Crush Dissent
Played in 99 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
6.0% Azorius
230+2+1+47+
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 2.40 · 1.1% (67 of 6,137 decks)
- Temmet, Vizier of Naktamun relevance 0.84 · 1.4% (3 of 219 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Contradict relevance 3.69 · 55.6% (55 of 99 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 3.58 · 52.5% (52 of 99 decks)
- Complicate relevance 3.44 · 52.5% (52 of 99 decks)
- Convolute relevance 3.39 · 59.6% (59 of 99 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 3.35 · 48.5% (48 of 99 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 3.28 · 53.5% (53 of 99 decks)
- Countermand relevance 3.28 · 50.5% (50 of 99 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 3.21 · 50.5% (50 of 99 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 3.16 · 52.5% (52 of 99 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 2.99 · 43.4% (43 of 99 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 2.97 · 47.5% (47 of 99 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 2.92 · 45.5% (45 of 99 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 2.92 · 48.5% (48 of 99 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 2.89 · 46.5% (46 of 99 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 2.89 · 50.5% (50 of 99 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 2.86 · 47.5% (47 of 99 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 2.86 · 50.5% (50 of 99 decks)
- Desertion relevance 2.85 · 49.5% (49 of 99 decks)
- Censor relevance 2.83 · 46.5% (46 of 99 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 2.81 · 51.5% (51 of 99 decks)
- Abjure relevance 2.76 · 52.5% (52 of 99 decks)
- Deprive relevance 2.73 · 46.5% (46 of 99 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 2.72 · 40.4% (40 of 99 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 2.68 · 47.5% (47 of 99 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 2.68 · 46.5% (46 of 99 decks)
- Abstruse Interference relevance 2.65 · 41.4% (41 of 99 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 2.64 · 38.4% (38 of 99 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 2.62 · 40.4% (40 of 99 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 2.62 · 38.4% (38 of 99 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 2.61 · 43.4% (43 of 99 decks)
All creatures (2)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 2.34 · 34.3% (34 of 99 decks)
- Disruptive Student relevance 2.23 · 33.3% (33 of 99 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Declaration of Naught relevance 2.35 · 37.4% (37 of 99 decks)
All instants (47)
- Contradict relevance 3.69 · 55.6% (55 of 99 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 3.58 · 52.5% (52 of 99 decks)
- Complicate relevance 3.44 · 52.5% (52 of 99 decks)
- Convolute relevance 3.39 · 59.6% (59 of 99 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 3.35 · 48.5% (48 of 99 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 3.28 · 53.5% (53 of 99 decks)
- Countermand relevance 3.28 · 50.5% (50 of 99 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 3.21 · 50.5% (50 of 99 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 3.16 · 52.5% (52 of 99 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 2.99 · 43.4% (43 of 99 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 2.97 · 47.5% (47 of 99 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 2.92 · 45.5% (45 of 99 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 2.92 · 48.5% (48 of 99 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 2.89 · 46.5% (46 of 99 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 2.89 · 50.5% (50 of 99 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 2.86 · 47.5% (47 of 99 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 2.86 · 50.5% (50 of 99 decks)
- Desertion relevance 2.85 · 49.5% (49 of 99 decks)
- Censor relevance 2.83 · 46.5% (46 of 99 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 2.81 · 51.5% (51 of 99 decks)
- Abjure relevance 2.76 · 52.5% (52 of 99 decks)
- Deprive relevance 2.73 · 46.5% (46 of 99 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 2.72 · 40.4% (40 of 99 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 2.68 · 47.5% (47 of 99 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 2.68 · 46.5% (46 of 99 decks)
- Abstruse Interference relevance 2.65 · 41.4% (41 of 99 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 2.64 · 38.4% (38 of 99 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 2.62 · 40.4% (40 of 99 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 2.62 · 38.4% (38 of 99 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 2.61 · 43.4% (43 of 99 decks)
- Cancel relevance 2.56 · 64.6% (64 of 99 decks)
- Deny Entry relevance 2.50 · 39.4% (39 of 99 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 2.45 · 45.5% (45 of 99 decks)
- Didn't Say Please relevance 2.44 · 51.5% (51 of 99 decks)
- Condescend relevance 2.43 · 50.5% (50 of 99 decks)
- Blue Elemental Blast relevance 2.42 · 40.4% (40 of 99 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 2.41 · 42.4% (42 of 99 decks)
- Confound relevance 2.39 · 48.5% (48 of 99 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 2.37 · 47.5% (47 of 99 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 2.34 · 36.4% (36 of 99 decks)
- Commence the Endgame relevance 2.31 · 35.4% (35 of 99 decks)
- Fall of the Gavel relevance 2.29 · 36.4% (36 of 99 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 2.28 · 40.4% (40 of 99 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 2.25 · 39.4% (39 of 99 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 2.24 · 57.6% (57 of 99 decks)
- Divert Disaster relevance 2.22 · 44.4% (44 of 99 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 2.21 · 38.4% (38 of 99 decks)
EDH data for Crush Dissent: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 99 real decks.

























