Discerning Taste
Played in 179 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
All most relevant (30)
- Commune with Evil relevance 0.91 · 14.0% (25 of 179 decks)
- Grisly Salvage relevance 0.84 · 33.5% (60 of 179 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.71 · 12.3% (22 of 179 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.69 · 14.5% (26 of 179 decks)
- Forbidden Alchemy relevance 0.67 · 20.1% (36 of 179 decks)
- Cemetery Tampering relevance 0.60 · 14.0% (25 of 179 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.59 · 10.6% (19 of 179 decks)
- Zombify relevance 0.58 · 13.4% (24 of 179 decks)
- Ransack the Lab relevance 0.58 · 8.9% (16 of 179 decks)
- Skull Prophet relevance 0.57 · 27.4% (49 of 179 decks)
- Deadbridge Chant relevance 0.56 · 14.0% (25 of 179 decks)
- Akawalli, the Seething Tower relevance 0.55 · 9.5% (17 of 179 decks)
- Stargaze relevance 0.53 · 11.2% (20 of 179 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.52 · 11.2% (20 of 179 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.51 · 13.4% (24 of 179 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.51 · 30.2% (54 of 179 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.51 · 12.8% (23 of 179 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.51 · 12.8% (23 of 179 decks)
- Rakshasa's Bargain relevance 0.50 · 12.8% (23 of 179 decks)
- Eccentric Farmer relevance 0.49 · 7.8% (14 of 179 decks)
- Stitcher's Supplier relevance 0.49 · 24.6% (44 of 179 decks)
- Lotuslight Dancers relevance 0.47 · 14.5% (26 of 179 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.46 · 18.4% (33 of 179 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.45 · 9.5% (17 of 179 decks)
- Deathcap Marionette relevance 0.45 · 6.7% (12 of 179 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.44 · 11.2% (20 of 179 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.44 · 8.4% (15 of 179 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.44 · 19.6% (35 of 179 decks)
- Resentful Revelation relevance 0.43 · 7.8% (14 of 179 decks)
- Syr Konrad, the Grim relevance 0.43 · 22.9% (41 of 179 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Skull Prophet relevance 0.57 · 27.4% (49 of 179 decks)
- Akawalli, the Seething Tower relevance 0.55 · 9.5% (17 of 179 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.52 · 11.2% (20 of 179 decks)
- Eccentric Farmer relevance 0.49 · 7.8% (14 of 179 decks)
- Stitcher's Supplier relevance 0.49 · 24.6% (44 of 179 decks)
- Lotuslight Dancers relevance 0.47 · 14.5% (26 of 179 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.45 · 9.5% (17 of 179 decks)
- Deathcap Marionette relevance 0.45 · 6.7% (12 of 179 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.44 · 11.2% (20 of 179 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.44 · 8.4% (15 of 179 decks)
- Syr Konrad, the Grim relevance 0.43 · 22.9% (41 of 179 decks)
- Gyruda, Doom of Depths relevance 0.43 · 9.5% (17 of 179 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 0.42 · 15.6% (28 of 179 decks)
- Lord of Extinction relevance 0.41 · 14.5% (26 of 179 decks)
- Varragoth, Bloodsky Sire relevance 0.41 · 7.3% (13 of 179 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.43 · 13.4% (24 of 179 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Cemetery Tampering relevance 0.60 · 14.0% (25 of 179 decks)
- Deadbridge Chant relevance 0.56 · 14.0% (25 of 179 decks)
- Scion of Halaster relevance 0.42 · 6.7% (12 of 179 decks)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 0.40 · 20.7% (37 of 179 decks)
All instants (10)
- Grisly Salvage relevance 0.84 · 33.5% (60 of 179 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.71 · 12.3% (22 of 179 decks)
- Forbidden Alchemy relevance 0.67 · 20.1% (36 of 179 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.51 · 13.4% (24 of 179 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.51 · 12.8% (23 of 179 decks)
- Rakshasa's Bargain relevance 0.50 · 12.8% (23 of 179 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.46 · 18.4% (33 of 179 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.40 · 15.1% (27 of 179 decks)
- Bitter Triumph relevance 0.39 · 10.1% (18 of 179 decks)
- Cache Grab relevance 0.39 · 7.8% (14 of 179 decks)
All sorceries (14)
- Commune with Evil relevance 0.91 · 14.0% (25 of 179 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.69 · 14.5% (26 of 179 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.59 · 10.6% (19 of 179 decks)
- Zombify relevance 0.58 · 13.4% (24 of 179 decks)
- Ransack the Lab relevance 0.58 · 8.9% (16 of 179 decks)
- Stargaze relevance 0.53 · 11.2% (20 of 179 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.51 · 30.2% (54 of 179 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.51 · 12.8% (23 of 179 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.44 · 19.6% (35 of 179 decks)
- Resentful Revelation relevance 0.43 · 7.8% (14 of 179 decks)
- Singularity Rupture relevance 0.41 · 15.1% (27 of 179 decks)
- Living Death relevance 0.40 · 20.1% (36 of 179 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.39 · 21.8% (39 of 179 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.39 · 17.3% (31 of 179 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Foreboding Landscape relevance 0.45 · 27.9% (50 of 179 decks)
- Eden, Seat of the Sanctum relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (16 of 179 decks)
All lands (4)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.57 · 39.7% (71 of 179 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.46 · 16.2% (29 of 179 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.44 · 29.1% (52 of 179 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.40 · 19.6% (35 of 179 decks)
EDH data for Discerning Taste: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 179 real decks.