Wirewood Elf
Played in 108 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
3.6% Selesnya
730+45+1+1+1+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (7)
- Sir Shandlar of Eberyn relevance 0.98 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Emmara Tandris relevance 0.97 · 2.5% (3 of 119 decks)
- Radiant, Serra Archangel // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.75 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Lord Magnus relevance 0.62 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Noble Heritage relevance 0.59 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Lila, Hospitality Hostess relevance 0.51 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Chorus of the Conclave relevance 0.40 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.80 · 49.1% (53 of 108 decks)
- Quirion Elves relevance 1.37 · 23.1% (25 of 108 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 1.32 · 24.1% (26 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.27 · 31.5% (34 of 108 decks)
- Leaf Gilder relevance 1.21 · 18.5% (20 of 108 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.07 · 24.1% (26 of 108 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.01 · 37.0% (40 of 108 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.98 · 20.4% (22 of 108 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.95 · 16.7% (18 of 108 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 0.93 · 17.6% (19 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.85 · 16.7% (18 of 108 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.85 · 38.9% (42 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 0.84 · 13.9% (15 of 108 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.80 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.79 · 51.9% (56 of 108 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.72 · 13.9% (15 of 108 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.71 · 13.9% (15 of 108 decks)
- Greenweaver Druid relevance 0.69 · 10.2% (11 of 108 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.69 · 12.0% (13 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 0.67 · 13.0% (14 of 108 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.65 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.64 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.64 · 12.0% (13 of 108 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 0.64 · 10.2% (11 of 108 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.63 · 14.8% (16 of 108 decks)
- Viridian Joiner relevance 0.63 · 10.2% (11 of 108 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.63 · 11.1% (12 of 108 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.63 · 12.0% (13 of 108 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 0.60 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.60 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
All creatures (45)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.80 · 49.1% (53 of 108 decks)
- Quirion Elves relevance 1.37 · 23.1% (25 of 108 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 1.32 · 24.1% (26 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.27 · 31.5% (34 of 108 decks)
- Leaf Gilder relevance 1.21 · 18.5% (20 of 108 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.07 · 24.1% (26 of 108 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.01 · 37.0% (40 of 108 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.98 · 20.4% (22 of 108 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.95 · 16.7% (18 of 108 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 0.93 · 17.6% (19 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.85 · 16.7% (18 of 108 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.85 · 38.9% (42 of 108 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.80 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.79 · 51.9% (56 of 108 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.72 · 13.9% (15 of 108 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.71 · 13.9% (15 of 108 decks)
- Greenweaver Druid relevance 0.69 · 10.2% (11 of 108 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.69 · 12.0% (13 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 0.67 · 13.0% (14 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.64 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.64 · 12.0% (13 of 108 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 0.64 · 10.2% (11 of 108 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.63 · 14.8% (16 of 108 decks)
- Viridian Joiner relevance 0.63 · 10.2% (11 of 108 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.63 · 11.1% (12 of 108 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.63 · 12.0% (13 of 108 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 0.60 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.60 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.60 · 13.9% (15 of 108 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.59 · 10.2% (11 of 108 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.59 · 11.1% (12 of 108 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.59 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.58 · 14.8% (16 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.56 · 10.2% (11 of 108 decks)
- Wirewood Herald relevance 0.56 · 8.3% (9 of 108 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elder relevance 0.55 · 8.3% (9 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.54 · 11.1% (12 of 108 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.54 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.53 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.52 · 26.9% (29 of 108 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.51 · 17.6% (19 of 108 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.50 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.48 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.47 · 8.3% (9 of 108 decks)
- Whisperer of the Wilds relevance 0.46 · 9.3% (10 of 108 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 0.84 · 13.9% (15 of 108 decks)
All instants (1)
- Fog relevance 0.57 · 20.4% (22 of 108 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.65 · 15.7% (17 of 108 decks)
All lands (2)
- Elfhame Palace relevance 0.50 · 13.0% (14 of 108 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.46 · 14.8% (16 of 108 decks)
EDH data for Wirewood Elf: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 108 real decks.


































