Tidal Force
Played in 134 Five-Color decks
130+47+1+1+1+
Color Identity Spread
6.5% Five-Color
Commanders
Most Relevant
Purity 20.1% of decks
Purity 20.1% of decks
Dread 19.4% of decks
Dread 19.4% of decks
Roil Elemental 20.9% of decks
Roil Elemental 20.9% of decks
Nyxbloom Ancient 28.4% of decks
Nyxbloom Ancient 28.4% of decks
Cavalier of Night 20.9% of decks
Cavalier of Night 20.9% of decks
Maelstrom Wanderer 40.3% of decks
Maelstrom Wanderer 40.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Horde of Notions relevance 2.32 · 1.4% (23 of 1,647 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Purity relevance 1.34 · 20.1% (27 of 134 decks)
- Dread relevance 1.25 · 19.4% (26 of 134 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 1.16 · 20.9% (28 of 134 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 1.01 · 28.4% (38 of 134 decks)
- Cavalier of Night relevance 0.93 · 20.9% (28 of 134 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 0.93 · 40.3% (54 of 134 decks)
- Bringer of the Red Dawn relevance 0.90 · 14.9% (20 of 134 decks)
- Cavalier of Flame relevance 0.89 · 20.1% (27 of 134 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 0.89 · 34.3% (46 of 134 decks)
- Cavalier of Dawn relevance 0.88 · 21.6% (29 of 134 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.87 · 34.3% (46 of 134 decks)
- Animar, Soul of Elements relevance 0.87 · 28.4% (38 of 134 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.86 · 36.6% (49 of 134 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 0.85 · 31.3% (42 of 134 decks)
- Twinflame Travelers relevance 0.84 · 29.1% (39 of 134 decks)
- Cavalier of Gales relevance 0.84 · 20.1% (27 of 134 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.83 · 17.2% (23 of 134 decks)
- Bringer of the Blue Dawn relevance 0.82 · 14.9% (20 of 134 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.81 · 25.4% (34 of 134 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.81 · 11.9% (16 of 134 decks)
- Bringer of the Green Dawn relevance 0.79 · 12.7% (17 of 134 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 0.79 · 20.9% (28 of 134 decks)
- Mass of Mysteries relevance 0.79 · 27.6% (37 of 134 decks)
- Flamekin Harbinger relevance 0.76 · 22.4% (30 of 134 decks)
- Smokebraider relevance 0.76 · 28.4% (38 of 134 decks)
- Yargle and Multani relevance 0.76 · 13.4% (18 of 134 decks)
- Bringer of the Black Dawn relevance 0.72 · 14.2% (19 of 134 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 0.71 · 24.6% (33 of 134 decks)
- Bringer of the White Dawn relevance 0.69 · 11.2% (15 of 134 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 0.67 · 22.4% (30 of 134 decks)
All creatures (47)
- Purity relevance 1.34 · 20.1% (27 of 134 decks)
- Dread relevance 1.25 · 19.4% (26 of 134 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 1.16 · 20.9% (28 of 134 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 1.01 · 28.4% (38 of 134 decks)
- Cavalier of Night relevance 0.93 · 20.9% (28 of 134 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 0.93 · 40.3% (54 of 134 decks)
- Bringer of the Red Dawn relevance 0.90 · 14.9% (20 of 134 decks)
- Cavalier of Flame relevance 0.89 · 20.1% (27 of 134 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 0.89 · 34.3% (46 of 134 decks)
- Cavalier of Dawn relevance 0.88 · 21.6% (29 of 134 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.87 · 34.3% (46 of 134 decks)
- Animar, Soul of Elements relevance 0.87 · 28.4% (38 of 134 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.86 · 36.6% (49 of 134 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 0.85 · 31.3% (42 of 134 decks)
- Twinflame Travelers relevance 0.84 · 29.1% (39 of 134 decks)
- Cavalier of Gales relevance 0.84 · 20.1% (27 of 134 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.83 · 17.2% (23 of 134 decks)
- Bringer of the Blue Dawn relevance 0.82 · 14.9% (20 of 134 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.81 · 25.4% (34 of 134 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.81 · 11.9% (16 of 134 decks)
- Bringer of the Green Dawn relevance 0.79 · 12.7% (17 of 134 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 0.79 · 20.9% (28 of 134 decks)
- Mass of Mysteries relevance 0.79 · 27.6% (37 of 134 decks)
- Flamekin Harbinger relevance 0.76 · 22.4% (30 of 134 decks)
- Smokebraider relevance 0.76 · 28.4% (38 of 134 decks)
- Yargle and Multani relevance 0.76 · 13.4% (18 of 134 decks)
- Bringer of the Black Dawn relevance 0.72 · 14.2% (19 of 134 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 0.71 · 24.6% (33 of 134 decks)
- Bringer of the White Dawn relevance 0.69 · 11.2% (15 of 134 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 0.67 · 22.4% (30 of 134 decks)
- Cloudthresher relevance 0.67 · 9.7% (13 of 134 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 0.67 · 26.9% (36 of 134 decks)
- Flamebraider relevance 0.65 · 24.6% (33 of 134 decks)
- Horde of Notions relevance 0.64 · 22.4% (30 of 134 decks)
- Jegantha, the Wellspring relevance 0.64 · 25.4% (34 of 134 decks)
- Dragon Broodmother relevance 0.63 · 11.9% (16 of 134 decks)
- Lord of Extinction relevance 0.63 · 9.7% (13 of 134 decks)
- Shroudstomper relevance 0.63 · 15.7% (21 of 134 decks)
- Tendershoot Dryad relevance 0.62 · 12.7% (17 of 134 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.61 · 23.1% (31 of 134 decks)
- Beledros Witherbloom relevance 0.61 · 14.2% (19 of 134 decks)
- Sphinx of the Second Sun relevance 0.60 · 11.9% (16 of 134 decks)
- Malignus relevance 0.60 · 9.0% (12 of 134 decks)
- Tyrant of Discord relevance 0.60 · 12.7% (17 of 134 decks)
- Flickerwisp relevance 0.60 · 11.2% (15 of 134 decks)
- Brokkos, Apex of Forever relevance 0.58 · 11.2% (15 of 134 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.58 · 11.2% (15 of 134 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Timeless Lotus relevance 0.58 · 27.6% (37 of 134 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Paradox Haze relevance 0.66 · 14.9% (20 of 134 decks)
All lands (1)
- Primal Beyond relevance 0.60 · 21.6% (29 of 134 decks)
EDH data for Tidal Force: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 134 real decks.



















