Evasive Action
Played in 78 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
4.5% Azorius
- Simic 704 · 40.8%
- Five-Color 487 · 28.2%
- Blue 83 · 4.8%
- Azorius 78 · 4.5%
- Izzet 57 · 3.3%
- Witch-Maw 51 · 3.0%
- Other (11) 265 · 15.4%
Commanders
1
Commanders
1All commanders (1)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Siani, Eye of the Storm relevance 0.68 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Bring the Ending relevance 3.29 · 51.3% (40 of 78 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 3.17 · 46.2% (36 of 78 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 3.12 · 55.1% (43 of 78 decks)
- Complicate relevance 3.11 · 47.4% (37 of 78 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 3.10 · 44.9% (35 of 78 decks)
- Disruptive Student relevance 3.08 · 46.2% (36 of 78 decks)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 3.05 · 44.9% (35 of 78 decks)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 3.00 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 2.93 · 46.2% (36 of 78 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 2.93 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- Contradict relevance 2.90 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- Censor relevance 2.89 · 47.4% (37 of 78 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 2.88 · 42.3% (33 of 78 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 2.85 · 47.4% (37 of 78 decks)
- Countermand relevance 2.83 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 2.80 · 48.7% (38 of 78 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 2.79 · 47.4% (37 of 78 decks)
- Abstruse Interference relevance 2.78 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 2.76 · 41.0% (32 of 78 decks)
- Declaration of Naught relevance 2.75 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 2.74 · 39.7% (31 of 78 decks)
- Don't Make a Sound relevance 2.73 · 51.3% (40 of 78 decks)
- Ertai's Meddling relevance 2.73 · 39.7% (31 of 78 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 2.71 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- Deprive relevance 2.71 · 46.2% (36 of 78 decks)
- Divert Disaster relevance 2.69 · 53.8% (42 of 78 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 2.65 · 41.0% (32 of 78 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 2.63 · 41.0% (32 of 78 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 2.63 · 42.3% (33 of 78 decks)
- Convolute relevance 2.62 · 46.2% (36 of 78 decks)
Creatures
2
Creatures
2 All creatures (2)
- Disruptive Student relevance 3.08 · 46.2% (36 of 78 decks)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 3.05 · 44.9% (35 of 78 decks)
Enchantments
1
Enchantments
1 All enchantments (1)
- Declaration of Naught relevance 2.75 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
Instants
47
Instants
47 All instants (47)
- Bring the Ending relevance 3.29 · 51.3% (40 of 78 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 3.17 · 46.2% (36 of 78 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 3.12 · 55.1% (43 of 78 decks)
- Complicate relevance 3.11 · 47.4% (37 of 78 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 3.10 · 44.9% (35 of 78 decks)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 3.00 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 2.93 · 46.2% (36 of 78 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 2.93 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- Contradict relevance 2.90 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- Censor relevance 2.89 · 47.4% (37 of 78 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 2.88 · 42.3% (33 of 78 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 2.85 · 47.4% (37 of 78 decks)
- Countermand relevance 2.83 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 2.80 · 48.7% (38 of 78 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 2.79 · 47.4% (37 of 78 decks)
- Abstruse Interference relevance 2.78 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 2.76 · 41.0% (32 of 78 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 2.74 · 39.7% (31 of 78 decks)
- Don't Make a Sound relevance 2.73 · 51.3% (40 of 78 decks)
- Ertai's Meddling relevance 2.73 · 39.7% (31 of 78 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 2.71 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- Deprive relevance 2.71 · 46.2% (36 of 78 decks)
- Divert Disaster relevance 2.69 · 53.8% (42 of 78 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 2.65 · 41.0% (32 of 78 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 2.63 · 41.0% (32 of 78 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 2.63 · 42.3% (33 of 78 decks)
- Convolute relevance 2.62 · 46.2% (36 of 78 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 2.61 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- Intervene relevance 2.60 · 38.5% (30 of 78 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 2.60 · 42.3% (33 of 78 decks)
- Confound relevance 2.59 · 52.6% (41 of 78 decks)
- Fall of the Gavel relevance 2.58 · 41.0% (32 of 78 decks)
- Desertion relevance 2.58 · 44.9% (35 of 78 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 2.56 · 44.9% (35 of 78 decks)
- Abjure relevance 2.55 · 48.7% (38 of 78 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 2.54 · 42.3% (33 of 78 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 2.53 · 37.2% (29 of 78 decks)
- Hydroblast relevance 2.52 · 38.5% (30 of 78 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 2.49 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- Condescend relevance 2.48 · 51.3% (40 of 78 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 2.47 · 43.6% (34 of 78 decks)
- It'll Quench Ya! relevance 2.46 · 51.3% (40 of 78 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 2.45 · 44.9% (35 of 78 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 2.43 · 42.3% (33 of 78 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 2.39 · 42.3% (33 of 78 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 2.37 · 44.9% (35 of 78 decks)
- Exclude relevance 2.37 · 42.3% (33 of 78 decks)
EDH data for Evasive Action: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 78 real decks.




















































