Silkweaver Elite
Played in 96 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
20.7% Green
All commanders (15)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 2.36 · 6.4% (12 of 187 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 1.14 · 2.0% (4 of 198 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.97 · 1.2% (4 of 345 decks)
- Syr Faren, the Hengehammer relevance 0.90 · 3.7% (2 of 54 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.78 · 2.1% (2 of 95 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.74 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Master Chef relevance 0.65 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 0.64 · 1.0% (2 of 197 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.60 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.60 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 0.58 · 4.0% (1 of 25 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.57 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Mister Immortal relevance 0.48 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 0.48 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
- Kolvori, God of Kinship // The Ringhart Crest relevance 0.46 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Tajuru Pathwarden relevance 2.01 · 32.3% (31 of 96 decks)
- Joraga Visionary relevance 1.98 · 31.3% (30 of 96 decks)
- Entourage of Trest relevance 1.60 · 26.0% (25 of 96 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.58 · 50.0% (48 of 96 decks)
- Kujar Seedsculptor relevance 1.51 · 22.9% (22 of 96 decks)
- Lifespring Druid relevance 1.44 · 22.9% (22 of 96 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.40 · 33.3% (32 of 96 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.32 · 41.7% (40 of 96 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 1.30 · 33.3% (32 of 96 decks)
- Gladehart Cavalry relevance 1.30 · 20.8% (20 of 96 decks)
- Plummet relevance 1.29 · 25.0% (24 of 96 decks)
- Ezuri's Archers relevance 1.22 · 19.8% (19 of 96 decks)
- Elderleaf Mentor relevance 1.21 · 18.8% (18 of 96 decks)
- Spire Tracer relevance 1.14 · 17.7% (17 of 96 decks)
- Beast-Kin Ranger relevance 1.13 · 18.8% (18 of 96 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 1.11 · 33.3% (32 of 96 decks)
- Lys Alana Bowmaster relevance 1.08 · 17.7% (17 of 96 decks)
- Wild Wanderer relevance 1.05 · 16.7% (16 of 96 decks)
- Elvish Eulogist relevance 0.99 · 14.6% (14 of 96 decks)
- Shaman of Spring relevance 0.97 · 14.6% (14 of 96 decks)
- Llanowar Empath relevance 0.95 · 14.6% (14 of 96 decks)
- Gladecover Scout relevance 0.95 · 14.6% (14 of 96 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.95 · 26.0% (25 of 96 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.94 · 19.8% (19 of 96 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.94 · 22.9% (22 of 96 decks)
- Dawn's Light Archer relevance 0.92 · 16.7% (16 of 96 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.92 · 18.8% (18 of 96 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.90 · 35.4% (34 of 96 decks)
- Elven Bow relevance 0.88 · 13.5% (13 of 96 decks)
- Sylvan Messenger relevance 0.87 · 17.7% (17 of 96 decks)
All creatures (36)
- Tajuru Pathwarden relevance 2.01 · 32.3% (31 of 96 decks)
- Joraga Visionary relevance 1.98 · 31.3% (30 of 96 decks)
- Entourage of Trest relevance 1.60 · 26.0% (25 of 96 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.58 · 50.0% (48 of 96 decks)
- Kujar Seedsculptor relevance 1.51 · 22.9% (22 of 96 decks)
- Lifespring Druid relevance 1.44 · 22.9% (22 of 96 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.40 · 33.3% (32 of 96 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.32 · 41.7% (40 of 96 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 1.30 · 33.3% (32 of 96 decks)
- Gladehart Cavalry relevance 1.30 · 20.8% (20 of 96 decks)
- Ezuri's Archers relevance 1.22 · 19.8% (19 of 96 decks)
- Elderleaf Mentor relevance 1.21 · 18.8% (18 of 96 decks)
- Spire Tracer relevance 1.14 · 17.7% (17 of 96 decks)
- Beast-Kin Ranger relevance 1.13 · 18.8% (18 of 96 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 1.11 · 33.3% (32 of 96 decks)
- Lys Alana Bowmaster relevance 1.08 · 17.7% (17 of 96 decks)
- Wild Wanderer relevance 1.05 · 16.7% (16 of 96 decks)
- Elvish Eulogist relevance 0.99 · 14.6% (14 of 96 decks)
- Shaman of Spring relevance 0.97 · 14.6% (14 of 96 decks)
- Llanowar Empath relevance 0.95 · 14.6% (14 of 96 decks)
- Gladecover Scout relevance 0.95 · 14.6% (14 of 96 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.95 · 26.0% (25 of 96 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.94 · 19.8% (19 of 96 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.94 · 22.9% (22 of 96 decks)
- Dawn's Light Archer relevance 0.92 · 16.7% (16 of 96 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.92 · 18.8% (18 of 96 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.90 · 35.4% (34 of 96 decks)
- Sylvan Messenger relevance 0.87 · 17.7% (17 of 96 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.87 · 22.9% (22 of 96 decks)
- Wildheart Invoker relevance 0.85 · 14.6% (14 of 96 decks)
- Deepwood Denizen relevance 0.81 · 18.8% (18 of 96 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.79 · 20.8% (20 of 96 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 0.77 · 16.7% (16 of 96 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.76 · 33.3% (32 of 96 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.76 · 20.8% (20 of 96 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.72 · 28.1% (27 of 96 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Elven Bow relevance 0.88 · 13.5% (13 of 96 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- New Horizons relevance 0.87 · 17.7% (17 of 96 decks)
- Favor of Jukai relevance 0.71 · 10.4% (10 of 96 decks)
All instants (6)
- Plummet relevance 1.29 · 25.0% (24 of 96 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.87 · 27.1% (26 of 96 decks)
- Spidery Grasp relevance 0.85 · 12.5% (12 of 96 decks)
- Efflorescence relevance 0.74 · 12.5% (12 of 96 decks)
- Crushing Canopy relevance 0.70 · 12.5% (12 of 96 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.70 · 22.9% (22 of 96 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Adventure Awaits relevance 0.86 · 15.6% (15 of 96 decks)
- Hunting Triad relevance 0.83 · 14.6% (14 of 96 decks)
- Bond of Flourishing relevance 0.77 · 12.5% (12 of 96 decks)
- Reclaiming Vines relevance 0.76 · 11.5% (11 of 96 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.72 · 17.7% (17 of 96 decks)
EDH data for Silkweaver Elite: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 96 real decks.