Color Identity Spread
3
All commanders (3)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 2.52 · 1.0% (23 of 2,200 decks)
- Kogla and Yidaro relevance 0.88 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 0.87 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
20
All parallel cards (20)
- Johtull Wurm
- Goblin Elite Infantry
- Plague Wight
- Slinking Giant
- Quagmire Lamprey
- Brushwagg
- Leery Fogbeast
- Gang of Elk
- Spitting Slug
- Rabid Elephant
- Norwood Warrior
- Elvish Berserker
- Hezrou // Demonic Stench
- Rampaging Cyclops
- Nessian Boar
- Rabid Wolverines
- Talruum Champion
- Deepwood Wolverine
- Flailing Drake
- Deeproot Warrior
30
All most relevant (30)
- Elfhame Wurm relevance 4.73 · 56.4% (22 of 39 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 4.57 · 61.5% (24 of 39 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 4.46 · 69.2% (27 of 39 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 4.13 · 66.7% (26 of 39 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 3.95 · 56.4% (22 of 39 decks)
- Hazard of the Dunes relevance 3.78 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 3.77 · 53.8% (21 of 39 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 3.71 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 3.66 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Iron-Craw Crusher relevance 3.66 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Broodhunter Wurm relevance 3.60 · 38.5% (15 of 39 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 3.55 · 48.7% (19 of 39 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 3.35 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 3.22 · 51.3% (20 of 39 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 3.15 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Pouncing Wurm relevance 3.15 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 3.11 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 3.11 · 48.7% (19 of 39 decks)
- Johtull Wurm relevance 3.10 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 3.02 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 3.00 · 51.3% (20 of 39 decks)
- Plated Wurm relevance 2.83 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 2.80 · 53.8% (21 of 39 decks)
- Duskdale Wurm relevance 2.76 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Argothian Wurm relevance 2.75 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Deathcoil Wurm relevance 2.74 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 2.70 · 35.9% (14 of 39 decks)
- Carnage Wurm relevance 2.66 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Symbiotic Wurm relevance 2.64 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Pathbreaker Wurm relevance 2.55 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
49
All creatures (49)
- Elfhame Wurm relevance 4.73 · 56.4% (22 of 39 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 4.57 · 61.5% (24 of 39 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 4.46 · 69.2% (27 of 39 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 4.13 · 66.7% (26 of 39 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 3.95 · 56.4% (22 of 39 decks)
- Hazard of the Dunes relevance 3.78 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 3.77 · 53.8% (21 of 39 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 3.71 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 3.66 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Iron-Craw Crusher relevance 3.66 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Broodhunter Wurm relevance 3.60 · 38.5% (15 of 39 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 3.55 · 48.7% (19 of 39 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 3.35 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 3.22 · 51.3% (20 of 39 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 3.15 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Pouncing Wurm relevance 3.15 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 3.11 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 3.11 · 48.7% (19 of 39 decks)
- Johtull Wurm relevance 3.10 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 3.02 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 3.00 · 51.3% (20 of 39 decks)
- Plated Wurm relevance 2.83 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 2.80 · 53.8% (21 of 39 decks)
- Duskdale Wurm relevance 2.76 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Argothian Wurm relevance 2.75 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Deathcoil Wurm relevance 2.74 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 2.70 · 35.9% (14 of 39 decks)
- Carnage Wurm relevance 2.66 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Symbiotic Wurm relevance 2.64 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Pathbreaker Wurm relevance 2.55 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 2.55 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Battering Wurm relevance 2.54 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Ravenous Lindwurm relevance 2.50 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Arrogant Wurm relevance 2.48 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 2.46 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Tunneler Wurm relevance 2.41 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- Roaring Slagwurm relevance 2.39 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Germinating Wurm relevance 2.38 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Gravetiller Wurm relevance 2.38 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 2.36 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 2.36 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 2.35 · 48.7% (19 of 39 decks)
- Fallow Wurm relevance 2.35 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Boneyard Wurm relevance 2.34 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Witherscale Wurm relevance 2.25 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Teething Wurmlet relevance 2.17 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Phantom Wurm relevance 2.16 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- Rootbreaker Wurm relevance 2.13 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Metamorphic Wurm relevance 2.09 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
1
All enchantments (1)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 2.42 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
EDH data for Jungle Wurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 39 real decks.
























