Backstreet Bruiser
Played in 68 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
21.1% Blue
All commanders (5)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 4.15 · 20.4% (33 of 162 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.04 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.51 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
- Orysa, Tide Choreographer relevance 0.46 · 1.3% (1 of 76 decks)
- Alirios, Enraptured relevance 0.43 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 3.96 · 63.2% (43 of 68 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 3.63 · 54.4% (37 of 68 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 3.23 · 55.9% (38 of 68 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 3.19 · 51.5% (35 of 68 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 2.96 · 60.3% (41 of 68 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 2.83 · 51.5% (35 of 68 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 2.74 · 55.9% (38 of 68 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 2.72 · 48.5% (33 of 68 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 2.67 · 47.1% (32 of 68 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 2.33 · 44.1% (30 of 68 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 2.13 · 35.3% (24 of 68 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 2.05 · 32.4% (22 of 68 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 1.98 · 33.8% (23 of 68 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 1.97 · 30.9% (21 of 68 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.94 · 35.3% (24 of 68 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.91 · 36.8% (25 of 68 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.89 · 44.1% (30 of 68 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.81 · 52.9% (36 of 68 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.74 · 33.8% (23 of 68 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.56 · 32.4% (22 of 68 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.50 · 26.5% (18 of 68 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.42 · 25.0% (17 of 68 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 1.36 · 22.1% (15 of 68 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.36 · 38.2% (26 of 68 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.33 · 42.6% (29 of 68 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.26 · 25.0% (17 of 68 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.24 · 22.1% (15 of 68 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 1.14 · 22.1% (15 of 68 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.12 · 22.1% (15 of 68 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.12 · 23.5% (16 of 68 decks)
All creatures (33)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 3.96 · 63.2% (43 of 68 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 3.63 · 54.4% (37 of 68 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 3.23 · 55.9% (38 of 68 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 3.19 · 51.5% (35 of 68 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 2.96 · 60.3% (41 of 68 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 2.83 · 51.5% (35 of 68 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 2.74 · 55.9% (38 of 68 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 2.72 · 48.5% (33 of 68 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 2.67 · 47.1% (32 of 68 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 2.33 · 44.1% (30 of 68 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 2.05 · 32.4% (22 of 68 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 1.97 · 30.9% (21 of 68 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.94 · 35.3% (24 of 68 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.91 · 36.8% (25 of 68 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.81 · 52.9% (36 of 68 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.74 · 33.8% (23 of 68 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.50 · 26.5% (18 of 68 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.42 · 25.0% (17 of 68 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 1.36 · 22.1% (15 of 68 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.33 · 42.6% (29 of 68 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.26 · 25.0% (17 of 68 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 1.14 · 22.1% (15 of 68 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.12 · 23.5% (16 of 68 decks)
- Sealock Monster relevance 1.09 · 16.2% (11 of 68 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 1.06 · 32.4% (22 of 68 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.89 · 22.1% (15 of 68 decks)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 0.85 · 16.2% (11 of 68 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 0.79 · 11.8% (8 of 68 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.75 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Shapesharer relevance 0.73 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Adaptive Automaton relevance 0.66 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.65 · 20.6% (14 of 68 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 0.58 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.90 · 16.2% (11 of 68 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.86 · 27.9% (19 of 68 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 2.13 · 35.3% (24 of 68 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.89 · 44.1% (30 of 68 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.24 · 22.1% (15 of 68 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.12 · 22.1% (15 of 68 decks)
- Levitation relevance 1.07 · 20.6% (14 of 68 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.71 · 19.1% (13 of 68 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 1.98 · 33.8% (23 of 68 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.56 · 32.4% (22 of 68 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.36 · 38.2% (26 of 68 decks)
- Crush of Tentacles relevance 0.93 · 17.6% (12 of 68 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.66 · 20.6% (14 of 68 decks)
- Sleep relevance 0.65 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.65 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.67 · 27.9% (19 of 68 decks)
All lands (1)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.59 · 16.2% (11 of 68 decks)
EDH data for Backstreet Bruiser: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 68 real decks.