Battle of Frost and Fire
Played in 1,965 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
2K decks
- Izzet 1,010 · 51.4%
- Five-Color 494 · 25.1%
- Jeskai 300 · 15.3%
- Temur 87 · 4.4%
- Ink-Treader 42 · 2.1%
- Other (7) 32 · 1.6%
Commanders
26
Commanders
26All commanders (26)
- Aegar, the Freezing Flame relevance 6.20 · 53.3% (852 of 1,599 decks)
- Ruhan of the Fomori relevance 5.01 · 17.9% (248 of 1,383 decks)
- Tom Bombadil relevance 3.29 · 2.5% (269 of 10,719 decks)
- Beluna Grandsquall // Seek Thrills relevance 1.78 · 1.2% (18 of 1,499 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 1.22 · 5.3% (4 of 76 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 1.00 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.89 · 1.2% (5 of 406 decks)
- Ian Chesterton // The Ninth Doctor relevance 0.76 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.72 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.72 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.71 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Keranos, God of Storms relevance 0.68 · 1.7% (8 of 473 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.67 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.63 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.63 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Donna Noble // The Seventh Doctor relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Jo Grant // The Twelfth Doctor relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Barbara Wright // The Twelfth Doctor relevance 0.58 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 0.57 · 2.2% (2 of 92 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.51 · 2.5% (1 of 40 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.48 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.48 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Alexander Clamilton relevance 0.46 · 1.4% (4 of 278 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.42 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.31 · 1.5% (1 of 68 decks)
- Clan Crafter // Ganax, Astral Hunter relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (1 of 36 decks)
Parallel Cards
2
Parallel Cards
All parallel cards (2)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Invasion of the Giants relevance 4.49 · 53.7% (1,055 of 1,965 decks)
- Calamity Bearer relevance 4.36 · 64.6% (1,269 of 1,965 decks)
- Sunrise Sovereign relevance 4.13 · 56.2% (1,105 of 1,965 decks)
- Thundercloud Shaman relevance 4.11 · 54.2% (1,065 of 1,965 decks)
- Squash relevance 4.06 · 52.1% (1,023 of 1,965 decks)
- Glimpse the Cosmos relevance 4.05 · 52.3% (1,027 of 1,965 decks)
- Stinkdrinker Daredevil relevance 4.03 · 54.6% (1,073 of 1,965 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 3.96 · 62.1% (1,221 of 1,965 decks)
- Quakebringer relevance 3.83 · 57.5% (1,130 of 1,965 decks)
- Borderland Behemoth relevance 3.74 · 50.7% (997 of 1,965 decks)
- Crush Underfoot relevance 3.51 · 45.6% (896 of 1,965 decks)
- Surtland Flinger relevance 3.33 · 44.6% (877 of 1,965 decks)
- Boldwyr Aggressor relevance 3.27 · 45.1% (887 of 1,965 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 3.25 · 59.2% (1,164 of 1,965 decks)
- Surtland Elementalist relevance 3.19 · 39.5% (776 of 1,965 decks)
- Fire Giant's Fury relevance 2.99 · 37.1% (729 of 1,965 decks)
- Giant Harbinger relevance 2.96 · 38.4% (755 of 1,965 decks)
- Basalt Ravager relevance 2.90 · 41.3% (811 of 1,965 decks)
- Bonecrusher Giant // Stomp relevance 2.90 · 47.1% (926 of 1,965 decks)
- Frost Titan relevance 2.72 · 39.1% (769 of 1,965 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 2.60 · 48.4% (951 of 1,965 decks)
- Tectonic Giant relevance 2.59 · 48.0% (944 of 1,965 decks)
- Giant's Grasp relevance 2.57 · 30.0% (590 of 1,965 decks)
- Prophetic Titan relevance 2.53 · 29.9% (587 of 1,965 decks)
- Hamletback Goliath relevance 2.53 · 37.8% (743 of 1,965 decks)
- Galvanic Giant // Storm Reading relevance 2.14 · 29.1% (571 of 1,965 decks)
- Warchief Giant relevance 1.85 · 26.7% (525 of 1,965 decks)
