Ice Flan
Played in 493 Blue decks
3030+27+4+6+7+6+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Jill, Shiva's Dominant // Shiva, Warden of Ice 20.9% of decks
Jill, Shiva's Dominant // Shiva, Warden of Ice 20.9% of decks
Lulu, Stern Guardian 7.0% of decks
Lulu, Stern Guardian 7.0% of decks
Y'shtola Rhul 3.0% of decks
Y'shtola Rhul 3.0% of decks
Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus 6.4% of decks
Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus 6.4% of decks
Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist 14.3% of decks
Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist 14.3% of decks
Ultimecia, Temporal Threat 4.4% of decks
Ultimecia, Temporal Threat 4.4% of decks
Most Relevant
Summon: Shiva 45.2% of decks
Summon: Shiva 45.2% of decks
Ice Magic 32.5% of decks
Ice Magic 32.5% of decks
Summon: Valefor 31.0% of decks
Summon: Valefor 31.0% of decks
Ultimecia, Temporal Threat 29.6% of decks
Ultimecia, Temporal Threat 29.6% of decks
Quistis Trepe 27.0% of decks
Quistis Trepe 27.0% of decks
Stuck in Summoner's Sanctum 21.5% of decks
Stuck in Summoner's Sanctum 21.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Jill, Shiva's Dominant // Shiva, Warden of Ice relevance 3.91 · 20.9% (120 of 575 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 2.47 · 7.0% (54 of 768 decks)
- Y'shtola Rhul relevance 1.75 · 3.0% (43 of 1,445 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.58 · 6.4% (13 of 204 decks)
- Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist relevance 1.34 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Ultimecia, Temporal Threat relevance 1.04 · 4.4% (6 of 135 decks)
- Iymrith, Desert Doom relevance 0.95 · 4.3% (5 of 115 decks)
- Rikku, Resourceful Guardian relevance 0.87 · 2.3% (7 of 305 decks)
- Donatello, Rad Scientist relevance 0.85 · 16.7% (2 of 12 decks)
- Stitcher Geralf relevance 0.82 · 3.9% (4 of 102 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 0.81 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.68 · 1.8% (5 of 273 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.64 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Dungeon Delver // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.56 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- The Lunar Whale relevance 0.55 · 3.8% (2 of 53 decks)
- Donatello, Way with Machines relevance 0.54 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
- Tromokratis relevance 0.51 · 1.7% (3 of 178 decks)
- Gadwick, the Wizened relevance 0.50 · 1.6% (3 of 185 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.42 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro relevance 0.41 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Ty Lee, Chi Blocker relevance 0.38 · 1.5% (2 of 134 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief relevance 0.37 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Hapatra, the Desert Frost relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.27 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Saruman the White relevance 0.27 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment relevance 0.23 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
- Orysa, Tide Choreographer relevance 0.22 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.21 · 1.1% (1 of 88 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Summon: Shiva relevance 2.08 · 45.2% (223 of 493 decks)
- Ice Magic relevance 1.59 · 32.5% (160 of 493 decks)
- Summon: Valefor relevance 1.48 · 31.0% (153 of 493 decks)
- Ultimecia, Temporal Threat relevance 1.35 · 29.6% (146 of 493 decks)
- Quistis Trepe relevance 1.26 · 27.0% (133 of 493 decks)
- Stuck in Summoner's Sanctum relevance 1.17 · 21.5% (106 of 493 decks)
- Fear of Sleep Paralysis relevance 1.15 · 24.3% (120 of 493 decks)
- Freeze in Place relevance 1.06 · 20.5% (101 of 493 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 1.05 · 26.2% (129 of 493 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.03 · 18.1% (89 of 493 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 0.97 · 20.9% (103 of 493 decks)
- Floodpits Drowner relevance 0.92 · 21.3% (105 of 493 decks)
- Daggermaw Megalodon relevance 0.85 · 14.2% (70 of 493 decks)
- Sleep Magic relevance 0.83 · 13.8% (68 of 493 decks)
- Giant Koi relevance 0.83 · 15.2% (75 of 493 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.77 · 17.8% (88 of 493 decks)
- Y'shtola Rhul relevance 0.77 · 19.9% (98 of 493 decks)
- Marauding Brinefang relevance 0.75 · 11.6% (57 of 493 decks)
