Impervious Greatwurm
Played in 8,375 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 4.36 · 82.1% (2,031 of 2,473 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 3.13 · 33.3% (1,870 of 5,612 decks)
- Oviya, Automech Artisan relevance 2.98 · 38.7% (860 of 2,224 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 2.35 · 31.6% (322 of 1,019 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 1.76 · 14.4% (507 of 3,523 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 1.68 · 21.3% (136 of 640 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 1.62 · 18.3% (161 of 882 decks)
- Timmy, Power Gamer relevance 1.35 · 42.9% (18 of 42 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 1.24 · 16.0% (64 of 401 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.24 · 11.2% (146 of 1,298 decks)
- Runadi, Behemoth Caller relevance 1.17 · 11.8% (98 of 830 decks)
- Michelangelo, Improviser relevance 1.09 · 14.2% (48 of 339 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 1.07 · 7.6% (229 of 2,997 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.74 · 5.1% (127 of 2,490 decks)
- Tyvar, the Pummeler relevance 0.69 · 8.0% (29 of 363 decks)
- Ghalta the Unstoppable relevance 0.64 · 9.0% (18 of 199 decks)
- Myojin of Life's Web relevance 0.63 · 22.7% (5 of 22 decks)
- Old One Eye relevance 0.60 · 8.9% (15 of 169 decks)
- Nylea, Keen-Eyed relevance 0.59 · 7.5% (20 of 266 decks)
- The Tarrasque relevance 0.59 · 7.1% (22 of 309 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.59 · 6.6% (25 of 376 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.58 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 0.57 · 3.3% (170 of 5,139 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.56 · 5.6% (30 of 535 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Durnan of the Yawning Portal relevance 0.53 · 50.0% (2 of 4 decks)
- Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution relevance 0.53 · 4.7% (39 of 827 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.53 · 6.6% (18 of 274 decks)
- Nylea, God of the Hunt relevance 0.52 · 7.4% (14 of 189 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.47 · 2.5% (194 of 7,843 decks)
- Nissa, Worldsoul Speaker relevance 0.46 · 3.9% (41 of 1,063 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.97 · 71.6% (5,995 of 8,375 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.23 · 39.8% (3,331 of 8,375 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 1.10 · 26.4% (2,212 of 8,375 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 1.01 · 34.4% (2,882 of 8,375 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 0.97 · 22.2% (1,856 of 8,375 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.94 · 50.1% (4,198 of 8,375 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.94 · 23.4% (1,960 of 8,375 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 0.93 · 22.7% (1,905 of 8,375 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.92 · 30.4% (2,550 of 8,375 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.90 · 37.6% (3,152 of 8,375 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 0.89 · 19.3% (1,613 of 8,375 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.89 · 26.3% (2,206 of 8,375 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.89 · 36.7% (3,074 of 8,375 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.88 · 21.2% (1,773 of 8,375 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 0.87 · 29.7% (2,490 of 8,375 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.84 · 29.8% (2,494 of 8,375 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 0.83 · 17.6% (1,475 of 8,375 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 0.82 · 17.9% (1,500 of 8,375 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 0.81 · 17.4% (1,454 of 8,375 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.81 · 35.2% (2,944 of 8,375 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 0.77 · 16.8% (1,404 of 8,375 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.77 · 29.9% (2,508 of 8,375 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.75 · 50.7% (4,245 of 8,375 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 0.75 · 15.2% (1,277 of 8,375 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.74 · 44.8% (3,752 of 8,375 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.73 · 34.2% (2,863 of 8,375 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.73 · 17.6% (1,474 of 8,375 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 0.72 · 16.5% (1,378 of 8,375 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.71 · 42.0% (3,516 of 8,375 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 0.71 · 15.4% (1,288 of 8,375 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.97 · 71.6% (5,995 of 8,375 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 1.10 · 26.4% (2,212 of 8,375 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 1.01 · 34.4% (2,882 of 8,375 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 0.97 · 22.2% (1,856 of 8,375 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.94 · 50.1% (4,198 of 8,375 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.94 · 23.4% (1,960 of 8,375 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 0.93 · 22.7% (1,905 of 8,375 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.92 · 30.4% (2,550 of 8,375 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.90 · 37.6% (3,152 of 8,375 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 0.89 · 19.3% (1,613 of 8,375 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.89 · 26.3% (2,206 of 8,375 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.89 · 36.7% (3,074 of 8,375 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.88 · 21.2% (1,773 of 8,375 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 0.87 · 29.7% (2,490 of 8,375 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.84 · 29.8% (2,494 of 8,375 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 0.83 · 17.6% (1,475 of 8,375 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 0.82 · 17.9% (1,500 of 8,375 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 0.81 · 17.4% (1,454 of 8,375 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.81 · 35.2% (2,944 of 8,375 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 0.77 · 16.8% (1,404 of 8,375 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.77 · 29.9% (2,508 of 8,375 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 0.75 · 15.2% (1,277 of 8,375 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.74 · 44.8% (3,752 of 8,375 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.73 · 34.2% (2,863 of 8,375 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.73 · 17.6% (1,474 of 8,375 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 0.72 · 16.5% (1,378 of 8,375 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.71 · 42.0% (3,516 of 8,375 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 0.71 · 15.4% (1,288 of 8,375 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 0.70 · 15.3% (1,280 of 8,375 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.69 · 28.7% (2,406 of 8,375 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.67 · 18.7% (1,569 of 8,375 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.67 · 20.8% (1,738 of 8,375 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.66 · 19.9% (1,664 of 8,375 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 0.64 · 13.2% (1,104 of 8,375 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.63 · 28.4% (2,376 of 8,375 decks)
- Jaspera Sentinel relevance 0.63 · 16.4% (1,372 of 8,375 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.61 · 16.5% (1,381 of 8,375 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.65 · 18.5% (1,546 of 8,375 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.64 · 17.4% (1,459 of 8,375 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.23 · 39.8% (3,331 of 8,375 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.75 · 50.7% (4,245 of 8,375 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.64 · 18.5% (1,550 of 8,375 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.63 · 31.2% (2,613 of 8,375 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.64 · 29.1% (2,433 of 8,375 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.61 · 25.5% (2,136 of 8,375 decks)
- Crush of Wurms relevance 0.60 · 11.9% (995 of 8,375 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.67 · 26.2% (2,192 of 8,375 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.64 · 49.9% (4,181 of 8,375 decks)
All lands (2)
- Holdout Settlement relevance 0.60 · 15.0% (1,257 of 8,375 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.60 · 14.9% (1,245 of 8,375 decks)
EDH data for Impervious Greatwurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 8,375 real decks.