Ancient Ooze
Played in 203 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
7.5% Simic
- Sultai 1,109 · 40.9%
- Green 889 · 32.8%
- Simic 203 · 7.5%
- Gruul 135 · 5.0%
- Golgari 112 · 4.1%
- Five-Color 55 · 2.0%
- Other (12) 207 · 7.6%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (9)
- Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 2.23 · 2.8% (29 of 1,038 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 2.17 · 3.1% (24 of 782 decks)
- It Came from Planet Glurg relevance 1.92 · 7.4% (9 of 122 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 1.46 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.69 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.67 · 1.1% (3 of 277 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.65 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Ignis Scientia relevance 0.59 · 1.5% (2 of 136 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.52 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ravenous Slime relevance 2.42 · 38.9% (79 of 203 decks)
- Biogenic Ooze relevance 2.39 · 46.8% (95 of 203 decks)
- Oran-Rief Ooze relevance 2.23 · 38.9% (79 of 203 decks)
- Mitotic Slime relevance 2.19 · 35.5% (72 of 203 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 2.16 · 35.5% (72 of 203 decks)
- Aeve, Progenitor Ooze relevance 2.12 · 39.4% (80 of 203 decks)
- Predator Ooze relevance 2.05 · 38.4% (78 of 203 decks)
- Consuming Blob relevance 1.98 · 29.1% (59 of 203 decks)
- Green Slime relevance 1.82 · 34.0% (69 of 203 decks)
- Biowaste Blob relevance 1.77 · 41.4% (84 of 203 decks)
- Experiment One relevance 1.71 · 32.0% (65 of 203 decks)
- Temperamental Oozewagg relevance 1.63 · 26.6% (54 of 203 decks)
- Ochre Jelly relevance 1.53 · 33.0% (67 of 203 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 1.41 · 35.0% (71 of 203 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 1.22 · 24.1% (49 of 203 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 1.21 · 24.6% (50 of 203 decks)
- Slime Against Humanity relevance 1.21 · 25.1% (51 of 203 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 1.18 · 36.5% (74 of 203 decks)
- Ooze Flux relevance 1.17 · 18.2% (37 of 203 decks)
- Mystic Genesis relevance 1.13 · 18.2% (37 of 203 decks)
- Gelatinous Genesis relevance 1.00 · 18.7% (38 of 203 decks)
- Printlifter Ooze relevance 0.99 · 17.7% (36 of 203 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 0.83 · 15.3% (31 of 203 decks)
- Ice Flan relevance 0.81 · 11.8% (24 of 203 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.72 · 24.6% (50 of 203 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.68 · 20.7% (42 of 203 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.60 · 13.3% (27 of 203 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.60 · 33.0% (67 of 203 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.58 · 11.3% (23 of 203 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.55 · 10.8% (22 of 203 decks)
All creatures (34)
- Ravenous Slime relevance 2.42 · 38.9% (79 of 203 decks)
- Biogenic Ooze relevance 2.39 · 46.8% (95 of 203 decks)
- Oran-Rief Ooze relevance 2.23 · 38.9% (79 of 203 decks)
- Mitotic Slime relevance 2.19 · 35.5% (72 of 203 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 2.16 · 35.5% (72 of 203 decks)
- Aeve, Progenitor Ooze relevance 2.12 · 39.4% (80 of 203 decks)
- Predator Ooze relevance 2.05 · 38.4% (78 of 203 decks)
- Consuming Blob relevance 1.98 · 29.1% (59 of 203 decks)
- Green Slime relevance 1.82 · 34.0% (69 of 203 decks)
- Biowaste Blob relevance 1.77 · 41.4% (84 of 203 decks)
- Experiment One relevance 1.71 · 32.0% (65 of 203 decks)
- Temperamental Oozewagg relevance 1.63 · 26.6% (54 of 203 decks)
- Ochre Jelly relevance 1.53 · 33.0% (67 of 203 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 1.41 · 35.0% (71 of 203 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 1.21 · 24.6% (50 of 203 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 1.18 · 36.5% (74 of 203 decks)
- Printlifter Ooze relevance 0.99 · 17.7% (36 of 203 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 0.83 · 15.3% (31 of 203 decks)
- Ice Flan relevance 0.81 · 11.8% (24 of 203 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.72 · 24.6% (50 of 203 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.60 · 13.3% (27 of 203 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.58 · 11.3% (23 of 203 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.55 · 10.8% (22 of 203 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.53 · 11.8% (24 of 203 decks)
- Mutagen Man, Living Ooze relevance 0.51 · 13.3% (27 of 203 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.48 · 14.3% (29 of 203 decks)
- Canopy Gargantuan relevance 0.46 · 9.9% (20 of 203 decks)
- Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 0.44 · 8.9% (18 of 203 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.43 · 8.9% (18 of 203 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.43 · 11.8% (24 of 203 decks)
- Sludge Monster relevance 0.42 · 7.4% (15 of 203 decks)
- Krosan Drover relevance 0.40 · 7.9% (16 of 203 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.40 · 11.8% (24 of 203 decks)
- Ancient Adamantoise relevance 0.39 · 8.4% (17 of 203 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.43 · 16.3% (33 of 203 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.41 · 9.4% (19 of 203 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.40 · 28.1% (57 of 203 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 1.22 · 24.1% (49 of 203 decks)
- Ooze Flux relevance 1.17 · 18.2% (37 of 203 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.60 · 33.0% (67 of 203 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.43 · 19.7% (40 of 203 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.39 · 9.9% (20 of 203 decks)
All instants (3)
- Mystic Genesis relevance 1.13 · 18.2% (37 of 203 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.68 · 20.7% (42 of 203 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.44 · 11.3% (23 of 203 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Slime Against Humanity relevance 1.21 · 25.1% (51 of 203 decks)
- Gelatinous Genesis relevance 1.00 · 18.7% (38 of 203 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.41 · 32.0% (65 of 203 decks)
All lands (2)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.43 · 16.3% (33 of 203 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.38 · 11.8% (24 of 203 decks)
EDH data for Ancient Ooze: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 203 real decks.