks)
- Quandrix Apprentice relevance 0.35 · 9.9% (50 of 504 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.34 · 11.7% (59 of 504 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.32 · 13.5% (68 of 504 decks)
- Deranged Assistant relevance 0.31 · 6.2% (31 of 504 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 0.31 · 6.7% (34 of 504 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.37 · 6.9% (35 of 504 decks)
All instants (21)
- Consider relevance 1.51 · 37.1% (187 of 504 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.93 · 34.1% (172 of 504 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.82 · 16.7% (84 of 504 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.76 · 15.3% (77 of 504 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.63 · 23.6% (119 of 504 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.58 · 29.2% (147 of 504 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.50 · 31.7% (160 of 504 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.50 · 23.2% (117 of 504 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.49 · 7.7% (39 of 504 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.49 · 12.5% (63 of 504 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.49 · 11.3% (57 of 504 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.48 · 8.7% (44 of 504 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 0.45 · 13.5% (68 of 504 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.45 · 9.5% (48 of 504 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.40 · 11.9% (60 of 504 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.38 · 16.3% (82 of 504 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (36 of 504 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.37 · 8.5% (43 of 504 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.35 · 8.1% (41 of 504 decks)
- Deduce relevance 0.33 · 6.9% (35 of 504 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (63 of 504 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Preordain relevance 0.46 · 17.5% (88 of 504 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.45 · 7.1% (36 of 504 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.44 · 25.2% (127 of 504 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.43 · 15.9% (80 of 504 decks)
- Golden Ratio relevance 0.37 · 8.1% (41 of 504 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.35 · 25.2% (127 of 504 decks)
- Slime Against Humanity relevance 0.35 · 7.3% (37 of 504 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (43 of 504 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 0.33 · 6.9% (35 of 504 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.33 · 8.3% (42 of 504 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.31 · 8.9% (45 of 504 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.45 · 22.8% (115 of 504 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (32 of 504 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.32 · 12.7% (64 of 504 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.32 · 6.2% (31 of 504 decks)
All lands (4)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.59 · 36.3% (183 of 504 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.44 · 26.2% (132 of 504 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.32 · 12.3% (62 of 504 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.31 · 15.7% (79 of 504 decks)
EDH data for Curate: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 504 real decks.



































































