Tidal Force
Played in 60 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
All most relevant (30)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 1.42 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 1.22 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 1.20 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 1.05 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 1.05 · 43.3% (26 of 60 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 1.03 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.99 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.94 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.92 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.91 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.89 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Tidespout Tyrant relevance 0.88 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.84 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Shalai, Voice of Plenty relevance 0.84 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.83 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.83 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.80 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.80 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.79 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.79 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.74 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.73 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.72 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.72 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Smirking Spelljacker relevance 0.71 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 0.71 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Drumbellower relevance 0.69 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.69 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Sister of Silence relevance 0.69 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.67 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 1.42 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 1.22 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 1.20 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 1.05 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 1.05 · 43.3% (26 of 60 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 1.03 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.94 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.91 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.89 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Tidespout Tyrant relevance 0.88 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.84 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Shalai, Voice of Plenty relevance 0.84 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.83 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.83 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.80 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.80 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.79 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.74 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.72 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.72 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Smirking Spelljacker relevance 0.71 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 0.71 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Drumbellower relevance 0.69 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.69 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Sister of Silence relevance 0.69 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.67 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.64 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Great Oak Guardian relevance 0.62 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.62 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.62 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.60 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 0.59 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.59 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.58 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.56 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.56 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.52 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.52 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.51 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.49 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.79 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.73 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.58 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
All instants (1)
- Shore Up relevance 0.99 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.92 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.50 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
All lands (4)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.56 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.50 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.48 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.45 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
EDH data for Tidal Force: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 60 real decks.