330+42+3+1+3+1+
Color Identity Spread
2.1% Naya
Commanders
Most Relevant
Virulent Emissary 38.3% of decks
Virulent Emissary 38.3% of decks
Dwynen's Elite 31.1% of decks
Dwynen's Elite 31.1% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 47.8% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 47.8% of decks
Ambush Wolf 20.6% of decks
Ambush Wolf 20.6% of decks
Gangly Stompling 25.6% of decks
Gangly Stompling 25.6% of decks
Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen 25.0% of decks
Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen 25.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Voja, Jaws of the Conclave relevance 2.84 · 1.4% (141 of 9,813 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.45 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.35 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 2.07 · 38.3% (69 of 180 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.69 · 31.1% (56 of 180 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.64 · 47.8% (86 of 180 decks)
- Ambush Wolf relevance 1.37 · 20.6% (37 of 180 decks)
- Gangly Stompling relevance 1.35 · 25.6% (46 of 180 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.34 · 25.0% (45 of 180 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 1.31 · 32.2% (58 of 180 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.31 · 39.4% (71 of 180 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.29 · 25.6% (46 of 180 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.23 · 36.1% (65 of 180 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.23 · 63.9% (115 of 180 decks)
- Young Wolf relevance 1.22 · 21.1% (38 of 180 decks)
- Changeling Wayfinder relevance 1.21 · 26.1% (47 of 180 decks)
- Feisty Spikeling relevance 1.17 · 21.7% (39 of 180 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 1.16 · 26.1% (47 of 180 decks)
- Rhys, the Evermore relevance 1.13 · 19.4% (35 of 180 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 1.13 · 25.0% (45 of 180 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 1.09 · 21.7% (39 of 180 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 1.05 · 28.9% (52 of 180 decks)
- Hungry Ridgewolf relevance 1.03 · 15.6% (28 of 180 decks)
- Bounding Wolf relevance 1.00 · 15.0% (27 of 180 decks)
- Elvish Regrower relevance 0.98 · 15.6% (28 of 180 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.98 · 26.1% (47 of 180 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.96 · 16.7% (30 of 180 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.93 · 40.0% (72 of 180 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.92 · 25.0% (45 of 180 decks)
- Flourishing Hunter relevance 0.87 · 12.8% (23 of 180 decks)
- Packsong Pup relevance 0.87 · 17.2% (31 of 180 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.87 · 22.2% (40 of 180 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.85 · 23.9% (43 of 180 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 2.07 · 38.3% (69 of 180 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.69 · 31.1% (56 of 180 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.64 · 47.8% (86 of 180 decks)
- Ambush Wolf relevance 1.37 · 20.6% (37 of 180 decks)
- Gangly Stompling relevance 1.35 · 25.6% (46 of 180 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.34 · 25.0% (45 of 180 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 1.31 · 32.2% (58 of 180 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.31 · 39.4% (71 of 180 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.29 · 25.6% (46 of 180 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.23 · 36.1% (65 of 180 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.23 · 63.9% (115 of 180 decks)
- Young Wolf relevance 1.22 · 21.1% (38 of 180 decks)
- Changeling Wayfinder relevance 1.21 · 26.1% (47 of 180 decks)
- Feisty Spikeling relevance 1.17 · 21.7% (39 of 180 decks)
- Rhys, the Evermore relevance 1.13 · 19.4% (35 of 180 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 1.13 · 25.0% (45 of 180 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 1.09 · 21.7% (39 of 180 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 1.05 · 28.9% (52 of 180 decks)
- Hungry Ridgewolf relevance 1.03 · 15.6% (28 of 180 decks)
- Bounding Wolf relevance 1.00 · 15.0% (27 of 180 decks)
- Elvish Regrower relevance 0.98 · 15.6% (28 of 180 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.98 · 26.1% (47 of 180 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.96 · 16.7% (30 of 180 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.93 · 40.0% (72 of 180 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.92 · 25.0% (45 of 180 decks)
- Flourishing Hunter relevance 0.87 · 12.8% (23 of 180 decks)
- Packsong Pup relevance 0.87 · 17.2% (31 of 180 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.87 · 22.2% (40 of 180 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.85 · 23.9% (43 of 180 decks)
- Tolsimir, Friend to Wolves relevance 0.84 · 20.6% (37 of 180 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 0.83 · 12.8% (23 of 180 decks)
- Flock Impostor relevance 0.82 · 16.7% (30 of 180 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.82 · 13.9% (25 of 180 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.78 · 19.4% (35 of 180 decks)
- Torgal, A Fine Hound relevance 0.77 · 18.3% (33 of 180 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 0.75 · 26.1% (47 of 180 decks)
- Runebound Wolf relevance 0.73 · 12.2% (22 of 180 decks)
- Tolsimir Wolfblood relevance 0.72 · 16.1% (29 of 180 decks)
- Bloodbraid Elf relevance 0.71 · 13.3% (24 of 180 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 0.68 · 10.6% (19 of 180 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.64 · 11.7% (21 of 180 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.64 · 18.3% (33 of 180 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Firdoch Core relevance 1.16 · 26.1% (47 of 180 decks)
- Stalactite Dagger relevance 0.78 · 13.9% (25 of 180 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.69 · 29.4% (53 of 180 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Howling Moon relevance 0.71 · 17.2% (31 of 180 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.97 · 33.3% (60 of 180 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.72 · 23.9% (43 of 180 decks)
- Wind-Scarred Crag relevance 0.69 · 21.7% (39 of 180 decks)
All lands (1)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 1.15 · 18.3% (33 of 180 decks)
EDH data for Dawn's Light Archer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 180 real decks.





























