Harrier Naga
Played in 250 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
66.0% Green
- Green 250 · 66.0%
- Selesnya 74 · 19.5%
- Golgari 32 · 8.4%
- Other (11) 23 · 6.1%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (4)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 4.86 · 14.4% (223 of 1,545 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.79 · 7.6% (9 of 119 decks)
- Sosuke, Son of Seshiro relevance 0.39 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- God-Eternal Rhonas relevance 0.38 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Murasa Brute relevance 4.08 · 66.0% (165 of 250 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 3.99 · 80.0% (200 of 250 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 3.80 · 80.4% (201 of 250 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 3.77 · 71.2% (178 of 250 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 3.72 · 62.0% (155 of 250 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 3.57 · 67.2% (168 of 250 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 3.45 · 64.0% (160 of 250 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 3.42 · 64.8% (162 of 250 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 3.41 · 61.6% (154 of 250 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 3.39 · 50.8% (127 of 250 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 3.39 · 67.2% (168 of 250 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 3.31 · 64.4% (161 of 250 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 3.29 · 74.8% (187 of 250 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 3.21 · 48.4% (121 of 250 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 3.15 · 53.2% (133 of 250 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 3.01 · 54.0% (135 of 250 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 2.98 · 47.6% (119 of 250 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 2.97 · 46.8% (117 of 250 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 2.93 · 57.6% (144 of 250 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 2.89 · 57.6% (144 of 250 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.81 · 74.8% (187 of 250 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.67 · 73.2% (183 of 250 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 2.64 · 49.6% (124 of 250 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.49 · 87.6% (219 of 250 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 2.45 · 38.0% (95 of 250 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.43 · 66.8% (167 of 250 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 2.23 · 34.8% (87 of 250 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 2.18 · 35.2% (88 of 250 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 2.05 · 36.0% (90 of 250 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 2.01 · 59.6% (149 of 250 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Murasa Brute relevance 4.08 · 66.0% (165 of 250 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 3.99 · 80.0% (200 of 250 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 3.80 · 80.4% (201 of 250 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 3.77 · 71.2% (178 of 250 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 3.72 · 62.0% (155 of 250 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 3.57 · 67.2% (168 of 250 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 3.45 · 64.0% (160 of 250 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 3.42 · 64.8% (162 of 250 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 3.41 · 61.6% (154 of 250 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 3.39 · 50.8% (127 of 250 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 3.39 · 67.2% (168 of 250 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 3.31 · 64.4% (161 of 250 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 3.21 · 48.4% (121 of 250 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 3.15 · 53.2% (133 of 250 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 3.01 · 54.0% (135 of 250 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 2.98 · 47.6% (119 of 250 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 2.97 · 46.8% (117 of 250 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 2.93 · 57.6% (144 of 250 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 2.89 · 57.6% (144 of 250 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.81 · 74.8% (187 of 250 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.67 · 73.2% (183 of 250 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 2.64 · 49.6% (124 of 250 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.49 · 87.6% (219 of 250 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 2.45 · 38.0% (95 of 250 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.43 · 66.8% (167 of 250 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 2.23 · 34.8% (87 of 250 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 2.18 · 35.2% (88 of 250 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 2.05 · 36.0% (90 of 250 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 2.01 · 59.6% (149 of 250 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 2.00 · 31.2% (78 of 250 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 1.98 · 31.6% (79 of 250 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.96 · 56.0% (140 of 250 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 1.95 · 29.6% (74 of 250 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 1.94 · 29.6% (74 of 250 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 1.63 · 44.4% (111 of 250 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 1.58 · 44.8% (112 of 250 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 1.18 · 19.2% (48 of 250 decks)
- Broodhunter Wurm relevance 1.07 · 16.4% (41 of 250 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.99 · 26.8% (67 of 250 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Hall of Triumph relevance 1.48 · 28.4% (71 of 250 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 1.02 · 29.2% (73 of 250 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 3.29 · 74.8% (187 of 250 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 1.98 · 44.0% (110 of 250 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 1.51 · 62.0% (155 of 250 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.05 · 34.0% (85 of 250 decks)
All instants (1)
- Curious Herd relevance 1.01 · 17.2% (43 of 250 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 1.26 · 27.6% (69 of 250 decks)
- Mouth // Feed relevance 1.05 · 19.2% (48 of 250 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.99 · 43.2% (108 of 250 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 1.07 · 42.0% (105 of 250 decks)
EDH data for Harrier Naga: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 250 real decks.