- Observed Stasis relevance 0.73 · 15.6% (77 of 493 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.72 · 21.1% (104 of 493 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.71 · 15.8% (78 of 493 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 0.70 · 16.4% (81 of 493 decks)
- Crashing Wave relevance 0.70 · 14.6% (72 of 493 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.70 · 20.3% (100 of 493 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.68 · 20.5% (101 of 493 decks)
- Succumb to the Cold relevance 0.67 · 11.4% (56 of 493 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.65 · 20.5% (101 of 493 decks)
- Out Cold relevance 0.65 · 11.8% (58 of 493 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.65 · 21.1% (104 of 493 decks)
- Eject relevance 0.64 · 12.8% (63 of 493 decks)
All creatures (27)
- Summon: Shiva relevance 2.08 · 45.2% (223 of 493 decks)
- Summon: Valefor relevance 1.48 · 31.0% (153 of 493 decks)
- Ultimecia, Temporal Threat relevance 1.35 · 29.6% (146 of 493 decks)
- Quistis Trepe relevance 1.26 · 27.0% (133 of 493 decks)
- Fear of Sleep Paralysis relevance 1.15 · 24.3% (120 of 493 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 1.05 · 26.2% (129 of 493 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.03 · 18.1% (89 of 493 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 0.97 · 20.9% (103 of 493 decks)
- Floodpits Drowner relevance 0.92 · 21.3% (105 of 493 decks)
- Daggermaw Megalodon relevance 0.85 · 14.2% (70 of 493 decks)
- Giant Koi relevance 0.83 · 15.2% (75 of 493 decks)
- Y'shtola Rhul relevance 0.77 · 19.9% (98 of 493 decks)
- Marauding Brinefang relevance 0.75 · 11.6% (57 of 493 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.70 · 20.3% (100 of 493 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.65 · 20.5% (101 of 493 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 0.63 · 14.6% (72 of 493 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.61 · 17.2% (85 of 493 decks)
- Rowdy Snowballers relevance 0.61 · 9.7% (48 of 493 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.60 · 14.8% (73 of 493 decks)
- Jill, Shiva's Dominant // Shiva, Warden of Ice relevance 0.57 · 13.2% (65 of 493 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.57 · 8.9% (44 of 493 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.56 · 18.9% (93 of 493 decks)
- Hraesvelgr of the First Brood relevance 0.53 · 10.3% (51 of 493 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.53 · 20.5% (101 of 493 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.53 · 17.4% (86 of 493 decks)
- Dragoon's Wyvern relevance 0.52 · 7.9% (39 of 493 decks)
- Mechanozoa relevance 0.52 · 9.5% (47 of 493 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.65 · 21.1% (104 of 493 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.57 · 24.7% (122 of 493 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.53 · 15.8% (78 of 493 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.52 · 15.8% (78 of 493 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Stuck in Summoner's Sanctum relevance 1.17 · 21.5% (106 of 493 decks)
- Sleep Magic relevance 0.83 · 13.8% (68 of 493 decks)
- Observed Stasis relevance 0.73 · 15.6% (77 of 493 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.71 · 15.8% (78 of 493 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.68 · 20.5% (101 of 493 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 0.58 · 13.8% (68 of 493 decks)
All instants (7)
- Ice Magic relevance 1.59 · 32.5% (160 of 493 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 0.70 · 16.4% (81 of 493 decks)
- Succumb to the Cold relevance 0.67 · 11.4% (56 of 493 decks)
- Out Cold relevance 0.65 · 11.8% (58 of 493 decks)
- Eject relevance 0.64 · 12.8% (63 of 493 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.56 · 17.0% (84 of 493 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.51 · 23.5% (116 of 493 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Freeze in Place relevance 1.06 · 20.5% (101 of 493 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.77 · 17.8% (88 of 493 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.72 · 21.1% (104 of 493 decks)
- Crashing Wave relevance 0.70 · 14.6% (72 of 493 decks)
- Impede Momentum relevance 0.63 · 11.6% (57 of 493 decks)
- Stall Out relevance 0.52 · 8.9% (44 of 493 decks)
EDH data for Ice Flan: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 493 real decks.

























































