Into the North
Played in 830 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (11)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 1.50 · 2.1% (54 of 2,596 decks)
- Rocco, Cabaretti Caterer relevance 1.15 · 1.1% (63 of 5,619 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 0.99 · 2.7% (10 of 375 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.85 · 3.1% (6 of 194 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.80 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.76 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.62 · 2.2% (4 of 180 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Prava of the Steel Legion // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.21 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
- Keleth, Sunmane Familiar // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.19 · 1.1% (1 of 87 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.18 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
All most relevant (23)
- Shared Roots relevance 1.05 · 35.8% (297 of 830 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.89 · 66.1% (549 of 830 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.89 · 32.0% (266 of 830 decks)
- Glimpse the Core relevance 0.64 · 11.4% (95 of 830 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.64 · 23.5% (195 of 830 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (91 of 830 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.45 · 14.8% (123 of 830 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.43 · 28.1% (233 of 830 decks)
- Etali, Primal Conqueror // Etali, Primal Sickness relevance 0.42 · 20.8% (173 of 830 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.42 · 31.3% (260 of 830 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.40 · 16.0% (133 of 830 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.40 · 7.2% (60 of 830 decks)
- Goblin Bombardment relevance 0.40 · 13.7% (114 of 830 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.39 · 8.4% (70 of 830 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.39 · 18.2% (151 of 830 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.38 · 25.8% (214 of 830 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.38 · 26.1% (217 of 830 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.38 · 24.1% (200 of 830 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.38 · 19.8% (164 of 830 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.37 · 13.4% (111 of 830 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.36 · 13.6% (113 of 830 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.35 · 18.9% (157 of 830 decks)
- Palani's Hatcher relevance 0.35 · 14.6% (121 of 830 decks)
All creatures (3)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.89 · 32.0% (266 of 830 decks)
- Etali, Primal Conqueror // Etali, Primal Sickness relevance 0.42 · 20.8% (173 of 830 decks)
- Palani's Hatcher relevance 0.35 · 14.6% (121 of 830 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.35 · 18.9% (157 of 830 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.45 · 14.8% (123 of 830 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.40 · 16.0% (133 of 830 decks)
- Goblin Bombardment relevance 0.40 · 13.7% (114 of 830 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.38 · 25.8% (214 of 830 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.36 · 13.6% (113 of 830 decks)
All instants (3)
- Beast Within relevance 0.42 · 31.3% (260 of 830 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.38 · 24.1% (200 of 830 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.38 · 19.8% (164 of 830 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Shared Roots relevance 1.05 · 35.8% (297 of 830 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.89 · 66.1% (549 of 830 decks)
- Glimpse the Core relevance 0.64 · 11.4% (95 of 830 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.64 · 23.5% (195 of 830 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (91 of 830 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.43 · 28.1% (233 of 830 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.40 · 7.2% (60 of 830 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.39 · 8.4% (70 of 830 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.39 · 18.2% (151 of 830 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.38 · 26.1% (217 of 830 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.37 · 13.4% (111 of 830 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.43 · 16.9% (140 of 830 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.43 · 16.1% (134 of 830 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.40 · 21.2% (176 of 830 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.38 · 11.0% (91 of 830 decks)
- Sheltering Landscape relevance 0.36 · 16.1% (134 of 830 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.36 · 12.0% (100 of 830 decks)
All lands (21)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 2.92 · 69.2% (574 of 830 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 2.92 · 70.7% (587 of 830 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 2.87 · 69.0% (573 of 830 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 1.79 · 38.8% (322 of 830 decks)
- Highland Forest relevance 1.78 · 38.6% (320 of 830 decks)
- Alpine Meadow relevance 1.48 · 31.6% (262 of 830 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.53 · 42.0% (349 of 830 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.51 · 36.7% (305 of 830 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.45 · 26.3% (218 of 830 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.43 · 13.4% (111 of 830 decks)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 0.41 · 25.8% (214 of 830 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.40 · 24.7% (205 of 830 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.40 · 29.0% (241 of 830 decks)
- Spectator Seating relevance 0.40 · 26.5% (220 of 830 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.39 · 28.8% (239 of 830 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.39 · 20.0% (166 of 830 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.38 · 27.1% (225 of 830 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.37 · 13.0% (108 of 830 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.37 · 12.5% (104 of 830 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.36 · 12.2% (101 of 830 decks)
- Arctic Flats relevance 0.36 · 5.4% (45 of 830 decks)
EDH data for Into the North: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 830 real decks.