Fires of Invention
Played in 86 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
230+14+4+19+2+8+3+
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Darigaaz Reincarnated relevance 1.20 · 2.4% (4 of 168 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.44 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mogis, God of Slaughter relevance 0.95 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Stranglehold relevance 0.95 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
- Dictate of the Twin Gods relevance 0.90 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Price of Progress relevance 0.90 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Repercussion relevance 0.87 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.87 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Roiling Vortex relevance 0.85 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
- Fated Firepower relevance 0.84 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Furnace of Rath relevance 0.84 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Gratuitous Violence relevance 0.83 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Heartless Hidetsugu relevance 0.77 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- City on Fire relevance 0.76 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Kaervek the Merciless relevance 0.74 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Manabarbs relevance 0.72 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Sulfuric Vortex relevance 0.71 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Horizon Stone relevance 0.70 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.69 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Harsh Mentor relevance 0.69 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.68 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.67 · 29.1% (25 of 86 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.67 · 27.9% (24 of 86 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.67 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Citadel of Pain relevance 0.67 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Klothys, God of Destiny relevance 0.65 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Mana Flare relevance 0.65 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Burning Earth relevance 0.65 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Leyline Tyrant relevance 0.65 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.64 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Wheel of Misfortune relevance 0.63 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Power Surge relevance 0.62 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Mogis, God of Slaughter relevance 0.95 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.87 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Heartless Hidetsugu relevance 0.77 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Kaervek the Merciless relevance 0.74 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Harsh Mentor relevance 0.69 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.68 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.67 · 27.9% (24 of 86 decks)
- Klothys, God of Destiny relevance 0.65 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Leyline Tyrant relevance 0.65 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.64 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Belbe, Corrupted Observer relevance 0.60 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Decadent Dragon // Expensive Taste relevance 0.57 · 12.8% (11 of 86 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 0.51 · 12.8% (11 of 86 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.51 · 29.1% (25 of 86 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Horizon Stone relevance 0.70 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.67 · 29.1% (25 of 86 decks)
- Talisman of Indulgence relevance 0.52 · 22.1% (19 of 86 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.49 · 12.8% (11 of 86 decks)
All enchantments (19)
- Stranglehold relevance 0.95 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
- Dictate of the Twin Gods relevance 0.90 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Repercussion relevance 0.87 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Roiling Vortex relevance 0.85 · 15.1% (13 of 86 decks)
- Fated Firepower relevance 0.84 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Furnace of Rath relevance 0.84 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Gratuitous Violence relevance 0.83 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- City on Fire relevance 0.76 · 17.4% (15 of 86 decks)
- Manabarbs relevance 0.72 · 19.8% (17 of 86 decks)
- Sulfuric Vortex relevance 0.71 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Citadel of Pain relevance 0.67 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Mana Flare relevance 0.65 · 18.6% (16 of 86 decks)
- Burning Earth relevance 0.65 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Power Surge relevance 0.62 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Underworld Dreams relevance 0.61 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Spiteful Visions relevance 0.58 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Aid from the Cowl relevance 0.57 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.50 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.48 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
All instants (2)
- Price of Progress relevance 0.90 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Bedevil relevance 0.52 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.69 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.67 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Wheel of Misfortune relevance 0.63 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Crackle with Power relevance 0.59 · 14.0% (12 of 86 decks)
- Deadly Tempest relevance 0.55 · 9.3% (8 of 86 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.53 · 16.3% (14 of 86 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.50 · 26.7% (23 of 86 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.48 · 22.1% (19 of 86 decks)
All lands (3)
- Game Trail relevance 0.82 · 29.1% (25 of 86 decks)
- Foreboding Ruins relevance 0.61 · 20.9% (18 of 86 decks)
- Darigaaz's Caldera relevance 0.50 · 12.8% (11 of 86 decks)
EDH data for Fires of Invention: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 86 real decks.





















































