Battle of Frost and Fire
Played in 1,967 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
2K decks
- Izzet 1,011 · 51.4%
- Five-Color 494 · 25.1%
- Jeskai 300 · 15.3%
- Temur 87 · 4.4%
- Ink-Treader 42 · 2.1%
- Other (7) 33 · 1.7%
Commanders
26
Commanders
26All commanders (26)
- Aegar, the Freezing Flame relevance 6.20 · 53.3% (853 of 1,601 decks)
- Ruhan of the Fomori relevance 5.01 · 17.9% (248 of 1,387 decks)
- Tom Bombadil relevance 3.29 · 2.5% (269 of 10,752 decks)
- Beluna Grandsquall // Seek Thrills relevance 1.78 · 1.2% (18 of 1,500 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 1.22 · 5.3% (4 of 76 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 1.00 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.89 · 1.2% (5 of 406 decks)
- Ian Chesterton // The Ninth Doctor relevance 0.76 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.72 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.72 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.70 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.67 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Keranos, God of Storms relevance 0.67 · 1.7% (8 of 478 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.63 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.63 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Donna Noble // The Seventh Doctor relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Jo Grant // The Twelfth Doctor relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Barbara Wright // The Twelfth Doctor relevance 0.58 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 0.57 · 2.2% (2 of 92 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.51 · 2.5% (1 of 40 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.48 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.48 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Alexander Clamilton relevance 0.45 · 1.4% (4 of 280 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.42 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.31 · 1.4% (1 of 70 decks)
- Clan Crafter // Ganax, Astral Hunter relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (1 of 36 decks)
Parallel Cards
2
Parallel Cards
All parallel cards (2)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Invasion of the Giants relevance 4.50 · 53.7% (1,057 of 1,967 decks)
- Calamity Bearer relevance 4.36 · 64.6% (1,271 of 1,967 decks)
- Sunrise Sovereign relevance 4.14 · 56.3% (1,107 of 1,967 decks)
- Thundercloud Shaman relevance 4.11 · 54.2% (1,066 of 1,967 decks)
- Squash relevance 4.06 · 52.1% (1,024 of 1,967 decks)
- Glimpse the Cosmos relevance 4.05 · 52.3% (1,028 of 1,967 decks)
- Stinkdrinker Daredevil relevance 4.03 · 54.7% (1,075 of 1,967 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 3.97 · 62.2% (1,223 of 1,967 decks)
- Quakebringer relevance 3.84 · 57.5% (1,132 of 1,967 decks)
- Borderland Behemoth relevance 3.75 · 50.8% (999 of 1,967 decks)
- Crush Underfoot relevance 3.52 · 45.6% (897 of 1,967 decks)
- Surtland Flinger relevance 3.33 · 44.6% (877 of 1,967 decks)
- Boldwyr Aggressor relevance 3.28 · 45.2% (889 of 1,967 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 3.25 · 59.3% (1,166 of 1,967 decks)
- Surtland Elementalist relevance 3.20 · 39.5% (777 of 1,967 decks)
- Fire Giant's Fury relevance 2.99 · 37.1% (729 of 1,967 decks)
- Giant Harbinger relevance 2.97 · 38.4% (756 of 1,967 decks)
- Basalt Ravager relevance 2.90 · 41.3% (812 of 1,967 decks)
- Bonecrusher Giant // Stomp relevance 2.90 · 47.2% (928 of 1,967 decks)
- Frost Titan relevance 2.72 · 39.1% (770 of 1,967 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 2.61 · 48.4% (952 of 1,967 decks)
- Tectonic Giant relevance 2.59 · 48.0% (945 of 1,967 decks)
- Giant's Grasp relevance 2.57 · 30.0% (590 of 1,967 decks)
- Prophetic Titan relevance 2.53 · 29.8% (587 of 1,967 decks)
- Hamletback Goliath relevance 2.53 · 37.8% (744 of 1,967 decks)
- Galvanic Giant // Storm Reading relevance 2.14 · 29.0% (571 of 1,967 decks)
- Warchief Giant relevance 1.85 · 26.7% (526 of 1,967 decks)
