Heroic Intervention
Played in 55,418 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (30)
- Thranduil, the Elvenking relevance 1.64 · 42.9% (5,403 of 12,607 decks)
- Maralen, Fae Ascendant relevance 1.43 · 31.8% (8,656 of 27,241 decks)
- The Wise Mothman relevance 1.42 · 32.3% (7,493 of 23,169 decks)
- Zaxara, the Exemplary relevance 1.37 · 34.3% (3,988 of 11,642 decks)
- Uugguu, the Omniplasm relevance 1.33 · 38.0% (1,877 of 4,938 decks)
- Homer, the Hermit relevance 1.16 · 32.1% (1,563 of 4,871 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 1.16 · 29.9% (2,158 of 7,228 decks)
- Felix Five-Boots relevance 1.14 · 34.4% (944 of 2,744 decks)
- Indominus Rex, Alpha relevance 1.09 · 29.3% (1,483 of 5,067 decks)
- The Master, Transcendent relevance 1.06 · 32.9% (743 of 2,258 decks)
- Kotis, the Fangkeeper relevance 1.00 · 24.2% (2,282 of 9,445 decks)
- Volrath, the Shapestealer relevance 0.98 · 30.4% (618 of 2,030 decks)
- Otrimi, the Ever-Playful relevance 0.94 · 29.3% (565 of 1,930 decks)
- Brokkos, Apex of Forever relevance 0.91 · 31.6% (328 of 1,037 decks)
- Gonti, Canny Acquisitor relevance 0.91 · 23.6% (1,240 of 5,262 decks)
- Ukkima, Stalking Shadow // Cazur, Ruthless Stalker relevance 0.87 · 26.1% (583 of 2,234 decks)
- Tatsunari, Toad Rider relevance 0.87 · 25.3% (645 of 2,552 decks)
- Kadena, Slinking Sorcerer relevance 0.80 · 21.6% (840 of 3,897 decks)
- Zimone and Dina relevance 0.77 · 21.1% (731 of 3,470 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.77 · 39.8% (66 of 166 decks)
- Teval, the Balanced Scale relevance 0.77 · 15.3% (4,211 of 27,542 decks)
- Xavier Sal, Infested Captain relevance 0.75 · 19.8% (796 of 4,014 decks)
- Jorn, God of Winter // Kaldring, the Rimestaff relevance 0.75 · 20.8% (608 of 2,922 decks)
- Damia, Sage of Stone relevance 0.70 · 21.4% (358 of 1,672 decks)
- Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 0.69 · 20.2% (438 of 2,164 decks)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 0.67 · 18.5% (525 of 2,831 decks)
- Nashi, Moon's Legacy relevance 0.65 · 24.0% (152 of 634 decks)
- Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 0.62 · 13.5% (1,873 of 13,907 decks)
- Vorosh, the Hunter relevance 0.60 · 26.1% (80 of 306 decks)
- Henry Wu, InGen Geneticist relevance 0.58 · 21.1% (137 of 649 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.61 · 47.1% (26,116 of 55,418 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.60 · 40.6% (22,493 of 55,418 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.57 · 36.7% (20,312 of 55,418 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.56 · 37.9% (21,030 of 55,418 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.53 · 36.4% (20,198 of 55,418 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.53 · 29.0% (16,074 of 55,418 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.52 · 29.9% (16,577 of 55,418 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.50 · 25.7% (14,248 of 55,418 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.49 · 27.9% (15,489 of 55,418 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.49 · 27.3% (15,118 of 55,418 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.49 · 30.6% (16,943 of 55,418 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.49 · 36.6% (20,308 of 55,418 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.48 · 24.7% (13,667 of 55,418 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.46 · 26.1% (14,480 of 55,418 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.45 · 31.2% (17,280 of 55,418 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.45 · 23.0% (12,768 of 55,418 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.45 · 19.8% (10,948 of 55,418 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.44 · 30.3% (16,766 of 55,418 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.44 · 18.8% (10,399 of 55,418 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.44 · 24.6% (13,618 of 55,418 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.43 · 18.7% (10,358 of 55,418 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.43 · 18.9% (10,450 of 55,418 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.40 · 17.3% (9,591 of 55,418 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.39 · 21.7% (12,012 of 55,418 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.39 · 20.0% (11,107 of 55,418 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.37 · 13.6% (7,544 of 55,418 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.37 · 13.4% (7,427 of 55,418 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.37 · 14.9% (8,262 of 55,418 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.36 · 15.6% (8,651 of 55,418 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.36 · 13.1% (7,277 of 55,418 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.49 · 27.9% (15,489 of 55,418 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.49 · 36.6% (20,308 of 55,418 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.44 · 30.3% (16,766 of 55,418 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.44 · 18.8% (10,399 of 55,418 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.44 · 24.6% (13,618 of 55,418 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.43 · 18.7% (10,358 of 55,418 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.43 · 18.9% (10,450 of 55,418 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.40 · 17.3% (9,591 of 55,418 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.37 · 13.6% (7,544 of 55,418 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.37 · 14.9% (8,262 of 55,418 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.36 · 13.1% (7,277 of 55,418 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.35 · 15.4% (8,560 of 55,418 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.35 · 15.2% (8,434 of 55,418 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 0.35 · 22.6% (12,500 of 55,418 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.57 · 36.7% (20,312 of 55,418 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.49 · 30.6% (16,943 of 55,418 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.46 · 26.1% (14,480 of 55,418 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.37 · 13.4% (7,427 of 55,418 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.36 · 15.6% (8,651 of 55,418 decks)
All instants (8)
- Beast Within relevance 0.56 · 37.9% (21,030 of 55,418 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.53 · 36.4% (20,198 of 55,418 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.53 · 29.0% (16,074 of 55,418 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.52 · 29.9% (16,577 of 55,418 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.50 · 25.7% (14,248 of 55,418 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.48 · 24.7% (13,667 of 55,418 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.45 · 23.0% (12,768 of 55,418 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.45 · 19.8% (10,948 of 55,418 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.61 · 47.1% (26,116 of 55,418 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.60 · 40.6% (22,493 of 55,418 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.49 · 27.3% (15,118 of 55,418 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.45 · 31.2% (17,280 of 55,418 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.39 · 21.7% (12,012 of 55,418 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.39 · 20.0% (11,107 of 55,418 decks)
All utility lands (10)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.56 · 33.2% (18,378 of 55,418 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.51 · 33.1% (18,341 of 55,418 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.49 · 30.4% (16,855 of 55,418 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.48 · 34.7% (19,210 of 55,418 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.44 · 22.8% (12,621 of 55,418 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.41 · 28.8% (15,941 of 55,418 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.40 · 21.1% (11,669 of 55,418 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.38 · 21.2% (11,723 of 55,418 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.36 · 19.5% (10,812 of 55,418 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.36 · 17.8% (9,851 of 55,418 decks)
All lands (7)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.63 · 49.8% (27,622 of 55,418 decks)
- Undergrowth Stadium relevance 0.61 · 47.9% (26,545 of 55,418 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.56 · 35.6% (19,721 of 55,418 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.43 · 24.6% (13,644 of 55,418 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.40 · 29.5% (16,337 of 55,418 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.38 · 22.1% (12,252 of 55,418 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.38 · 18.6% (10,313 of 55,418 decks)
EDH data for Heroic Intervention: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 55,418 real decks.