Woodland Champion
Played in 288 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (10)
- Lonis, Cryptozoologist relevance 2.29 · 2.4% (58 of 2,450 decks)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 1.90 · 2.0% (34 of 1,684 decks)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 1.22 · 1.0% (18 of 1,784 decks)
- The Third Doctor // Martha Jones relevance 0.91 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Clan Crafter relevance 0.70 · 1.2% (4 of 345 decks)
- Duggan, Private Detective relevance 0.64 · 2.7% (2 of 74 decks)
- Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher // Master Chef relevance 0.62 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Master Chef relevance 0.41 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.34 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.33 · 1.4% (1 of 71 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cloakwood Swarmkeeper relevance 1.61 · 24.7% (71 of 288 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.99 · 33.0% (95 of 288 decks)
- Ulvenwald Mysteries relevance 0.87 · 17.4% (50 of 288 decks)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 0.84 · 18.8% (54 of 288 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest relevance 0.84 · 24.0% (69 of 288 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.82 · 27.1% (78 of 288 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.80 · 20.8% (60 of 288 decks)
- Sarinth Steelseeker relevance 0.77 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Wildwood Mentor relevance 0.77 · 11.5% (33 of 288 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.70 · 28.5% (82 of 288 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.68 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Tangletrove Kelp relevance 0.68 · 14.6% (42 of 288 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.68 · 19.4% (56 of 288 decks)
- Gala Greeters relevance 0.66 · 14.9% (43 of 288 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.66 · 15.3% (44 of 288 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.66 · 15.6% (45 of 288 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.63 · 22.2% (64 of 288 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.62 · 14.6% (42 of 288 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.61 · 12.8% (37 of 288 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.61 · 25.7% (74 of 288 decks)
- Wavesifter relevance 0.60 · 12.8% (37 of 288 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.59 · 18.8% (54 of 288 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.58 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 0.57 · 17.0% (49 of 288 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.56 · 13.2% (38 of 288 decks)
- Teething Wurmlet relevance 0.56 · 10.4% (30 of 288 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.56 · 24.0% (69 of 288 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.54 · 18.8% (54 of 288 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.52 · 14.2% (41 of 288 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.51 · 12.2% (35 of 288 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Cloakwood Swarmkeeper relevance 1.61 · 24.7% (71 of 288 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.99 · 33.0% (95 of 288 decks)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 0.84 · 18.8% (54 of 288 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest relevance 0.84 · 24.0% (69 of 288 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.82 · 27.1% (78 of 288 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.80 · 20.8% (60 of 288 decks)
- Sarinth Steelseeker relevance 0.77 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Wildwood Mentor relevance 0.77 · 11.5% (33 of 288 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.70 · 28.5% (82 of 288 decks)
- Tangletrove Kelp relevance 0.68 · 14.6% (42 of 288 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.68 · 19.4% (56 of 288 decks)
- Gala Greeters relevance 0.66 · 14.9% (43 of 288 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.66 · 15.6% (45 of 288 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.63 · 22.2% (64 of 288 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.61 · 12.8% (37 of 288 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.61 · 25.7% (74 of 288 decks)
- Wavesifter relevance 0.60 · 12.8% (37 of 288 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.59 · 18.8% (54 of 288 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.56 · 13.2% (38 of 288 decks)
- Teething Wurmlet relevance 0.56 · 10.4% (30 of 288 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.56 · 24.0% (69 of 288 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.52 · 14.2% (41 of 288 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.51 · 12.2% (35 of 288 decks)
- Thranduil's Company relevance 0.49 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 0.49 · 14.2% (41 of 288 decks)
- Graf Mole relevance 0.49 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.48 · 12.2% (35 of 288 decks)
- Ethereal Investigator relevance 0.48 · 10.4% (30 of 288 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.47 · 37.2% (107 of 288 decks)
- Curiosity Crafter relevance 0.47 · 13.5% (39 of 288 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.46 · 21.5% (62 of 288 decks)
- Silvan Reveler relevance 0.46 · 9.4% (27 of 288 decks)
- Lonis, Genetics Expert relevance 0.46 · 9.4% (27 of 288 decks)
- Prosperous Innkeeper relevance 0.44 · 10.8% (31 of 288 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.43 · 12.8% (37 of 288 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.43 · 11.5% (33 of 288 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.42 · 12.5% (36 of 288 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.68 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.62 · 14.6% (42 of 288 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.58 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 0.57 · 17.0% (49 of 288 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Ulvenwald Mysteries relevance 0.87 · 17.4% (50 of 288 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.49 · 22.2% (64 of 288 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.49 · 16.7% (48 of 288 decks)
- Ongoing Investigation relevance 0.46 · 9.0% (26 of 288 decks)
All instants (2)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.54 · 18.8% (54 of 288 decks)
- Confront the Unknown relevance 0.42 · 7.6% (22 of 288 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.66 · 15.3% (44 of 288 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.50 · 25.3% (73 of 288 decks)
All lands (1)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.50 · 30.9% (89 of 288 decks)
EDH data for Woodland Champion: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 288 real decks.