Glimpse of Nature
Played in 2,877 Golgari decks
Color Identity Spread
21.8% Golgari
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (19)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 2.53 · 5.3% (1,110 of 21,035 decks)
- Davvol, Evincar of Rath relevance 2.13 · 15.4% (49 of 318 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 1.94 · 3.4% (709 of 20,575 decks)
- Tyvar the Bellicose relevance 1.17 · 3.2% (60 of 1,876 decks)
- Grist, Voracious Larva // Grist, the Plague Swarm relevance 1.04 · 2.8% (49 of 1,727 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.00 · 23.5% (4 of 17 decks)
- Witherbloom, the Balancer relevance 0.95 · 1.3% (284 of 21,782 decks)
- Abomination of Llanowar relevance 0.93 · 2.7% (34 of 1,241 decks)
- Honest Rutstein relevance 0.91 · 3.7% (19 of 519 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.83 · 50.0% (2 of 4 decks)
- Blech, Loafing Pest relevance 0.72 · 1.0% (165 of 16,202 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.57 · 4.0% (5 of 126 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.55 · 11.8% (2 of 17 decks)
- Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.47 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Sapling of Colfenor relevance 0.33 · 1.8% (4 of 225 decks)
- Iname as One relevance 0.26 · 1.6% (3 of 188 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Harald, King of Skemfar relevance 0.21 · 1.6% (2 of 125 decks)
- Acornelia, Fashionable Filcher relevance 0.12 · 1.4% (1 of 74 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Heritage Druid relevance 1.50 · 42.5% (1,223 of 2,877 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.48 · 42.5% (1,222 of 2,877 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.43 · 37.5% (1,078 of 2,877 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.35 · 66.2% (1,905 of 2,877 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.34 · 66.4% (1,911 of 2,877 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.33 · 55.0% (1,582 of 2,877 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.32 · 59.4% (1,708 of 2,877 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.27 · 50.4% (1,450 of 2,877 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.27 · 47.5% (1,368 of 2,877 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.25 · 46.5% (1,339 of 2,877 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.24 · 40.6% (1,167 of 2,877 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 1.17 · 35.8% (1,029 of 2,877 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.17 · 49.3% (1,418 of 2,877 decks)
- Tyvar, Jubilant Brawler relevance 1.14 · 38.7% (1,113 of 2,877 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.13 · 40.3% (1,158 of 2,877 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.12 · 54.4% (1,565 of 2,877 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.06 · 61.6% (1,772 of 2,877 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 1.02 · 51.4% (1,478 of 2,877 decks)
- Flourishing Defenses relevance 0.97 · 34.7% (997 of 2,877 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.96 · 35.6% (1,024 of 2,877 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.95 · 23.3% (671 of 2,877 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.93 · 36.5% (1,050 of 2,877 decks)
- Generous Patron relevance 0.89 · 25.9% (744 of 2,877 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.89 · 52.7% (1,517 of 2,877 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.88 · 39.9% (1,148 of 2,877 decks)
- Tyvar the Bellicose relevance 0.88 · 26.5% (762 of 2,877 decks)
- Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.85 · 41.8% (1,202 of 2,877 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.85 · 36.4% (1,046 of 2,877 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 0.83 · 19.8% (570 of 2,877 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.83 · 34.0% (978 of 2,877 decks)
All creatures (33)
- Heritage Druid relevance 1.50 · 42.5% (1,223 of 2,877 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.48 · 42.5% (1,222 of 2,877 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.43 · 37.5% (1,078 of 2,877 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.35 · 66.2% (1,905 of 2,877 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.34 · 66.4% (1,911 of 2,877 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.33 · 55.0% (1,582 of 2,877 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.32 · 59.4% (1,708 of 2,877 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.27 · 50.4% (1,450 of 2,877 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.27 · 47.5% (1,368 of 2,877 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.25 · 46.5% (1,339 of 2,877 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.24 · 40.6% (1,167 of 2,877 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.17 · 49.3% (1,418 of 2,877 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.13 · 40.3% (1,158 of 2,877 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.12 · 54.4% (1,565 of 2,877 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.06 · 61.6% (1,772 of 2,877 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 1.02 · 51.4% (1,478 of 2,877 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.96 · 35.6% (1,024 of 2,877 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.93 · 36.5% (1,050 of 2,877 decks)
- Generous Patron relevance 0.89 · 25.9% (744 of 2,877 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.89 · 52.7% (1,517 of 2,877 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.88 · 39.9% (1,148 of 2,877 decks)
- Tyvar the Bellicose relevance 0.88 · 26.5% (762 of 2,877 decks)
- Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.85 · 41.8% (1,202 of 2,877 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 0.83 · 19.8% (570 of 2,877 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.83 · 34.0% (978 of 2,877 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.83 · 29.0% (835 of 2,877 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.83 · 24.4% (702 of 2,877 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.82 · 43.5% (1,252 of 2,877 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.80 · 27.2% (783 of 2,877 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.80 · 28.7% (825 of 2,877 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.76 · 28.3% (814 of 2,877 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.76 · 22.3% (642 of 2,877 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 0.75 · 15.3% (441 of 2,877 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Staff of Domination relevance 1.17 · 35.8% (1,029 of 2,877 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.95 · 23.3% (671 of 2,877 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Flourishing Defenses relevance 0.97 · 34.7% (997 of 2,877 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.81 · 29.1% (836 of 2,877 decks)
All instants (3)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.82 · 34.1% (981 of 2,877 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.79 · 30.3% (873 of 2,877 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.79 · 30.3% (871 of 2,877 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.85 · 36.4% (1,046 of 2,877 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.80 · 25.2% (724 of 2,877 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.78 · 29.4% (847 of 2,877 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Tyvar, Jubilant Brawler relevance 1.14 · 38.7% (1,113 of 2,877 decks)
- Tyvar Kell relevance 0.78 · 29.2% (841 of 2,877 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 1.31 · 45.2% (1,301 of 2,877 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.88 · 32.1% (923 of 2,877 decks)
- Nurturing Peatland relevance 0.78 · 36.7% (1,057 of 2,877 decks)
All lands (2)
- Gilt-Leaf Palace relevance 1.30 · 45.5% (1,308 of 2,877 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.83 · 35.9% (1,033 of 2,877 decks)
EDH data for Glimpse of Nature: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 2,877 real decks.