Ancient Ooze

Played in 2,507 decks

Ancient Ooze
$1.47 €0.83

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Uugguu, the Omniplasm relevance 4.37 · 15.3% (696 of 4,540 decks)
  2. Aeve, Progenitor Ooze relevance 4.18 · 16.7% (433 of 2,596 decks)
  3. Umori, the Collector relevance 3.86 · 8.0% (42 of 526 decks)
  4. Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 3.07 · 3.5% (62 of 1,786 decks)
  5. Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 2.42 · 4.4% (13 of 293 decks)
  6. Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 2.33 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
  7. The Mimeoplasm relevance 2.26 · 4.4% (158 of 3,591 decks)
  8. Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 2.22 · 2.8% (28 of 985 decks)
  9. Experiment Kraj relevance 2.15 · 3.1% (23 of 742 decks)
  10. It Came from Planet Glurg relevance 1.95 · 7.8% (9 of 115 decks)
  11. Mimeoplasm, Revered One relevance 1.86 · 4.7% (58 of 1,239 decks)
  12. Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 1.70 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
  13. Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Guild Artisan relevance 1.57 · 7.1% (5 of 70 decks)
  14. Iname as One relevance 1.49 · 2.9% (5 of 175 decks)
  15. Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 1.46 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
  16. Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 1.39 · 44.4% (4 of 9 decks)
  17. Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.32 · 21.7% (5 of 23 decks)
  18. Maular, the Next Evolution relevance 1.21 · 2.2% (35 of 1,571 decks)
  19. Oviya, Automech Artisan relevance 0.99 · 1.5% (32 of 2,081 decks)
  20. Nocturno of Myra's Marvels // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.95 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
  21. Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 0.93 · 5.1% (6 of 117 decks)
  22. Kaysa relevance 0.90 · 6.0% (5 of 84 decks)
  23. Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 0.90 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
  24. Felix Five-Boots relevance 0.87 · 1.2% (33 of 2,648 decks)
  25. Vial Smasher the Fierce // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.82 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
  26. Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.79 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
  27. Michelangelo, the Heart relevance 0.77 · 5.2% (4 of 77 decks)
  28. Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.77 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
  29. Yoshimaru, Ever Faithful // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.77 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
  30. Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.76 · 2.0% (10 of 511 decks)

Parallel Cards

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
All parallel cards (2)
  1. Towering Gibbon
  2. Scion of the Wild

