Naya Soulbeast
Played in 85 Green decks
730+46+1+3+
Color Identity Spread
17.2% Green
Commanders
Runadi, Behemoth Caller 1.1% of decks
Runadi, Behemoth Caller 1.1% of decks
Hua Tuo, Honored Physician 2.0% of decks
Hua Tuo, Honored Physician 2.0% of decks
Toph, the Blind Bandit 1.1% of decks
Toph, the Blind Bandit 1.1% of decks
Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Halana, Kessig Ranger 4.5% of decks
Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Halana, Kessig Ranger 4.5% of decks
Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Acolyte of Bahamut 2.9% of decks
Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Acolyte of Bahamut 2.9% of decks
Kurbis, Harvest Celebrant 2.5% of decks
Kurbis, Harvest Celebrant 2.5% of decks
Most Relevant
Garruk's Horde 23.5% of decks
Garruk's Horde 23.5% of decks
Titanoth Rex 24.7% of decks
Titanoth Rex 24.7% of decks
Krosan Warchief 14.1% of decks
Krosan Warchief 14.1% of decks
Kalonian Behemoth 14.1% of decks
Kalonian Behemoth 14.1% of decks
Giant Ankheg 24.7% of decks
Giant Ankheg 24.7% of decks
Siege Behemoth 17.6% of decks
Siege Behemoth 17.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (7)
- Runadi, Behemoth Caller relevance 1.42 · 1.1% (9 of 830 decks)
- Hua Tuo, Honored Physician relevance 1.02 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Toph, the Blind Bandit relevance 0.67 · 1.1% (2 of 189 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.61 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.56 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Kurbis, Harvest Celebrant relevance 0.54 · 2.5% (1 of 40 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 0.44 · 1.2% (1 of 84 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 1.12 · 23.5% (20 of 85 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 1.07 · 24.7% (21 of 85 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 0.97 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Kalonian Behemoth relevance 0.95 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.92 · 24.7% (21 of 85 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 0.83 · 17.6% (15 of 85 decks)
- Living Hive relevance 0.78 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Plated Crusher relevance 0.76 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Krosan Cloudscraper relevance 0.76 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.74 · 30.6% (26 of 85 decks)
- Ancient Imperiosaur relevance 0.73 · 15.3% (13 of 85 decks)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 0.72 · 16.5% (14 of 85 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 0.72 · 17.6% (15 of 85 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.70 · 16.5% (14 of 85 decks)
- Ancient Ooze relevance 0.70 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.70 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.68 · 23.5% (20 of 85 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 0.68 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 0.67 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Rust Goliath relevance 0.67 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Nessian Game Warden relevance 0.67 · 10.6% (9 of 85 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.67 · 35.3% (30 of 85 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.66 · 38.8% (33 of 85 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.65 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.65 · 17.6% (15 of 85 decks)
- Canopy Gargantuan relevance 0.64 · 17.6% (15 of 85 decks)
- Rampaging Brontodon relevance 0.63 · 15.3% (13 of 85 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 0.62 · 15.3% (13 of 85 decks)
- Hierophant Bio-Titan relevance 0.61 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Myojin of Life's Web relevance 0.61 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
All creatures (46)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 1.12 · 23.5% (20 of 85 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 1.07 · 24.7% (21 of 85 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 0.97 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Kalonian Behemoth relevance 0.95 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.92 · 24.7% (21 of 85 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 0.83 · 17.6% (15 of 85 decks)
- Living Hive relevance 0.78 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Plated Crusher relevance 0.76 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Krosan Cloudscraper relevance 0.76 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.74 · 30.6% (26 of 85 decks)
- Ancient Imperiosaur relevance 0.73 · 15.3% (13 of 85 decks)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 0.72 · 16.5% (14 of 85 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 0.72 · 17.6% (15 of 85 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.70 · 16.5% (14 of 85 decks)
- Ancient Ooze relevance 0.70 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.70 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.68 · 23.5% (20 of 85 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 0.68 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 0.67 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Rust Goliath relevance 0.67 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Nessian Game Warden relevance 0.67 · 10.6% (9 of 85 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.67 · 35.3% (30 of 85 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.66 · 38.8% (33 of 85 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.65 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.65 · 17.6% (15 of 85 decks)
- Canopy Gargantuan relevance 0.64 · 17.6% (15 of 85 decks)
- Rampaging Brontodon relevance 0.63 · 15.3% (13 of 85 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 0.62 · 15.3% (13 of 85 decks)
- Hierophant Bio-Titan relevance 0.61 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Myojin of Life's Web relevance 0.61 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Leatherhead, Iron Gator relevance 0.59 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.59 · 22.4% (19 of 85 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.59 · 24.7% (21 of 85 decks)
- Paragon of Eternal Wilds relevance 0.58 · 10.6% (9 of 85 decks)
- Copper Host Crusher relevance 0.58 · 15.3% (13 of 85 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.58 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.57 · 22.4% (19 of 85 decks)
- Myojin of Towering Might relevance 0.57 · 10.6% (9 of 85 decks)
- Quirion Beastcaller relevance 0.56 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Foe-Razer Regent relevance 0.56 · 10.6% (9 of 85 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 0.53 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Razorclaw Bear relevance 0.52 · 9.4% (8 of 85 decks)
- The Tarrasque relevance 0.52 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Druid's Familiar relevance 0.51 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Terra Stomper relevance 0.51 · 9.4% (8 of 85 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.51 · 10.6% (9 of 85 decks)
All instants (1)
- Awaken the Bear relevance 0.54 · 10.6% (9 of 85 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.57 · 18.8% (16 of 85 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.54 · 20.0% (17 of 85 decks)
- Wave of Vitriol relevance 0.52 · 10.6% (9 of 85 decks)
EDH data for Naya Soulbeast: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 85 real decks.





















