630+24+1+7+14+4+
Color Identity Spread
8.2% Azorius
Commanders
Krile Baldesion 4.9% of decks
Krile Baldesion 4.9% of decks
Whtz, the Bibliophile 1.1% of decks
Whtz, the Bibliophile 1.1% of decks
Rex, Cyber-Hound 1.8% of decks
Rex, Cyber-Hound 1.8% of decks
Noble Heritage // Volo, Itinerant Scholar 2.5% of decks
Noble Heritage // Volo, Itinerant Scholar 2.5% of decks
Dragon Man, Reformed Robot 2.3% of decks
Dragon Man, Reformed Robot 2.3% of decks
Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker 1.2% of decks
Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker 1.2% of decks
Most Relevant
Chronic Flooding 28.7% of decks
Chronic Flooding 28.7% of decks
Alchemist's Apprentice 28.7% of decks
Alchemist's Apprentice 28.7% of decks
Bond of Insight 26.9% of decks
Bond of Insight 26.9% of decks
Cephalid Inkmage 26.3% of decks
Cephalid Inkmage 26.3% of decks
Cephalid Broker 24.0% of decks
Cephalid Broker 24.0% of decks
Chain to Memory 23.4% of decks
Chain to Memory 23.4% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (6)
- Krile Baldesion relevance 2.30 · 4.9% (20 of 406 decks)
- Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 2.03 · 1.1% (69 of 6,545 decks)
- Rex, Cyber-Hound relevance 1.58 · 1.8% (15 of 843 decks)
- Noble Heritage // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.69 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Dragon Man, Reformed Robot relevance 0.43 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 0.35 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Chronic Flooding relevance 1.89 · 28.7% (48 of 167 decks)
- Alchemist's Apprentice relevance 1.85 · 28.7% (48 of 167 decks)
- Bond of Insight relevance 1.69 · 26.9% (45 of 167 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 1.68 · 26.3% (44 of 167 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 1.65 · 24.0% (40 of 167 decks)
- Chain to Memory relevance 1.59 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Cephalid Inkshrouder relevance 1.58 · 24.6% (41 of 167 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 1.57 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Beetle, Legacy Criminal relevance 1.56 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Deranged Assistant relevance 1.55 · 28.7% (48 of 167 decks)
- Benthic Biomancer relevance 1.55 · 27.5% (46 of 167 decks)
- Ambassador Laquatus relevance 1.54 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 1.54 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Case the Joint relevance 1.53 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Careful Consideration relevance 1.53 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Binding Geist // Spectral Binding relevance 1.53 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.53 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Boing! relevance 1.52 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Behind the Mask relevance 1.52 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Cast Through Time relevance 1.51 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Catalog relevance 1.51 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Archmage's Newt relevance 1.50 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Bay Falcon relevance 1.50 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Chill relevance 1.49 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Bounty Agent relevance 1.49 · 25.1% (42 of 167 decks)
- Captain of Umbar relevance 1.48 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Call to the Kindred relevance 1.47 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Chancellor of the Spires relevance 1.47 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Bellowing Crier relevance 1.47 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Breakthrough relevance 1.46 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Alchemist's Apprentice relevance 1.85 · 28.7% (48 of 167 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 1.68 · 26.3% (44 of 167 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 1.65 · 24.0% (40 of 167 decks)
- Cephalid Inkshrouder relevance 1.58 · 24.6% (41 of 167 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 1.57 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Beetle, Legacy Criminal relevance 1.56 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Deranged Assistant relevance 1.55 · 28.7% (48 of 167 decks)
- Benthic Biomancer relevance 1.55 · 27.5% (46 of 167 decks)
- Ambassador Laquatus relevance 1.54 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Binding Geist // Spectral Binding relevance 1.53 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Archmage's Newt relevance 1.50 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Bay Falcon relevance 1.50 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Bounty Agent relevance 1.49 · 25.1% (42 of 167 decks)
- Captain of Umbar relevance 1.48 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Chancellor of the Spires relevance 1.47 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Bellowing Crier relevance 1.47 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 1.46 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Canyon Crab relevance 1.46 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Aberrant Researcher // Perfected Form relevance 1.45 · 21.6% (36 of 167 decks)
- Brotherhood Scribe relevance 1.45 · 25.1% (42 of 167 decks)
- Bonded Fetch relevance 1.44 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Blizzard Strix relevance 1.44 · 21.0% (35 of 167 decks)
- Aquatic Alchemist // Bubble Up relevance 1.43 · 21.6% (36 of 167 decks)
- Children of Korlis relevance 1.42 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Candlestick relevance 1.42 · 25.7% (43 of 167 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Chronic Flooding relevance 1.89 · 28.7% (48 of 167 decks)
- Cast Through Time relevance 1.51 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Chill relevance 1.49 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Call to the Kindred relevance 1.47 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Capture Sphere relevance 1.46 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Case of the Filched Falcon relevance 1.43 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Ballad of the Black Flag relevance 1.42 · 24.0% (40 of 167 decks)
All instants (14)
- Chain to Memory relevance 1.59 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 1.54 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Case the Joint relevance 1.53 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Careful Consideration relevance 1.53 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.53 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Boing! relevance 1.52 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Behind the Mask relevance 1.52 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Catalog relevance 1.51 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Chemister's Insight relevance 1.44 · 24.0% (40 of 167 decks)
- Cerebral Download relevance 1.44 · 24.0% (40 of 167 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 1.43 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 1.42 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Bewildering Blizzard relevance 1.42 · 21.0% (35 of 167 decks)
- Blinkmoth Infusion relevance 1.42 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Bond of Insight relevance 1.69 · 26.9% (45 of 167 decks)
- Breakthrough relevance 1.46 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 1.46 · 29.9% (50 of 167 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 1.44 · 21.0% (35 of 167 decks)
EDH data for Cephalid Illusionist: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 167 real decks.









































