Finale of Revelation
Played in 1,849 Five-Color decks
930+4+4+4+7+15+2+14+
Color Identity Spread
2.8% Five-Color
Commanders
Ramos, Dragon Engine 3.9% of decks
Ramos, Dragon Engine 3.9% of decks
Vorthos, Steward of Myth 14.8% of decks
Vorthos, Steward of Myth 14.8% of decks
Omnath, Locus of All 3.1% of decks
Omnath, Locus of All 3.1% of decks
The Wandering Minstrel 1.6% of decks
The Wandering Minstrel 1.6% of decks
Codie, Vociferous Codex 1.8% of decks
Codie, Vociferous Codex 1.8% of decks
Progenitus 1.4% of decks
Progenitus 1.4% of decks
Most Relevant
Exsanguinate 15.4% of decks
Exsanguinate 15.4% of decks
Torment of Hailfire 14.3% of decks
Torment of Hailfire 14.3% of decks
Tatyova, Benthic Druid 17.3% of decks
Tatyova, Benthic Druid 17.3% of decks
Pull from Tomorrow 11.5% of decks
Pull from Tomorrow 11.5% of decks
Villainous Wealth 14.2% of decks
Villainous Wealth 14.2% of decks
Circuitous Route 17.8% of decks
Circuitous Route 17.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (9)
- Ramos, Dragon Engine relevance 2.54 · 3.9% (293 of 7,433 decks)
- Vorthos, Steward of Myth relevance 2.52 · 14.8% (39 of 263 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of All relevance 2.18 · 3.1% (221 of 7,225 decks)
- The Wandering Minstrel relevance 1.60 · 1.6% (197 of 12,219 decks)
- Codie, Vociferous Codex relevance 1.47 · 1.8% (102 of 5,764 decks)
- Progenitus relevance 1.07 · 1.4% (42 of 2,915 decks)
- Garth One-Eye relevance 0.82 · 1.0% (31 of 3,058 decks)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Cecily, Haunted Mage relevance 0.79 · 1.3% (17 of 1,293 decks)
- Princess Twilight Sparkle relevance 0.68 · 1.2% (13 of 1,097 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.74 · 15.4% (285 of 1,849 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.69 · 14.3% (264 of 1,849 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.65 · 17.3% (320 of 1,849 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.64 · 11.5% (213 of 1,849 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.64 · 14.2% (262 of 1,849 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.62 · 17.8% (329 of 1,849 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.57 · 20.7% (383 of 1,849 decks)
- Debt to the Deathless relevance 0.54 · 11.0% (203 of 1,849 decks)
- Sphinx's Revelation relevance 0.54 · 10.2% (188 of 1,849 decks)
- Crackle with Power relevance 0.50 · 9.1% (168 of 1,849 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.49 · 10.5% (194 of 1,849 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.49 · 8.9% (164 of 1,849 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.48 · 8.3% (154 of 1,849 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (157 of 1,849 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.47 · 12.0% (221 of 1,849 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.47 · 12.8% (237 of 1,849 decks)
- Finale of Glory relevance 0.46 · 7.0% (130 of 1,849 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (262 of 1,849 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.44 · 8.1% (150 of 1,849 decks)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 0.43 · 6.8% (126 of 1,849 decks)
- Maelstrom Pulse relevance 0.42 · 7.4% (136 of 1,849 decks)
- Ruinous Ultimatum relevance 0.41 · 13.9% (257 of 1,849 decks)
- Magus Lucea Kane relevance 0.40 · 6.2% (115 of 1,849 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.40 · 13.9% (257 of 1,849 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.40 · 17.0% (314 of 1,849 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.40 · 8.5% (158 of 1,849 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.39 · 10.0% (185 of 1,849 decks)
- Boros Charm relevance 0.39 · 12.2% (226 of 1,849 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.39 · 12.0% (222 of 1,849 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.39 · 17.7% (328 of 1,849 decks)
All creatures (4)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.65 · 17.3% (320 of 1,849 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.49 · 8.9% (164 of 1,849 decks)
- Magus Lucea Kane relevance 0.40 · 6.2% (115 of 1,849 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.40 · 17.0% (314 of 1,849 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.47 · 12.0% (221 of 1,849 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.47 · 12.8% (237 of 1,849 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.40 · 13.9% (257 of 1,849 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.39 · 17.7% (328 of 1,849 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.49 · 10.5% (194 of 1,849 decks)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 0.43 · 6.8% (126 of 1,849 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.39 · 10.0% (185 of 1,849 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.38 · 6.2% (115 of 1,849 decks)
All instants (7)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.64 · 11.5% (213 of 1,849 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.57 · 20.7% (383 of 1,849 decks)
- Sphinx's Revelation relevance 0.54 · 10.2% (188 of 1,849 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.48 · 8.3% (154 of 1,849 decks)
- Boros Charm relevance 0.39 · 12.2% (226 of 1,849 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.38 · 14.9% (275 of 1,849 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.37 · 9.0% (166 of 1,849 decks)
All sorceries (15)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.74 · 15.4% (285 of 1,849 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.69 · 14.3% (264 of 1,849 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.64 · 14.2% (262 of 1,849 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.62 · 17.8% (329 of 1,849 decks)
- Debt to the Deathless relevance 0.54 · 11.0% (203 of 1,849 decks)
- Crackle with Power relevance 0.50 · 9.1% (168 of 1,849 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (157 of 1,849 decks)
- Finale of Glory relevance 0.46 · 7.0% (130 of 1,849 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (262 of 1,849 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.44 · 8.1% (150 of 1,849 decks)
- Maelstrom Pulse relevance 0.42 · 7.4% (136 of 1,849 decks)
- Ruinous Ultimatum relevance 0.41 · 13.9% (257 of 1,849 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.40 · 8.5% (158 of 1,849 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.39 · 12.0% (222 of 1,849 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.38 · 9.2% (170 of 1,849 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Maze's End relevance 0.55 · 15.5% (287 of 1,849 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.54 · 34.0% (628 of 1,849 decks)
All lands (14)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 0.59 · 17.5% (323 of 1,849 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.58 · 17.4% (322 of 1,849 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.58 · 17.3% (319 of 1,849 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.57 · 16.9% (313 of 1,849 decks)
- Boros Guildgate relevance 0.57 · 16.7% (308 of 1,849 decks)
- Orzhov Guildgate relevance 0.57 · 16.5% (305 of 1,849 decks)
- Azorius Guildgate relevance 0.57 · 16.8% (311 of 1,849 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.56 · 16.3% (302 of 1,849 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.55 · 16.3% (301 of 1,849 decks)
- Rakdos Guildgate relevance 0.54 · 15.7% (291 of 1,849 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.38 · 10.3% (190 of 1,849 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.38 · 22.6% (418 of 1,849 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 0.38 · 11.0% (203 of 1,849 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 0.38 · 10.7% (198 of 1,849 decks)
EDH data for Finale of Revelation: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,849 real decks.
















































