Craven Hulk
Played in 34 Izzet decks
130+23+2+4+12+5+1+3+
Color Identity Spread
29.6% Izzet
Commanders
Most Relevant
Cinderheart Giant 88.2% of decks
Cinderheart Giant 88.2% of decks
Basalt Ravager 73.5% of decks
Basalt Ravager 73.5% of decks
Squash 73.5% of decks
Squash 73.5% of decks
Invasion of the Giants 67.6% of decks
Invasion of the Giants 67.6% of decks
Glimpse the Cosmos 61.8% of decks
Glimpse the Cosmos 61.8% of decks
Battle of Frost and Fire 58.8% of decks
Battle of Frost and Fire 58.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Aegar, the Freezing Flame relevance 3.22 · 1.8% (31 of 1,698 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cinderheart Giant relevance 5.72 · 88.2% (30 of 34 decks)
- Basalt Ravager relevance 4.03 · 73.5% (25 of 34 decks)
- Squash relevance 3.93 · 73.5% (25 of 34 decks)
- Invasion of the Giants relevance 3.83 · 67.6% (23 of 34 decks)
- Glimpse the Cosmos relevance 3.25 · 61.8% (21 of 34 decks)
- Battle of Frost and Fire relevance 3.23 · 58.8% (20 of 34 decks)
- Calamity Bearer relevance 3.21 · 61.8% (21 of 34 decks)
- Giant's Amulet relevance 3.20 · 55.9% (19 of 34 decks)
- Crush the Weak relevance 3.15 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 3.10 · 64.7% (22 of 34 decks)
- Quakebringer relevance 3.10 · 58.8% (20 of 34 decks)
- Demon Bolt relevance 2.85 · 50.0% (17 of 34 decks)
- Surtland Flinger relevance 2.85 · 50.0% (17 of 34 decks)
- Fire Giant's Fury relevance 2.62 · 44.1% (15 of 34 decks)
- Surtland Elementalist relevance 2.61 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Giant's Grasp relevance 2.37 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Dual Strike relevance 2.22 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Run Amok relevance 2.07 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Open the Omenpaths relevance 2.03 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Iron-Fist Pulverizer relevance 2.03 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Boldwyr Aggressor relevance 2.01 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Tectonic Giant relevance 1.97 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 1.97 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Smashing Success relevance 1.96 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Stinkdrinker Daredevil relevance 1.95 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Depart the Realm relevance 1.94 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Shatterskull Charger relevance 1.82 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Saw It Coming relevance 1.77 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 1.76 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Karfell Harbinger relevance 1.71 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Cinderheart Giant relevance 5.72 · 88.2% (30 of 34 decks)
- Basalt Ravager relevance 4.03 · 73.5% (25 of 34 decks)
- Calamity Bearer relevance 3.21 · 61.8% (21 of 34 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 3.10 · 64.7% (22 of 34 decks)
- Quakebringer relevance 3.10 · 58.8% (20 of 34 decks)
- Surtland Flinger relevance 2.85 · 50.0% (17 of 34 decks)
- Surtland Elementalist relevance 2.61 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Iron-Fist Pulverizer relevance 2.03 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Boldwyr Aggressor relevance 2.01 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Tectonic Giant relevance 1.97 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Stinkdrinker Daredevil relevance 1.95 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Shatterskull Charger relevance 1.82 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Karfell Harbinger relevance 1.71 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Sunrise Sovereign relevance 1.62 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 1.57 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Giant Harbinger relevance 1.57 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Borderland Behemoth relevance 1.48 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Bonecrusher Giant // Stomp relevance 1.48 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Thundercloud Shaman relevance 1.47 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Warchief Giant relevance 1.38 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Hamletback Goliath relevance 1.36 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Zealous Lorecaster relevance 1.35 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 1.26 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Giant's Amulet relevance 3.20 · 55.9% (19 of 34 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 1.76 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Invasion of the Giants relevance 3.83 · 67.6% (23 of 34 decks)
- Battle of Frost and Fire relevance 3.23 · 58.8% (20 of 34 decks)
- Giant's Grasp relevance 2.37 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 1.97 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
All instants (12)
- Squash relevance 3.93 · 73.5% (25 of 34 decks)
- Demon Bolt relevance 2.85 · 50.0% (17 of 34 decks)
- Dual Strike relevance 2.22 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Run Amok relevance 2.07 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Open the Omenpaths relevance 2.03 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Smashing Success relevance 1.96 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Depart the Realm relevance 1.94 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Saw It Coming relevance 1.77 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Annul relevance 1.55 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 1.54 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 1.44 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Crush Underfoot relevance 1.32 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Glimpse the Cosmos relevance 3.25 · 61.8% (21 of 34 decks)
- Crush the Weak relevance 3.15 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Fire Giant's Fury relevance 2.62 · 44.1% (15 of 34 decks)
- Giant's Ire relevance 1.60 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 1.39 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Surtland Frostpyre relevance 2.13 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
All lands (3)
- Volatile Fjord relevance 1.72 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 1.56 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 1.53 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
EDH data for Craven Hulk: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 34 real decks.











































