Copper Host Crusher
Played in 177 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
2.8% Simic
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (5)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 2.04 · 1.3% (42 of 3,189 decks)
- Shameless Charlatan // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 1.05 · 4.3% (3 of 69 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.96 · 3.0% (3 of 99 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.70 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.40 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.99 · 19.2% (34 of 177 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.80 · 13.0% (23 of 177 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.80 · 22.0% (39 of 177 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.75 · 16.9% (30 of 177 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.68 · 11.3% (20 of 177 decks)
- Galewind Moose relevance 0.60 · 9.0% (16 of 177 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.59 · 9.6% (17 of 177 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.58 · 24.9% (44 of 177 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.57 · 11.3% (20 of 177 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 0.54 · 8.5% (15 of 177 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.53 · 15.8% (28 of 177 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.52 · 17.5% (31 of 177 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.52 · 11.9% (21 of 177 decks)
- Nightshade Dryad relevance 0.52 · 11.3% (20 of 177 decks)
- Breaker of Armies relevance 0.51 · 8.5% (15 of 177 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 0.51 · 7.9% (14 of 177 decks)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 0.50 · 9.6% (17 of 177 decks)
- Three Tree Rootweaver relevance 0.49 · 9.0% (16 of 177 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.48 · 14.1% (25 of 177 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.48 · 12.4% (22 of 177 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.46 · 10.7% (19 of 177 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.46 · 14.7% (26 of 177 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.46 · 7.9% (14 of 177 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.46 · 9.6% (17 of 177 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.46 · 7.9% (14 of 177 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.44 · 12.4% (22 of 177 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.44 · 15.3% (27 of 177 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.44 · 24.3% (43 of 177 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.42 · 11.9% (21 of 177 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.42 · 12.4% (22 of 177 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.99 · 19.2% (34 of 177 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.80 · 13.0% (23 of 177 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.80 · 22.0% (39 of 177 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.75 · 16.9% (30 of 177 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.68 · 11.3% (20 of 177 decks)
- Galewind Moose relevance 0.60 · 9.0% (16 of 177 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.59 · 9.6% (17 of 177 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.58 · 24.9% (44 of 177 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.57 · 11.3% (20 of 177 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 0.54 · 8.5% (15 of 177 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.53 · 15.8% (28 of 177 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.52 · 17.5% (31 of 177 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.52 · 11.9% (21 of 177 decks)
- Nightshade Dryad relevance 0.52 · 11.3% (20 of 177 decks)
- Breaker of Armies relevance 0.51 · 8.5% (15 of 177 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 0.51 · 7.9% (14 of 177 decks)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 0.50 · 9.6% (17 of 177 decks)
- Three Tree Rootweaver relevance 0.49 · 9.0% (16 of 177 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.48 · 14.1% (25 of 177 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.48 · 12.4% (22 of 177 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.46 · 10.7% (19 of 177 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.46 · 14.7% (26 of 177 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.46 · 7.9% (14 of 177 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.46 · 9.6% (17 of 177 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.46 · 7.9% (14 of 177 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.44 · 12.4% (22 of 177 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.44 · 15.3% (27 of 177 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.42 · 11.9% (21 of 177 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.42 · 12.4% (22 of 177 decks)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 0.42 · 10.2% (18 of 177 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.42 · 12.4% (22 of 177 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.42 · 13.0% (23 of 177 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.41 · 9.0% (16 of 177 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.41 · 7.3% (13 of 177 decks)
- Daggermaw Megalodon relevance 0.40 · 6.2% (11 of 177 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.40 · 9.0% (16 of 177 decks)
- Gyre Engineer relevance 0.40 · 10.2% (18 of 177 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.40 · 31.1% (55 of 177 decks)
- Rust Goliath relevance 0.39 · 6.2% (11 of 177 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.39 · 11.3% (20 of 177 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.38 · 8.5% (15 of 177 decks)
- Tyrranax Rex relevance 0.38 · 6.8% (12 of 177 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.39 · 13.6% (24 of 177 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.44 · 24.3% (43 of 177 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.38 · 10.7% (19 of 177 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.38 · 9.6% (17 of 177 decks)
All lands (4)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.85 · 42.9% (76 of 177 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.46 · 28.2% (50 of 177 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.42 · 10.7% (19 of 177 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.41 · 10.7% (19 of 177 decks)
EDH data for Copper Host Crusher: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 177 real decks.