Murasa Behemoth

Played in 56 Gruul decks

Murasa Behemoth
$0.10 €0.05

Color Identity Spread

Commanders

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All commanders (1)
  1. Guild Artisan // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.51 · 1.4% (1 of 69 decks)

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Greater Tanuki
    1.35 25.0%
    $0.29 €0.22
  • Seismic Monstrosaur
    1.18 23.2%
    $0.20 €0.12
  • Coliseum Behemoth
    1.08 21.4%
    $0.28 €0.11
  • Crash of Rhino Beetles
    1.01 16.1%
    $0.21 €0.11
  • Annoyed Altisaur
    1.01 26.8%
    $0.33 €0.15
  • Territorial Scythecat
    1.00 17.9%
    $0.23 €0.14
  • Oliphaunt
    0.97 23.2%
    $0.27 €4.07
  • Bedhead Beastie
    0.92 14.3%
    $0.12 €0.06
  • Winding Way
    0.91 14.3%
    $7.31 €1.23
  • Nylea's Forerunner
    0.90 19.6%
    $0.21 €0.14
All most relevant (30)
  1. Greater Tanuki relevance 1.35 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
  2. Seismic Monstrosaur relevance 1.18 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
  3. Coliseum Behemoth relevance 1.08 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
  4. Crash of Rhino Beetles relevance 1.01 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
  5. Annoyed Altisaur relevance 1.01 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
  6. Territorial Scythecat relevance 1.00 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
  7. Oliphaunt relevance 0.97 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
  8. Bedhead Beastie relevance 0.92 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
  9. Winding Way relevance 0.91 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
  10. Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.90 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
  11. Nyxborn Hydra relevance 0.89 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
  12. Generous Ent relevance 0.88 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
  13. Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 0.85 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
  14. Sporemound relevance 0.85 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
  15. Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.84 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
  16. Spitfire Lagac relevance 0.84 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
  17. Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 0.84 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
  18. Bushwhack relevance 0.81 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
  19. Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 0.79 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
  20. Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.78 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
  21. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.77 · 33.9% (19 of 56 decks)
  22. Sabotender relevance 0.76 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
  23. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.75 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
  24. Harrow relevance 0.68 · 30.4% (17 of 56 decks)
  25. Baloth Prime relevance 0.66 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
  26. Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.61 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
  27. Abrade relevance 0.56 · 30.4% (17 of 56 decks)
  28. Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.52 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
  29. Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.50 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
  30. Lightning Bolt relevance 0.39 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)

Creatures

23

Showing 1-10 of 23

Page size
  • Greater Tanuki
    1.35 25.0%
    $0.29 €0.22
  • Seismic Monstrosaur
    1.18 23.2%
    $0.20 €0.12
  • Coliseum Behemoth
    1.08 21.4%
    $0.28 €0.11
  • Crash of Rhino Beetles
    1.01 16.1%
    $0.21 €0.11
  • Annoyed Altisaur
    1.01 26.8%
    $0.33 €0.15
  • Territorial Scythecat
    1.00 17.9%
    $0.23 €0.14
  • Oliphaunt
    0.97 23.2%
    $0.27 €4.07
  • Bedhead Beastie
    0.92 14.3%
    $0.12 €0.06
  • Nylea's Forerunner
    0.90 19.6%
    $0.21 €0.14
  • Nyxborn Hydra
    0.89 19.6%
    $0.36 €0.29
All creatures (23)
  1. Greater Tanuki relevance 1.35 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
  2. Seismic Monstrosaur relevance 1.18 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
  3. Coliseum Behemoth relevance 1.08 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
  4. Crash of Rhino Beetles relevance 1.01 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
  5. Annoyed Altisaur relevance 1.01 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
  6. Territorial Scythecat relevance 1.00 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
  7. Oliphaunt relevance 0.97 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
  8. Bedhead Beastie relevance 0.92 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
  9. Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.90 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
  10. Nyxborn Hydra relevance 0.89 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
  11. Generous Ent relevance 0.88 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
  12. Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 0.85 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
  13. Sporemound relevance 0.85 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
  14. Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.84 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
  15. Spitfire Lagac relevance 0.84 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
  16. Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 0.84 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
  17. Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 0.79 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
  18. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.77 · 33.9% (19 of 56 decks)
  19. Sabotender relevance 0.76 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
  20. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.75 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
  21. Baloth Prime relevance 0.66 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
  22. Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.52 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
  23. Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.50 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)

Instants

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Harrow
    0.68 30.4%
    $0.33 €0.40
  • Snakeskin Veil
    0.61 28.6%
    $0.25 €0.10
  • Abrade
    0.56 30.4%
    $0.28 €0.17
  • Lightning Bolt
    0.39 16.1%
    $0.87 €2.11
  • Tamiyo's Safekeeping
    0.31 16.1%
    $4.95 €4.08
All instants (5)
  1. Harrow relevance 0.68 · 30.4% (17 of 56 decks)
  2. Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.61 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
  3. Abrade relevance 0.56 · 30.4% (17 of 56 decks)
  4. Lightning Bolt relevance 0.39 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
  5. Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.31 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)

Sorceries

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Winding Way
    0.91 14.3%
    $7.31 €1.23
  • Bushwhack
    0.81 26.8%
    $0.22 €0.21
  • Dance of the Tumbleweeds
    0.78 14.3%
    $0.21 €0.14
  • Explore
    0.36 19.6%
    $0.19 €0.25
All sorceries (4)
  1. Winding Way relevance 0.91 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
  2. Bushwhack relevance 0.81 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
  3. Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.78 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
  4. Explore relevance 0.36 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)

Utility Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Escape Tunnel
    0.63 17.9%
    $0.31 €0.10
  • Path of Ancestry
    0.38 21.4%
    $0.18 €0.12
All utility lands (2)
  1. Escape Tunnel relevance 0.63 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
  2. Path of Ancestry relevance 0.38 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)

Lands

10

Showing 1-10 of 10

Page size
  • Warped Landscape
    0.85 14.3%
    $0.27 €0.27
  • Evolving Wilds
    0.85 55.4%
    $0.29 €0.13
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    0.74 41.1%
    $0.28 €0.11
  • Shire Terrace
    0.66 14.3%
    $0.24 €0.11
  • Riveteers Overlook
    0.66 19.6%
    $0.30 €0.16
  • Rugged Highlands
    0.65 28.6%
    $0.28 €0.05
  • Cabaretti Courtyard
    0.65 19.6%
    $0.36 €0.35
  • Gruul Guildgate
    0.56 17.9%
    $0.16 €0.16
  • Thriving Grove
    0.54 14.3%
    $0.22 €0.07
  • Wooded Ridgeline
    0.44 19.6%
    $0.28 €0.21
All lands (10)
  1. Warped Landscape relevance 0.85 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
  2. Evolving Wilds relevance 0.85 · 55.4% (31 of 56 decks)
  3. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.74 · 41.1% (23 of 56 decks)
  4. Shire Terrace relevance 0.66 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
  5. Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.66 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
  6. Rugged Highlands relevance 0.65 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
  7. Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.65 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
  8. Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.56 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
  9. Thriving Grove relevance 0.54 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
  10. Wooded Ridgeline relevance 0.44 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)

EDH data for Murasa Behemoth: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 56 real decks.