Color Identity Spread
157 decks
- Green 94 · 59.9%
- Naya 23 · 14.6%
- Sultai 9 · 5.7%
- Golgari 6 · 3.8%
- Jund 5 · 3.2%
- Five-Color 5 · 3.2%
- Other (7) 15 · 9.6%
3
All commanders (3)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 3.33 · 3.3% (73 of 2,200 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.85 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Myojin of Life's Web relevance 0.60 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
6
All parallel cards (6)
30
All most relevant (30)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 3.92 · 66.9% (105 of 157 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 3.87 · 50.3% (79 of 157 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 3.79 · 47.8% (75 of 157 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 3.74 · 55.4% (87 of 157 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 3.66 · 52.2% (82 of 157 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 3.61 · 49.0% (77 of 157 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 3.59 · 58.0% (91 of 157 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 3.52 · 68.8% (108 of 157 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 3.43 · 42.7% (67 of 157 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 3.42 · 44.6% (70 of 157 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 3.39 · 46.5% (73 of 157 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 3.32 · 45.9% (72 of 157 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 3.16 · 42.0% (66 of 157 decks)
- Pathbreaker Wurm relevance 3.05 · 33.8% (53 of 157 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 3.01 · 57.3% (90 of 157 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 2.84 · 44.6% (70 of 157 decks)
- Symbiotic Wurm relevance 2.83 · 35.7% (56 of 157 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 2.78 · 53.5% (84 of 157 decks)
- Crush of Wurms relevance 2.68 · 34.4% (54 of 157 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 2.68 · 36.3% (57 of 157 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 2.63 · 37.6% (59 of 157 decks)
- Witherscale Wurm relevance 2.62 · 29.9% (47 of 157 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 2.42 · 37.6% (59 of 157 decks)
- Carnage Wurm relevance 2.42 · 28.0% (44 of 157 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 2.41 · 32.5% (51 of 157 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 2.31 · 47.8% (75 of 157 decks)
- Battering Wurm relevance 2.27 · 22.9% (36 of 157 decks)
- Siege Wurm relevance 2.23 · 26.1% (41 of 157 decks)
- Elfhame Wurm relevance 2.19 · 26.1% (41 of 157 decks)
- Vigorspore Wurm relevance 2.18 · 24.2% (38 of 157 decks)
44
All creatures (44)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 3.92 · 66.9% (105 of 157 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 3.87 · 50.3% (79 of 157 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 3.79 · 47.8% (75 of 157 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 3.74 · 55.4% (87 of 157 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 3.66 · 52.2% (82 of 157 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 3.61 · 49.0% (77 of 157 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 3.59 · 58.0% (91 of 157 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 3.52 · 68.8% (108 of 157 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 3.43 · 42.7% (67 of 157 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 3.42 · 44.6% (70 of 157 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 3.39 · 46.5% (73 of 157 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 3.32 · 45.9% (72 of 157 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 3.16 · 42.0% (66 of 157 decks)
- Pathbreaker Wurm relevance 3.05 · 33.8% (53 of 157 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 2.84 · 44.6% (70 of 157 decks)
- Symbiotic Wurm relevance 2.83 · 35.7% (56 of 157 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 2.78 · 53.5% (84 of 157 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 2.68 · 36.3% (57 of 157 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 2.63 · 37.6% (59 of 157 decks)
- Witherscale Wurm relevance 2.62 · 29.9% (47 of 157 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 2.42 · 37.6% (59 of 157 decks)
- Carnage Wurm relevance 2.42 · 28.0% (44 of 157 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 2.41 · 32.5% (51 of 157 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 2.31 · 47.8% (75 of 157 decks)
- Battering Wurm relevance 2.27 · 22.9% (36 of 157 decks)
- Siege Wurm relevance 2.23 · 26.1% (41 of 157 decks)
- Elfhame Wurm relevance 2.19 · 26.1% (41 of 157 decks)
- Vigorspore Wurm relevance 2.18 · 24.2% (38 of 157 decks)
- Hazard of the Dunes relevance 2.04 · 24.8% (39 of 157 decks)
- Gravetiller Wurm relevance 2.01 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 2.00 · 31.8% (50 of 157 decks)
- Deathcoil Wurm relevance 1.99 · 22.3% (35 of 157 decks)
- Ravenous Lindwurm relevance 1.97 · 22.3% (35 of 157 decks)
- Roaring Slagwurm relevance 1.96 · 21.0% (33 of 157 decks)
- Soul Swallower relevance 1.94 · 23.6% (37 of 157 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 1.87 · 42.7% (67 of 157 decks)
- Havenwood Wurm relevance 1.79 · 17.8% (28 of 157 decks)
- Argothian Wurm relevance 1.76 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
- Metamorphic Wurm relevance 1.75 · 17.2% (27 of 157 decks)
- Boneyard Wurm relevance 1.69 · 22.3% (35 of 157 decks)
- Pouncing Wurm relevance 1.68 · 17.8% (28 of 157 decks)
- Voracious Wurm relevance 1.65 · 18.5% (29 of 157 decks)
- Phantom Wurm relevance 1.55 · 16.6% (26 of 157 decks)
- Iron-Craw Crusher relevance 1.50 · 17.8% (28 of 157 decks)
2
All enchantments (2)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 3.01 · 57.3% (90 of 157 decks)
- Wurmweaver Coil relevance 1.75 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
3
All sorceries (3)
- Crush of Wurms relevance 2.68 · 34.4% (54 of 157 decks)
- Roar of the Wurm relevance 1.95 · 22.9% (36 of 157 decks)
- Wurmcalling relevance 1.68 · 22.9% (36 of 157 decks)
1
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 1.53 · 29.9% (47 of 157 decks)
EDH data for Tunneler Wurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 157 real decks.


