- Goliath Daydreamer relevance 1.85 · 30.8% (605 of 1,967 decks)
- Aegar, the Freezing Flame relevance 1.69 · 22.2% (436 of 1,967 decks)
- Fall of the Hammer relevance 1.67 · 23.8% (468 of 1,967 decks)
Creatures
29
Creatures
29 All creatures (29)
- Calamity Bearer relevance 4.36 · 64.6% (1,271 of 1,967 decks)
- Sunrise Sovereign relevance 4.14 · 56.3% (1,107 of 1,967 decks)
- Thundercloud Shaman relevance 4.11 · 54.2% (1,066 of 1,967 decks)
- Stinkdrinker Daredevil relevance 4.03 · 54.7% (1,075 of 1,967 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 3.97 · 62.2% (1,223 of 1,967 decks)
- Quakebringer relevance 3.84 · 57.5% (1,132 of 1,967 decks)
- Borderland Behemoth relevance 3.75 · 50.8% (999 of 1,967 decks)
- Surtland Flinger relevance 3.33 · 44.6% (877 of 1,967 decks)
- Boldwyr Aggressor relevance 3.28 · 45.2% (889 of 1,967 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 3.25 · 59.3% (1,166 of 1,967 decks)
- Surtland Elementalist relevance 3.20 · 39.5% (777 of 1,967 decks)
- Giant Harbinger relevance 2.97 · 38.4% (756 of 1,967 decks)
- Basalt Ravager relevance 2.90 · 41.3% (812 of 1,967 decks)
- Bonecrusher Giant // Stomp relevance 2.90 · 47.2% (928 of 1,967 decks)
- Frost Titan relevance 2.72 · 39.1% (770 of 1,967 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 2.61 · 48.4% (952 of 1,967 decks)
- Tectonic Giant relevance 2.59 · 48.0% (945 of 1,967 decks)
- Prophetic Titan relevance 2.53 · 29.8% (587 of 1,967 decks)
- Hamletback Goliath relevance 2.53 · 37.8% (744 of 1,967 decks)
- Galvanic Giant // Storm Reading relevance 2.14 · 29.0% (571 of 1,967 decks)
- Warchief Giant relevance 1.85 · 26.7% (526 of 1,967 decks)
- Goliath Daydreamer relevance 1.85 · 30.8% (605 of 1,967 decks)
- Aegar, the Freezing Flame relevance 1.69 · 22.2% (436 of 1,967 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 1.49 · 35.4% (697 of 1,967 decks)
- Crystalline Giant relevance 1.48 · 23.8% (468 of 1,967 decks)
- Realm-Cloaked Giant // Cast Off relevance 1.17 · 19.0% (373 of 1,967 decks)
- Toralf, God of Fury // Toralf's Hammer relevance 1.09 · 18.5% (363 of 1,967 decks)
- Cinderheart Giant relevance 1.02 · 12.0% (237 of 1,967 decks)
- Shatterskull Charger relevance 1.00 · 12.0% (237 of 1,967 decks)
Artifacts
2
Artifacts
2 All artifacts (2)
- Giant's Amulet relevance 1.63 · 21.7% (427 of 1,967 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 1.26 · 41.2% (811 of 1,967 decks)
Enchantments
4
Enchantments
4 All enchantments (4)
- Invasion of the Giants relevance 4.50 · 53.7% (1,057 of 1,967 decks)
- Giant's Grasp relevance 2.57 · 30.0% (590 of 1,967 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 1.28 · 31.7% (624 of 1,967 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 1.13 · 27.5% (541 of 1,967 decks)
Instants
7
Instants
7 All instants (7)
- Squash relevance 4.06 · 52.1% (1,024 of 1,967 decks)
- Crush Underfoot relevance 3.52 · 45.6% (897 of 1,967 decks)
- Fall of the Hammer relevance 1.67 · 23.8% (468 of 1,967 decks)
- Giantfall relevance 1.46 · 22.6% (445 of 1,967 decks)
- Flame of Anor relevance 1.15 · 24.4% (479 of 1,967 decks)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 1.13 · 19.6% (386 of 1,967 decks)
- Wizard's Lightning relevance 1.07 · 16.6% (326 of 1,967 decks)
Sorceries
4
Sorceries
4 All sorceries (4)
- Glimpse the Cosmos relevance 4.05 · 52.3% (1,028 of 1,967 decks)
- Fire Giant's Fury relevance 2.99 · 37.1% (729 of 1,967 decks)
- Mizzium Mortars relevance 1.49 · 27.5% (541 of 1,967 decks)
- Giant's Ire relevance 1.39 · 15.7% (309 of 1,967 decks)
Utility Lands
2
Utility Lands
2 All utility lands (2)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 2.05 · 33.8% (664 of 1,967 decks)
- Temple of Epiphany relevance 1.09 · 31.7% (624 of 1,967 decks)
Lands
2
Lands
2 All lands (2)
- Sulfur Falls relevance 1.09 · 44.3% (872 of 1,967 decks)
- Ancient Amphitheater relevance 1.03 · 14.6% (287 of 1,967 decks)
EDH data for Battle of Frost and Fire: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,967 real decks.














































































