Counterlash
Played in 199 Azorius decks
630+2+48+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Whtz, the Bibliophile 1.6% of decks
Whtz, the Bibliophile 1.6% of decks
Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker 66.7% of decks
Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker 66.7% of decks
Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor 20.0% of decks
Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor 20.0% of decks
Far Traveler // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy 4.0% of decks
Far Traveler // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy 4.0% of decks
Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg // The Fifth Doctor 2.9% of decks
Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg // The Fifth Doctor 2.9% of decks
The Fifth Doctor // Adric, Mathematical Genius 1.8% of decks
The Fifth Doctor // Adric, Mathematical Genius 1.8% of decks
Most Relevant
Countermand 41.2% of decks
Countermand 41.2% of decks
Countervailing Winds 42.2% of decks
Countervailing Winds 42.2% of decks
Contradict 32.7% of decks
Contradict 32.7% of decks
Desertion 36.2% of decks
Desertion 36.2% of decks
Broken Concentration 29.6% of decks
Broken Concentration 29.6% of decks
Clash of Wills 29.1% of decks
Clash of Wills 29.1% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (6)
- Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 2.37 · 1.6% (100 of 6,370 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 1.33 · 66.7% (2 of 3 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.68 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Far Traveler // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.47 · 4.0% (1 of 25 decks)
- Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg // The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.43 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- The Fifth Doctor // Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.37 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Countermand relevance 2.67 · 41.2% (82 of 199 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 2.54 · 42.2% (84 of 199 decks)
- Contradict relevance 2.16 · 32.7% (65 of 199 decks)
- Desertion relevance 2.08 · 36.2% (72 of 199 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 2.05 · 29.6% (59 of 199 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 1.85 · 29.1% (58 of 199 decks)
- Complicate relevance 1.85 · 28.1% (56 of 199 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 1.84 · 32.2% (64 of 199 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 1.83 · 27.1% (54 of 199 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 1.79 · 31.7% (63 of 199 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 1.78 · 29.6% (59 of 199 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 1.78 · 29.1% (58 of 199 decks)
- Convolute relevance 1.77 · 31.2% (62 of 199 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 1.77 · 30.7% (61 of 199 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 1.71 · 28.6% (57 of 199 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 1.68 · 31.2% (62 of 199 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 1.67 · 26.6% (53 of 199 decks)
- Abjure relevance 1.66 · 31.7% (63 of 199 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 1.65 · 30.2% (60 of 199 decks)
- Cancel relevance 1.63 · 41.2% (82 of 199 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 1.62 · 23.6% (47 of 199 decks)
- Censor relevance 1.62 · 26.6% (53 of 199 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.61 · 33.7% (67 of 199 decks)
- Deprive relevance 1.59 · 27.1% (54 of 199 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 1.59 · 25.6% (51 of 199 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 1.59 · 23.6% (47 of 199 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 1.56 · 27.6% (55 of 199 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 1.54 · 37.7% (75 of 199 decks)
- Abstruse Interference relevance 1.54 · 24.1% (48 of 199 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 1.52 · 22.1% (44 of 199 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Counterbalance relevance 1.54 · 37.7% (75 of 199 decks)
- Declaration of Naught relevance 1.42 · 22.6% (45 of 199 decks)
All instants (48)
- Countermand relevance 2.67 · 41.2% (82 of 199 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 2.54 · 42.2% (84 of 199 decks)
- Contradict relevance 2.16 · 32.7% (65 of 199 decks)
- Desertion relevance 2.08 · 36.2% (72 of 199 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 2.05 · 29.6% (59 of 199 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 1.85 · 29.1% (58 of 199 decks)
- Complicate relevance 1.85 · 28.1% (56 of 199 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 1.84 · 32.2% (64 of 199 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 1.83 · 27.1% (54 of 199 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 1.79 · 31.7% (63 of 199 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 1.78 · 29.6% (59 of 199 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 1.78 · 29.1% (58 of 199 decks)
- Convolute relevance 1.77 · 31.2% (62 of 199 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 1.77 · 30.7% (61 of 199 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 1.71 · 28.6% (57 of 199 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 1.68 · 31.2% (62 of 199 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 1.67 · 26.6% (53 of 199 decks)
- Abjure relevance 1.66 · 31.7% (63 of 199 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 1.65 · 30.2% (60 of 199 decks)
- Cancel relevance 1.63 · 41.2% (82 of 199 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 1.62 · 23.6% (47 of 199 decks)
- Censor relevance 1.62 · 26.6% (53 of 199 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.61 · 33.7% (67 of 199 decks)
- Deprive relevance 1.59 · 27.1% (54 of 199 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 1.59 · 25.6% (51 of 199 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 1.59 · 23.6% (47 of 199 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 1.56 · 27.6% (55 of 199 decks)
- Abstruse Interference relevance 1.54 · 24.1% (48 of 199 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 1.52 · 22.1% (44 of 199 decks)
- Confound relevance 1.51 · 30.7% (61 of 199 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 1.49 · 23.1% (46 of 199 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 1.45 · 22.6% (45 of 199 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 1.44 · 21.1% (42 of 199 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 1.42 · 28.6% (57 of 199 decks)
- Access Denied relevance 1.42 · 36.7% (73 of 199 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 1.42 · 23.6% (47 of 199 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 1.41 · 34.7% (69 of 199 decks)
- Dissipate relevance 1.40 · 27.1% (54 of 199 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 1.39 · 24.6% (49 of 199 decks)
- Aethersnatch relevance 1.38 · 21.6% (43 of 199 decks)
- Didn't Say Please relevance 1.38 · 29.1% (58 of 199 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 1.36 · 23.6% (47 of 199 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 1.35 · 25.1% (50 of 199 decks)
- Complete the Circuit relevance 1.35 · 21.6% (43 of 199 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 1.34 · 25.6% (51 of 199 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 1.33 · 20.6% (41 of 199 decks)
- Fall of the Gavel relevance 1.33 · 21.1% (42 of 199 decks)
- Disallow relevance 1.31 · 33.7% (67 of 199 decks)
EDH data for Counterlash: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 199 real decks.




