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Biowaste Blob
    3.92 64.0%
    $0.45 €0.43
  • Ravenous Slime
    3.84 56.2%
    $2.24 €1.00
  • Biogenic Ooze
    3.83 65.1%
    $0.29 €0.19
  • Mitotic Slime
    3.73 58.3%
    $0.41 €0.33
  • Predator Ooze
    3.73 60.6%
    $0.25 €0.25
  • Oran-Rief Ooze
    3.66 56.9%
    $0.30 €0.10
  • Slurrk, All-Ingesting
    3.44 50.7%
    $0.34 €0.21
  • Consuming Blob
    3.27 45.2%
    $0.47 €0.42
  • Green Slime
    3.10 51.8%
    $1.92 €1.68
  • Corrosive Ooze
    3.08 39.7%
    $0.17 €0.14
All most relevant (30)
  1. Biowaste Blob relevance 3.92 · 64.0% (1,605 of 2,507 decks)
  2. Ravenous Slime relevance 3.84 · 56.2% (1,409 of 2,507 decks)
  3. Biogenic Ooze relevance 3.83 · 65.1% (1,631 of 2,507 decks)
  4. Mitotic Slime relevance 3.73 · 58.3% (1,461 of 2,507 decks)
  5. Predator Ooze relevance 3.73 · 60.6% (1,519 of 2,507 decks)
  6. Oran-Rief Ooze relevance 3.66 · 56.9% (1,426 of 2,507 decks)
  7. Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 3.44 · 50.7% (1,272 of 2,507 decks)
  8. Consuming Blob relevance 3.27 · 45.2% (1,134 of 2,507 decks)
  9. Green Slime relevance 3.10 · 51.8% (1,298 of 2,507 decks)
  10. Corrosive Ooze relevance 3.08 · 39.7% (996 of 2,507 decks)
  11. Ochre Jelly relevance 3.06 · 49.4% (1,238 of 2,507 decks)
  12. Experiment One relevance 3.05 · 44.0% (1,104 of 2,507 decks)
  13. Manaplasm relevance 3.03 · 38.1% (955 of 2,507 decks)
  14. Splitting Slime relevance 2.99 · 38.1% (954 of 2,507 decks)
  15. Aeve, Progenitor Ooze relevance 2.97 · 44.5% (1,116 of 2,507 decks)
  16. Inexorable Blob relevance 2.92 · 37.5% (939 of 2,507 decks)
  17. Acidic Slime relevance 2.80 · 59.9% (1,502 of 2,507 decks)
  18. Gluttonous Slime relevance 2.64 · 33.3% (834 of 2,507 decks)
  19. Gutter Grime relevance 2.64 · 36.2% (908 of 2,507 decks)
  20. March of the World Ooze relevance 2.54 · 45.2% (1,132 of 2,507 decks)
  21. Temperamental Oozewagg relevance 2.53 · 36.4% (913 of 2,507 decks)
  22. Gelatinous Cube relevance 2.53 · 35.0% (878 of 2,507 decks)
  23. Scavenging Ooze relevance 2.45 · 51.7% (1,295 of 2,507 decks)
  24. Uchuulon relevance 2.13 · 37.1% (929 of 2,507 decks)
  25. Umori, the Collector relevance 2.10 · 30.6% (766 of 2,507 decks)
  26. Experiment Kraj relevance 1.99 · 28.6% (717 of 2,507 decks)
  27. Gobbling Ooze relevance 1.97 · 23.3% (583 of 2,507 decks)
  28. Gelatinous Genesis relevance 1.88 · 30.0% (752 of 2,507 decks)
  29. Necrotic Ooze relevance 1.87 · 33.0% (828 of 2,507 decks)
  30. Miming Slime relevance 1.86 · 24.1% (604 of 2,507 decks)

