Discerning Taste
Played in 214 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
530+13+1+2+11+19+2+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Araumi of the Dead Tide relevance 1.62 · 1.3% (25 of 1,980 decks)
- Taigam, Sidisi's Hand relevance 0.95 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Ludevic, Necrogenius // Olag, Ludevic's Hubris relevance 0.56 · 1.4% (2 of 146 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Armix, Filigree Thrasher relevance 0.41 · 2.1% (1 of 47 decks)
- Scion of Halaster // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.34 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Forbidden Alchemy relevance 1.13 · 27.1% (58 of 214 decks)
- Ransack the Lab relevance 1.00 · 16.8% (36 of 214 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.96 · 20.6% (44 of 214 decks)
- Commune with Evil relevance 0.92 · 14.5% (31 of 214 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.75 · 15.0% (32 of 214 decks)
- Resentful Revelation relevance 0.74 · 15.4% (33 of 214 decks)
- Corpse Churn relevance 0.73 · 14.0% (30 of 214 decks)
- Stitcher's Supplier relevance 0.65 · 22.0% (47 of 214 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.63 · 26.6% (57 of 214 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.58 · 20.1% (43 of 214 decks)
- Millikin relevance 0.57 · 17.8% (38 of 214 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.57 · 20.1% (43 of 214 decks)
- Diresight relevance 0.56 · 14.0% (30 of 214 decks)
- Gray Merchant of Asphodel relevance 0.56 · 27.1% (58 of 214 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.55 · 29.0% (62 of 214 decks)
- Zombify relevance 0.55 · 13.6% (29 of 214 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.54 · 32.7% (70 of 214 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.54 · 14.5% (31 of 214 decks)
- Deranged Assistant relevance 0.52 · 15.0% (32 of 214 decks)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 0.49 · 15.4% (33 of 214 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.48 · 19.2% (41 of 214 decks)
- Funeral Rites relevance 0.47 · 7.5% (16 of 214 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.47 · 10.7% (23 of 214 decks)
- Stitch Together relevance 0.47 · 14.0% (30 of 214 decks)
- Wail of the Forgotten relevance 0.47 · 9.8% (21 of 214 decks)
- Vile Entomber relevance 0.46 · 13.1% (28 of 214 decks)
- Mire Triton relevance 0.44 · 12.1% (26 of 214 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.44 · 21.0% (45 of 214 decks)
- Persist relevance 0.44 · 13.1% (28 of 214 decks)
- Notion Rain relevance 0.43 · 11.7% (25 of 214 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Stitcher's Supplier relevance 0.65 · 22.0% (47 of 214 decks)
- Millikin relevance 0.57 · 17.8% (38 of 214 decks)
- Gray Merchant of Asphodel relevance 0.56 · 27.1% (58 of 214 decks)
- Deranged Assistant relevance 0.52 · 15.0% (32 of 214 decks)
- Vile Entomber relevance 0.46 · 13.1% (28 of 214 decks)
- Mire Triton relevance 0.44 · 12.1% (26 of 214 decks)
- Obsessive Stitcher relevance 0.42 · 10.7% (23 of 214 decks)
- Accursed Marauder relevance 0.41 · 15.9% (34 of 214 decks)
- Fleshbag Marauder relevance 0.39 · 15.9% (34 of 214 decks)
- Grave Titan relevance 0.38 · 13.6% (29 of 214 decks)
- Cemetery Reaper relevance 0.38 · 15.0% (32 of 214 decks)
- Undead Butler relevance 0.38 · 9.3% (20 of 214 decks)
- Liliana's Elite relevance 0.38 · 6.1% (13 of 214 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.44 · 21.0% (45 of 214 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 0.49 · 15.4% (33 of 214 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.41 · 18.7% (40 of 214 decks)
All instants (11)
- Forbidden Alchemy relevance 1.13 · 27.1% (58 of 214 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.75 · 15.0% (32 of 214 decks)
- Corpse Churn relevance 0.73 · 14.0% (30 of 214 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.58 · 20.1% (43 of 214 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.54 · 32.7% (70 of 214 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.54 · 14.5% (31 of 214 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.48 · 19.2% (41 of 214 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.47 · 10.7% (23 of 214 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.43 · 12.1% (26 of 214 decks)
- Entomb relevance 0.38 · 15.9% (34 of 214 decks)
- Dihada's Ploy relevance 0.38 · 7.5% (16 of 214 decks)
All sorceries (19)
- Ransack the Lab relevance 1.00 · 16.8% (36 of 214 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.96 · 20.6% (44 of 214 decks)
- Commune with Evil relevance 0.92 · 14.5% (31 of 214 decks)
- Resentful Revelation relevance 0.74 · 15.4% (33 of 214 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.63 · 26.6% (57 of 214 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.57 · 20.1% (43 of 214 decks)
- Diresight relevance 0.56 · 14.0% (30 of 214 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.55 · 29.0% (62 of 214 decks)
- Zombify relevance 0.55 · 13.6% (29 of 214 decks)
- Funeral Rites relevance 0.47 · 7.5% (16 of 214 decks)
- Stitch Together relevance 0.47 · 14.0% (30 of 214 decks)
- Wail of the Forgotten relevance 0.47 · 9.8% (21 of 214 decks)
- Persist relevance 0.44 · 13.1% (28 of 214 decks)
- Notion Rain relevance 0.43 · 11.7% (25 of 214 decks)
- Living Death relevance 0.41 · 14.0% (30 of 214 decks)
- Incarnation Technique relevance 0.40 · 9.3% (20 of 214 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.38 · 9.8% (21 of 214 decks)
- Bone Shards relevance 0.37 · 8.4% (18 of 214 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.37 · 27.1% (58 of 214 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Waterfront District relevance 0.41 · 10.7% (23 of 214 decks)
- Port of Karfell relevance 0.38 · 12.6% (27 of 214 decks)
All lands (2)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.60 · 30.4% (65 of 214 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.46 · 23.4% (50 of 214 decks)
EDH data for Discerning Taste: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 214 real decks.

























































