Copper Host Crusher
Played in 242 Gruul decks
930+42+1+1+1+5+
Color Identity Spread
3.9% Gruul
Commanders
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alena, Kessig Trapper 1.7% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alena, Kessig Trapper 1.7% of decks
Tavern Brawler // Wilson, Refined Grizzly 2.5% of decks
Tavern Brawler // Wilson, Refined Grizzly 2.5% of decks
Migloz, Maze Crusher 1.1% of decks
Migloz, Maze Crusher 1.1% of decks
Jolene, Plundering Pugilist 1.8% of decks
Jolene, Plundering Pugilist 1.8% of decks
Tuya Bearclaw 1.3% of decks
Tuya Bearclaw 1.3% of decks
Stonebrow, Krosan Hero 1.0% of decks
Stonebrow, Krosan Hero 1.0% of decks
Most Relevant
Pelakka Wurm 15.7% of decks
Pelakka Wurm 15.7% of decks
Giant Ankheg 18.6% of decks
Giant Ankheg 18.6% of decks
Annoyed Altisaur 22.3% of decks
Annoyed Altisaur 22.3% of decks
Coliseum Behemoth 16.1% of decks
Coliseum Behemoth 16.1% of decks
Ghalta, Primal Hunger 36.8% of decks
Ghalta, Primal Hunger 36.8% of decks
Rhino, Barreling Brute 16.5% of decks
Rhino, Barreling Brute 16.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (9)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 1.77 · 1.7% (31 of 1,858 decks)
- Tavern Brawler // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 1.04 · 2.5% (5 of 200 decks)
- Migloz, Maze Crusher relevance 0.79 · 1.1% (5 of 456 decks)
- Jolene, Plundering Pugilist relevance 0.57 · 1.8% (2 of 112 decks)
- Tuya Bearclaw relevance 0.52 · 1.3% (2 of 150 decks)
- Stonebrow, Krosan Hero relevance 0.47 · 1.0% (2 of 199 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.35 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Guild Artisan // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.33 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
- Kraven, Proud Predator relevance 0.30 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.87 · 15.7% (38 of 242 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.87 · 18.6% (45 of 242 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.85 · 22.3% (54 of 242 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.81 · 16.1% (39 of 242 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.75 · 36.8% (89 of 242 decks)
- Rhino, Barreling Brute relevance 0.72 · 16.5% (40 of 242 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.69 · 15.7% (38 of 242 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.68 · 21.5% (52 of 242 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.67 · 14.0% (34 of 242 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 0.67 · 10.3% (25 of 242 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.66 · 35.5% (86 of 242 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.65 · 14.9% (36 of 242 decks)
- Ancient Imperiosaur relevance 0.59 · 10.3% (25 of 242 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.57 · 17.8% (43 of 242 decks)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (26 of 242 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.56 · 14.0% (34 of 242 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 0.53 · 12.8% (31 of 242 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.53 · 18.6% (45 of 242 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 0.53 · 9.5% (23 of 242 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 0.53 · 9.5% (23 of 242 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.53 · 11.2% (27 of 242 decks)
- Rust Goliath relevance 0.51 · 7.9% (19 of 242 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 0.51 · 7.4% (18 of 242 decks)
- Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 0.51 · 22.3% (54 of 242 decks)
- Paladin of Predation relevance 0.51 · 7.9% (19 of 242 decks)
- Terra Stomper relevance 0.51 · 9.1% (22 of 242 decks)
- Ancient Stone Idol relevance 0.49 · 8.7% (21 of 242 decks)
- Galewind Moose relevance 0.49 · 8.3% (20 of 242 decks)
- Rampaging Brontodon relevance 0.48 · 9.5% (23 of 242 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.48 · 12.4% (30 of 242 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.87 · 15.7% (38 of 242 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.87 · 18.6% (45 of 242 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.85 · 22.3% (54 of 242 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.81 · 16.1% (39 of 242 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.75 · 36.8% (89 of 242 decks)
- Rhino, Barreling Brute relevance 0.72 · 16.5% (40 of 242 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.69 · 15.7% (38 of 242 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.68 · 21.5% (52 of 242 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.67 · 14.0% (34 of 242 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 0.67 · 10.3% (25 of 242 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.66 · 35.5% (86 of 242 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.65 · 14.9% (36 of 242 decks)
- Ancient Imperiosaur relevance 0.59 · 10.3% (25 of 242 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.57 · 17.8% (43 of 242 decks)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (26 of 242 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.56 · 14.0% (34 of 242 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 0.53 · 12.8% (31 of 242 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.53 · 18.6% (45 of 242 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 0.53 · 9.5% (23 of 242 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 0.53 · 9.5% (23 of 242 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.53 · 11.2% (27 of 242 decks)
- Rust Goliath relevance 0.51 · 7.9% (19 of 242 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 0.51 · 7.4% (18 of 242 decks)
- Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 0.51 · 22.3% (54 of 242 decks)
- Paladin of Predation relevance 0.51 · 7.9% (19 of 242 decks)
- Terra Stomper relevance 0.51 · 9.1% (22 of 242 decks)
- Ancient Stone Idol relevance 0.49 · 8.7% (21 of 242 decks)
- Galewind Moose relevance 0.49 · 8.3% (20 of 242 decks)
- Rampaging Brontodon relevance 0.48 · 9.5% (23 of 242 decks)
- Desolation Twin relevance 0.47 · 7.9% (19 of 242 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 0.47 · 9.5% (23 of 242 decks)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 0.47 · 8.7% (21 of 242 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 0.46 · 8.7% (21 of 242 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 0.46 · 13.2% (32 of 242 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.46 · 19.0% (46 of 242 decks)
- Altanak, the Thrice-Called relevance 0.45 · 8.3% (20 of 242 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 0.45 · 9.5% (23 of 242 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.42 · 8.7% (21 of 242 decks)
- Bane of Bala Ged relevance 0.42 · 8.3% (20 of 242 decks)
- Thorn Elemental relevance 0.42 · 6.2% (15 of 242 decks)
- Cactusfolk Sureshot relevance 0.41 · 12.0% (29 of 242 decks)
- Hierophant Bio-Titan relevance 0.41 · 7.4% (18 of 242 decks)
All instants (1)
- Bite Down relevance 0.47 · 11.6% (28 of 242 decks)
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.48 · 12.4% (30 of 242 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Racers' Ring relevance 0.46 · 11.2% (27 of 242 decks)
All lands (5)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.75 · 32.6% (79 of 242 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.66 · 21.1% (51 of 242 decks)
- Thriving Bluff relevance 0.49 · 12.4% (30 of 242 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 0.47 · 13.2% (32 of 242 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.46 · 30.2% (73 of 242 decks)
EDH data for Copper Host Crusher: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 242 real decks.




























