Desecration Plague
Played in 130 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (15)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.96 · 1.5% (4 of 275 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.89 · 1.1% (4 of 351 decks)
- Skanos Dragonheart // Master Chef relevance 0.82 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.76 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.62 · 1.3% (2 of 160 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Master Chef relevance 0.62 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.59 · 1.1% (2 of 187 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.51 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 0.46 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Flopsie, Bumi's Buddy relevance 0.43 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Captain Kathryn Janeway relevance 0.41 · 1.4% (1 of 69 decks)
- Bushmaster, Coiled Henchman relevance 0.39 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
- Shisato, Whispering Hunter relevance 0.39 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.39 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
- Ka-Zar of the Savage Land relevance 0.38 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Creeping Mold relevance 1.06 · 17.7% (23 of 130 decks)
- Plummet relevance 0.87 · 16.9% (22 of 130 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.87 · 28.5% (37 of 130 decks)
- Reclaiming Vines relevance 0.86 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.83 · 21.5% (28 of 130 decks)
- Font of Fertility relevance 0.73 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Defend the Hearth relevance 0.71 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Fade into Antiquity relevance 0.70 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 0.68 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Natural End relevance 0.63 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
- Bramblecrush relevance 0.63 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.62 · 19.2% (25 of 130 decks)
- Back to Nature relevance 0.61 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.57 · 14.6% (19 of 130 decks)
- Bountiful Harvest relevance 0.57 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Seek the Wilds relevance 0.57 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Market Festival relevance 0.54 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Urban Burgeoning relevance 0.54 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.53 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.53 · 18.5% (24 of 130 decks)
- Consign to Dust relevance 0.51 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Band Together relevance 0.51 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 0.50 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Sagu Wildling // Roost Seek relevance 0.49 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Hunter's Ambush relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Tajuru Pathwarden relevance 0.48 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Gift of Strength relevance 0.47 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Natural Connection relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Reviving Melody relevance 0.47 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.47 · 15.4% (20 of 130 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 0.68 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.57 · 14.6% (19 of 130 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.53 · 18.5% (24 of 130 decks)
- Sagu Wildling // Roost Seek relevance 0.49 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Tajuru Pathwarden relevance 0.48 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.47 · 15.4% (20 of 130 decks)
- Shaman of Spring relevance 0.46 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Kujar Seedsculptor relevance 0.46 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Golden Hind relevance 0.46 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 0.44 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Nessian Hornbeetle relevance 0.43 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Sagu Pummeler relevance 0.42 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Ambush Viper relevance 0.42 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Font of Fertility relevance 0.73 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Market Festival relevance 0.54 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Urban Burgeoning relevance 0.54 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.46 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.45 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
All instants (17)
- Plummet relevance 0.87 · 16.9% (22 of 130 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.87 · 28.5% (37 of 130 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.83 · 21.5% (28 of 130 decks)
- Defend the Hearth relevance 0.71 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Natural End relevance 0.63 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.62 · 19.2% (25 of 130 decks)
- Back to Nature relevance 0.61 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.53 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Consign to Dust relevance 0.51 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Band Together relevance 0.51 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Hunter's Ambush relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Gift of Strength relevance 0.47 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Natural Connection relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Pulse of Murasa relevance 0.44 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.43 · 24.6% (32 of 130 decks)
- Appetite for the Unnatural relevance 0.43 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.43 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
All sorceries (15)
- Creeping Mold relevance 1.06 · 17.7% (23 of 130 decks)
- Reclaiming Vines relevance 0.86 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Fade into Antiquity relevance 0.70 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Bramblecrush relevance 0.63 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
- Bountiful Harvest relevance 0.57 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Seek the Wilds relevance 0.57 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 0.50 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Reviving Melody relevance 0.47 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Time to Feed relevance 0.47 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Map the Wastes relevance 0.46 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.46 · 13.8% (18 of 130 decks)
- Crack Open relevance 0.44 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Atraxa's Fall relevance 0.44 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.43 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
- Peregrination relevance 0.43 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
EDH data for Desecration Plague: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 130 real decks.