Deconstruct
Played in 184 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
8.4% Simic
All commanders (5)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 1.28 · 3.6% (5 of 139 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.67 · 2.0% (2 of 101 decks)
- Ant-Man, Colony Commander relevance 0.58 · 1.3% (2 of 157 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.53 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Kianne, Dean of Substance // Imbraham, Dean of Theory relevance 0.37 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Naturalize relevance 0.76 · 17.4% (32 of 184 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.57 · 9.8% (18 of 184 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.56 · 16.3% (30 of 184 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.52 · 12.5% (23 of 184 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.49 · 38.6% (71 of 184 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.46 · 28.8% (53 of 184 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.45 · 25.5% (47 of 184 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.43 · 30.4% (56 of 184 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (19 of 184 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.42 · 9.2% (17 of 184 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.41 · 13.0% (24 of 184 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.41 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
- Crack Open relevance 0.41 · 6.5% (12 of 184 decks)
- Watertrap Weaver relevance 0.40 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.39 · 16.8% (31 of 184 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.38 · 27.2% (50 of 184 decks)
- Sprouting Vines relevance 0.37 · 6.5% (12 of 184 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.37 · 6.5% (12 of 184 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.37 · 10.9% (20 of 184 decks)
- No Escape relevance 0.37 · 5.4% (10 of 184 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.37 · 28.8% (53 of 184 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.36 · 17.4% (32 of 184 decks)
- Citanul Hierophants relevance 0.36 · 7.6% (14 of 184 decks)
- Blinding Fog relevance 0.36 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.36 · 8.2% (15 of 184 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 0.35 · 5.4% (10 of 184 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.35 · 16.3% (30 of 184 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.35 · 9.8% (18 of 184 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.34 · 12.0% (22 of 184 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.34 · 5.4% (10 of 184 decks)
All creatures (6)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.49 · 38.6% (71 of 184 decks)
- Watertrap Weaver relevance 0.40 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.36 · 17.4% (32 of 184 decks)
- Citanul Hierophants relevance 0.36 · 7.6% (14 of 184 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.35 · 16.3% (30 of 184 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.34 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.43 · 30.4% (56 of 184 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.41 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.34 · 12.0% (22 of 184 decks)
- Darksteel Ingot relevance 0.32 · 5.4% (10 of 184 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.32 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.36 · 8.2% (15 of 184 decks)
All instants (18)
- Naturalize relevance 0.76 · 17.4% (32 of 184 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.57 · 9.8% (18 of 184 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.52 · 12.5% (23 of 184 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.46 · 28.8% (53 of 184 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (19 of 184 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.42 · 9.2% (17 of 184 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.39 · 16.8% (31 of 184 decks)
- Sprouting Vines relevance 0.37 · 6.5% (12 of 184 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.37 · 10.9% (20 of 184 decks)
- No Escape relevance 0.37 · 5.4% (10 of 184 decks)
- Blinding Fog relevance 0.36 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 0.35 · 5.4% (10 of 184 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.34 · 5.4% (10 of 184 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.33 · 16.3% (30 of 184 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.32 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (9 of 184 decks)
- Confound relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (9 of 184 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.31 · 9.2% (17 of 184 decks)
All sorceries (13)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.56 · 16.3% (30 of 184 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.45 · 25.5% (47 of 184 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.41 · 13.0% (24 of 184 decks)
- Crack Open relevance 0.41 · 6.5% (12 of 184 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.38 · 27.2% (50 of 184 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.37 · 6.5% (12 of 184 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.37 · 28.8% (53 of 184 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.35 · 9.8% (18 of 184 decks)
- Revive relevance 0.33 · 4.9% (9 of 184 decks)
- Atraxa's Fall relevance 0.32 · 5.4% (10 of 184 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.32 · 8.2% (15 of 184 decks)
- Energy Tap relevance 0.32 · 5.4% (10 of 184 decks)
- Nature's Spiral relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (9 of 184 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.37 · 8.7% (16 of 184 decks)
All lands (6)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.46 · 23.4% (43 of 184 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.45 · 12.0% (22 of 184 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.43 · 26.6% (49 of 184 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.38 · 14.7% (27 of 184 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.38 · 9.8% (18 of 184 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.31 · 9.8% (18 of 184 decks)
EDH data for Deconstruct: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 184 real decks.