Creatures

40

Showing 1-10 of 40

Page size
  • Biowaste Blob
    3.92 64.0%
    $0.45 €0.43
  • Ravenous Slime
    3.84 56.2%
    $2.24 €1.00
  • Biogenic Ooze
    3.83 65.1%
    $0.29 €0.19
  • Mitotic Slime
    3.73 58.3%
    $0.41 €0.33
  • Predator Ooze
    3.73 60.6%
    $0.25 €0.25
  • Oran-Rief Ooze
    3.66 56.9%
    $0.30 €0.10
  • Slurrk, All-Ingesting
    3.44 50.7%
    $0.34 €0.21
  • Consuming Blob
    3.27 45.2%
    $0.47 €0.42
  • Green Slime
    3.10 51.8%
    $1.92 €1.68
  • Corrosive Ooze
    3.08 39.7%
    $0.17 €0.14
All creatures (40)
  1. Biowaste Blob relevance 3.92 · 64.0% (1,605 of 2,507 decks)
  2. Ravenous Slime relevance 3.84 · 56.2% (1,409 of 2,507 decks)
  3. Biogenic Ooze relevance 3.83 · 65.1% (1,631 of 2,507 decks)
  4. Mitotic Slime relevance 3.73 · 58.3% (1,461 of 2,507 decks)
  5. Predator Ooze relevance 3.73 · 60.6% (1,519 of 2,507 decks)
  6. Oran-Rief Ooze relevance 3.66 · 56.9% (1,426 of 2,507 decks)
  7. Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 3.44 · 50.7% (1,272 of 2,507 decks)
  8. Consuming Blob relevance 3.27 · 45.2% (1,134 of 2,507 decks)
  9. Green Slime relevance 3.10 · 51.8% (1,298 of 2,507 decks)
  10. Corrosive Ooze relevance 3.08 · 39.7% (996 of 2,507 decks)
  11. Ochre Jelly relevance 3.06 · 49.4% (1,238 of 2,507 decks)
  12. Experiment One relevance 3.05 · 44.0% (1,104 of 2,507 decks)
  13. Manaplasm relevance 3.03 · 38.1% (955 of 2,507 decks)
  14. Splitting Slime relevance 2.99 · 38.1% (954 of 2,507 decks)
  15. Aeve, Progenitor Ooze relevance 2.97 · 44.5% (1,116 of 2,507 decks)
  16. Inexorable Blob relevance 2.92 · 37.5% (939 of 2,507 decks)
  17. Acidic Slime relevance 2.80 · 59.9% (1,502 of 2,507 decks)
  18. Gluttonous Slime relevance 2.64 · 33.3% (834 of 2,507 decks)
  19. Temperamental Oozewagg relevance 2.53 · 36.4% (913 of 2,507 decks)
  20. Gelatinous Cube relevance 2.53 · 35.0% (878 of 2,507 decks)
  21. Scavenging Ooze relevance 2.45 · 51.7% (1,295 of 2,507 decks)
  22. Uchuulon relevance 2.13 · 37.1% (929 of 2,507 decks)
  23. Umori, the Collector relevance 2.10 · 30.6% (766 of 2,507 decks)
  24. Experiment Kraj relevance 1.99 · 28.6% (717 of 2,507 decks)
  25. Gobbling Ooze relevance 1.97 · 23.3% (583 of 2,507 decks)
  26. Necrotic Ooze relevance 1.87 · 33.0% (828 of 2,507 decks)
  27. Expanding Ooze relevance 1.72 · 21.7% (545 of 2,507 decks)
  28. Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 1.66 · 27.1% (679 of 2,507 decks)
  29. The Mimeoplasm relevance 1.56 · 23.4% (586 of 2,507 decks)
  30. Ooze Patrol relevance 1.52 · 18.3% (459 of 2,507 decks)
  31. Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.32 · 21.1% (528 of 2,507 decks)
  32. Kinetic Ooze relevance 1.30 · 23.3% (584 of 2,507 decks)
  33. Hecteyes relevance 1.28 · 21.6% (542 of 2,507 decks)
  34. Necroplasm relevance 1.19 · 15.6% (390 of 2,507 decks)
  35. Mimeoplasm, Revered One relevance 1.17 · 14.5% (364 of 2,507 decks)
  36. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 1.15 · 16.0% (400 of 2,507 decks)
  37. Printlifter Ooze relevance 1.13 · 16.8% (421 of 2,507 decks)
  38. Bioplasm relevance 1.02 · 10.6% (266 of 2,507 decks)
  39. Consumptive Goo relevance 1.00 · 10.8% (272 of 2,507 decks)
  40. Slick Imitator relevance 0.96 · 12.6% (316 of 2,507 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Gutter Grime
    2.64 36.2%
    $0.38 €0.29
  • March of the World Ooze
    2.54 45.2%
    $2.49 €1.67
  • Ooze Flux
    1.78 22.3%
    $0.30 €0.22
All enchantments (3)
  1. Gutter Grime relevance 2.64 · 36.2% (908 of 2,507 decks)
  2. March of the World Ooze relevance 2.54 · 45.2% (1,132 of 2,507 decks)
  3. Ooze Flux relevance 1.78 · 22.3% (559 of 2,507 decks)

Instants

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Mystic Genesis
    1.24 15.0%
    $0.17 €0.16
  • Voidslime
    1.09 18.8%
    $0.60 €0.37
All instants (2)
  1. Mystic Genesis relevance 1.24 · 15.0% (376 of 2,507 decks)
  2. Voidslime relevance 1.09 · 18.8% (471 of 2,507 decks)

Sorceries

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Gelatinous Genesis
    1.88 30.0%
    $0.60 €0.28
  • Miming Slime
    1.86 24.1%
    $0.34 €0.15
  • Slime Molding
    1.64 20.5%
    $0.23 €0.13
  • Slime Against Humanity
    1.60 25.0%
    $1.39 €0.94
  • Convert to Slime
    1.26 18.7%
    $0.35 €0.19
All sorceries (5)
  1. Gelatinous Genesis relevance 1.88 · 30.0% (752 of 2,507 decks)
  2. Miming Slime relevance 1.86 · 24.1% (604 of 2,507 decks)
  3. Slime Molding relevance 1.64 · 20.5% (515 of 2,507 decks)
  4. Slime Against Humanity relevance 1.60 · 25.0% (626 of 2,507 decks)
  5. Convert to Slime relevance 1.26 · 18.7% (470 of 2,507 decks)

EDH data for Ancient Ooze: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 2,507 real decks.