Ceremonious Rejection
Played in 145 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
22.0% Azorius
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (3)
- Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 2.50 · 1.4% (91 of 6,370 decks)
- Tobias Andrion relevance 0.42 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Rebbec, Architect of Ascension // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 0.38 · 1.4% (1 of 74 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Annul relevance 3.06 · 69.7% (101 of 145 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 2.94 · 46.9% (68 of 145 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 2.93 · 46.2% (67 of 145 decks)
- Blue Elemental Blast relevance 2.88 · 48.3% (70 of 145 decks)
- Censor relevance 2.85 · 46.9% (68 of 145 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 2.81 · 40.7% (59 of 145 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 2.57 · 42.8% (62 of 145 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 2.56 · 42.8% (62 of 145 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 2.49 · 44.1% (64 of 145 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 2.46 · 37.9% (55 of 145 decks)
- Abjure relevance 2.42 · 46.2% (67 of 145 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 2.36 · 38.6% (56 of 145 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 2.35 · 36.6% (53 of 145 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 2.33 · 41.4% (60 of 145 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 2.28 · 40.0% (58 of 145 decks)
- Cancel relevance 2.21 · 55.9% (81 of 145 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 2.18 · 37.9% (55 of 145 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 2.07 · 30.3% (44 of 145 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 2.06 · 39.3% (57 of 145 decks)
- Countermand relevance 2.06 · 31.7% (46 of 145 decks)
- Contradict relevance 2.06 · 31.0% (45 of 145 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 2.04 · 29.7% (43 of 145 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 2.04 · 37.2% (54 of 145 decks)
- Abstruse Interference relevance 2.03 · 31.7% (46 of 145 decks)
- Chain to Memory relevance 2.02 · 29.7% (43 of 145 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 2.02 · 40.7% (59 of 145 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 1.99 · 29.7% (43 of 145 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 1.99 · 35.2% (51 of 145 decks)
- Complicate relevance 1.99 · 30.3% (44 of 145 decks)
- Chill relevance 1.99 · 30.3% (44 of 145 decks)
All creatures (2)
- Cursecatcher relevance 1.90 · 32.4% (47 of 145 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 1.85 · 26.9% (39 of 145 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Chill relevance 1.99 · 30.3% (44 of 145 decks)
- Aether Meltdown relevance 1.92 · 29.0% (42 of 145 decks)
All instants (45)
- Annul relevance 3.06 · 69.7% (101 of 145 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 2.94 · 46.9% (68 of 145 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 2.93 · 46.2% (67 of 145 decks)
- Blue Elemental Blast relevance 2.88 · 48.3% (70 of 145 decks)
- Censor relevance 2.85 · 46.9% (68 of 145 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 2.81 · 40.7% (59 of 145 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 2.57 · 42.8% (62 of 145 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 2.56 · 42.8% (62 of 145 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 2.49 · 44.1% (64 of 145 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 2.46 · 37.9% (55 of 145 decks)
- Abjure relevance 2.42 · 46.2% (67 of 145 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 2.36 · 38.6% (56 of 145 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 2.35 · 36.6% (53 of 145 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 2.33 · 41.4% (60 of 145 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 2.28 · 40.0% (58 of 145 decks)
- Cancel relevance 2.21 · 55.9% (81 of 145 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 2.18 · 37.9% (55 of 145 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 2.07 · 30.3% (44 of 145 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 2.06 · 39.3% (57 of 145 decks)
- Countermand relevance 2.06 · 31.7% (46 of 145 decks)
- Contradict relevance 2.06 · 31.0% (45 of 145 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 2.04 · 29.7% (43 of 145 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 2.04 · 37.2% (54 of 145 decks)
- Abstruse Interference relevance 2.03 · 31.7% (46 of 145 decks)
- Chain to Memory relevance 2.02 · 29.7% (43 of 145 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 2.02 · 40.7% (59 of 145 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 1.99 · 29.7% (43 of 145 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 1.99 · 35.2% (51 of 145 decks)
- Complicate relevance 1.99 · 30.3% (44 of 145 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 1.96 · 48.3% (70 of 145 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 1.96 · 29.0% (42 of 145 decks)
- Confound relevance 1.94 · 39.3% (57 of 145 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 1.94 · 35.9% (52 of 145 decks)
- Catalog relevance 1.93 · 29.0% (42 of 145 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 1.92 · 28.3% (41 of 145 decks)
- Aerial Formation relevance 1.92 · 28.3% (41 of 145 decks)
- Bar the Gate relevance 1.92 · 35.2% (51 of 145 decks)
- Convolute relevance 1.88 · 33.1% (48 of 145 decks)
- Behind the Mask relevance 1.88 · 28.3% (41 of 145 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.88 · 39.3% (57 of 145 decks)
- Absorb Identity relevance 1.87 · 28.3% (41 of 145 decks)
- Case the Joint relevance 1.86 · 27.6% (40 of 145 decks)
- Built to Last relevance 1.85 · 27.6% (40 of 145 decks)
- Boing! relevance 1.85 · 26.9% (39 of 145 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 1.82 · 30.3% (44 of 145 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Breakthrough relevance 1.91 · 29.7% (43 of 145 decks)
EDH data for Ceremonious Rejection: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 145 real decks.