- Goliath Daydreamer relevance 1.85 · 30.7% (604 of 1,965 decks)
- Aegar, the Freezing Flame relevance 1.69 · 22.2% (436 of 1,965 decks)
- Fall of the Hammer relevance 1.68 · 23.8% (468 of 1,965 decks)
Creatures
29
Creatures
29 All creatures (29)
- Calamity Bearer relevance 4.36 · 64.6% (1,269 of 1,965 decks)
- Sunrise Sovereign relevance 4.13 · 56.2% (1,105 of 1,965 decks)
- Thundercloud Shaman relevance 4.11 · 54.2% (1,065 of 1,965 decks)
- Stinkdrinker Daredevil relevance 4.03 · 54.6% (1,073 of 1,965 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 3.96 · 62.1% (1,221 of 1,965 decks)
- Quakebringer relevance 3.83 · 57.5% (1,130 of 1,965 decks)
- Borderland Behemoth relevance 3.74 · 50.7% (997 of 1,965 decks)
- Surtland Flinger relevance 3.33 · 44.6% (877 of 1,965 decks)
- Boldwyr Aggressor relevance 3.27 · 45.1% (887 of 1,965 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 3.25 · 59.2% (1,164 of 1,965 decks)
- Surtland Elementalist relevance 3.19 · 39.5% (776 of 1,965 decks)
- Giant Harbinger relevance 2.96 · 38.4% (755 of 1,965 decks)
- Basalt Ravager relevance 2.90 · 41.3% (811 of 1,965 decks)
- Bonecrusher Giant // Stomp relevance 2.90 · 47.1% (926 of 1,965 decks)
- Frost Titan relevance 2.72 · 39.1% (769 of 1,965 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 2.60 · 48.4% (951 of 1,965 decks)
- Tectonic Giant relevance 2.59 · 48.0% (944 of 1,965 decks)
- Prophetic Titan relevance 2.53 · 29.9% (587 of 1,965 decks)
- Hamletback Goliath relevance 2.53 · 37.8% (743 of 1,965 decks)
- Galvanic Giant // Storm Reading relevance 2.14 · 29.1% (571 of 1,965 decks)
- Warchief Giant relevance 1.85 · 26.7% (525 of 1,965 decks)
- Goliath Daydreamer relevance 1.85 · 30.7% (604 of 1,965 decks)
- Aegar, the Freezing Flame relevance 1.69 · 22.2% (436 of 1,965 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 1.49 · 35.4% (695 of 1,965 decks)
- Crystalline Giant relevance 1.48 · 23.7% (466 of 1,965 decks)
- Realm-Cloaked Giant // Cast Off relevance 1.17 · 19.0% (373 of 1,965 decks)
- Toralf, God of Fury // Toralf's Hammer relevance 1.09 · 18.4% (361 of 1,965 decks)
- Cinderheart Giant relevance 1.02 · 12.1% (237 of 1,965 decks)
- Shatterskull Charger relevance 1.00 · 12.0% (236 of 1,965 decks)
Artifacts
2
Artifacts
2 All artifacts (2)
- Giant's Amulet relevance 1.63 · 21.7% (426 of 1,965 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 1.26 · 41.2% (809 of 1,965 decks)
Enchantments
4
Enchantments
4 All enchantments (4)
- Invasion of the Giants relevance 4.49 · 53.7% (1,055 of 1,965 decks)
- Giant's Grasp relevance 2.57 · 30.0% (590 of 1,965 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 1.28 · 31.7% (623 of 1,965 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 1.13 · 27.5% (540 of 1,965 decks)
Instants
7
Instants
7 All instants (7)
- Squash relevance 4.06 · 52.1% (1,023 of 1,965 decks)
- Crush Underfoot relevance 3.51 · 45.6% (896 of 1,965 decks)
- Fall of the Hammer relevance 1.68 · 23.8% (468 of 1,965 decks)
- Giantfall relevance 1.46 · 22.6% (444 of 1,965 decks)
- Flame of Anor relevance 1.15 · 24.3% (478 of 1,965 decks)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 1.13 · 19.6% (386 of 1,965 decks)
- Wizard's Lightning relevance 1.07 · 16.6% (326 of 1,965 decks)
Sorceries
4
Sorceries
4 All sorceries (4)
- Glimpse the Cosmos relevance 4.05 · 52.3% (1,027 of 1,965 decks)
- Fire Giant's Fury relevance 2.99 · 37.1% (729 of 1,965 decks)
- Mizzium Mortars relevance 1.50 · 27.5% (541 of 1,965 decks)
- Giant's Ire relevance 1.39 · 15.7% (309 of 1,965 decks)
Utility Lands
2
Utility Lands
2 All utility lands (2)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 2.05 · 33.8% (664 of 1,965 decks)
- Temple of Epiphany relevance 1.09 · 31.7% (623 of 1,965 decks)
Lands
2
Lands
2 All lands (2)
- Sulfur Falls relevance 1.09 · 44.3% (871 of 1,965 decks)
- Ancient Amphitheater relevance 1.03 · 14.6% (287 of 1,965 decks)
EDH data for Battle of Frost and Fire: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,965 real decks.














































































