Centaur Garden
Played in 150 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
3.0% Simic
-
Abzan 2,773 · 56.4%
-
Green 692 · 14.1%
-
Selesnya 503 · 10.2%
-
Gruul 237 · 4.8%
-
Golgari 231 · 4.7%
-
Simic 150 · 3.0%
- Other (12) 333 · 6.8%
828+14+1+6+7+16+6+
That's every commander.
All commanders (8)
- Wilson, Refined Grizzly // Candlekeep Sage relevance 1.98 · 23.8% (5 of 21 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 1.91 · 2.1% (18 of 875 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 1.09 · 4.3% (3 of 69 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 1.00 · 3.1% (3 of 98 decks)
- Pippa, Duchess of Dice relevance 0.89 · 5.0% (2 of 40 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Shameless Charlatan relevance 0.60 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.54 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Dungeon Delver // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.53 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
All most relevant (28)
- Hermit Druid relevance 0.92 · 18.7% (28 of 150 decks)
- Arcane Endeavor relevance 0.72 · 10.7% (16 of 150 decks)
- Mesmeric Orb relevance 0.61 · 12.7% (19 of 150 decks)
- Coastal Breach relevance 0.60 · 10.7% (16 of 150 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.60 · 10.7% (16 of 150 decks)
- Spellgyre relevance 0.59 · 10.0% (15 of 150 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.57 · 17.3% (26 of 150 decks)
- Chrome Host Seedshark relevance 0.56 · 10.0% (15 of 150 decks)
- Into the Story relevance 0.55 · 10.7% (16 of 150 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.54 · 26.7% (40 of 150 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.53 · 20.0% (30 of 150 decks)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.52 · 10.0% (15 of 150 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.52 · 12.0% (18 of 150 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.51 · 12.7% (19 of 150 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (12 of 150 decks)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 0.50 · 10.0% (15 of 150 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.50 · 17.3% (26 of 150 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.49 · 11.3% (17 of 150 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.49 · 17.3% (26 of 150 decks)
- Traumatize relevance 0.49 · 10.0% (15 of 150 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.49 · 14.0% (21 of 150 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.49 · 12.0% (18 of 150 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.49 · 8.7% (13 of 150 decks)
- Six relevance 0.48 · 12.0% (18 of 150 decks)
- Beneath the Sands relevance 0.47 · 7.3% (11 of 150 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.47 · 12.0% (18 of 150 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.47 · 36.7% (55 of 150 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.47 · 13.3% (20 of 150 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Hermit Druid relevance 0.92 · 18.7% (28 of 150 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.57 · 17.3% (26 of 150 decks)
- Chrome Host Seedshark relevance 0.56 · 10.0% (15 of 150 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.54 · 26.7% (40 of 150 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.52 · 12.0% (18 of 150 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.51 · 12.7% (19 of 150 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (12 of 150 decks)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 0.50 · 10.0% (15 of 150 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.50 · 17.3% (26 of 150 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.49 · 17.3% (26 of 150 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.49 · 14.0% (21 of 150 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.49 · 8.7% (13 of 150 decks)
- Six relevance 0.48 · 12.0% (18 of 150 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.47 · 36.7% (55 of 150 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Mesmeric Orb relevance 0.61 · 12.7% (19 of 150 decks)
All instants (6)
- Berserk relevance 0.60 · 10.7% (16 of 150 decks)
- Spellgyre relevance 0.59 · 10.0% (15 of 150 decks)
- Into the Story relevance 0.55 · 10.7% (16 of 150 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.53 · 20.0% (30 of 150 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.49 · 11.3% (17 of 150 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.47 · 13.3% (20 of 150 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Arcane Endeavor relevance 0.72 · 10.7% (16 of 150 decks)
- Coastal Breach relevance 0.60 · 10.7% (16 of 150 decks)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.52 · 10.0% (15 of 150 decks)
- Traumatize relevance 0.49 · 10.0% (15 of 150 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.49 · 12.0% (18 of 150 decks)
- Beneath the Sands relevance 0.47 · 7.3% (11 of 150 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.47 · 12.0% (18 of 150 decks)
All utility lands (16)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 1.86 · 54.7% (82 of 150 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 1.44 · 34.0% (51 of 150 decks)
- Ipnu Rivulet relevance 1.35 · 25.3% (38 of 150 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.94 · 55.3% (83 of 150 decks)
- Okina, Temple to the Grandfathers relevance 0.80 · 13.3% (20 of 150 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.74 · 20.7% (31 of 150 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.69 · 15.3% (23 of 150 decks)
- Pendelhaven relevance 0.68 · 12.0% (18 of 150 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.64 · 17.3% (26 of 150 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.64 · 18.7% (28 of 150 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.61 · 22.0% (33 of 150 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.56 · 15.3% (23 of 150 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.53 · 17.3% (26 of 150 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.51 · 15.3% (23 of 150 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.47 · 14.0% (21 of 150 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.47 · 12.0% (18 of 150 decks)
All lands (6)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.71 · 34.0% (51 of 150 decks)
- Gemstone Mine relevance 0.51 · 8.7% (13 of 150 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.50 · 9.3% (14 of 150 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.49 · 28.7% (43 of 150 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.48 · 14.7% (22 of 150 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.47 · 35.3% (53 of 150 decks)
EDH data for Centaur Garden: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 150 real decks.




























































