Flame Sweep
Played in 67 Grixis decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (1)
- Garza Zol, Plague Queen relevance 0.52 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Final Parting relevance 1.61 · 35.8% (24 of 67 decks)
- Dispel relevance 1.49 · 43.3% (29 of 67 decks)
- Pyroclasm relevance 1.38 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Yusri, Fortune's Flame relevance 1.37 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Glamer Gifter relevance 1.22 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 1.20 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 1.17 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 1.13 · 35.8% (24 of 67 decks)
- Unearth relevance 1.12 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Strike It Rich relevance 1.09 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Impulse relevance 1.08 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 1.05 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.99 · 40.3% (27 of 67 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.99 · 61.2% (41 of 67 decks)
- Azra Oddsmaker relevance 0.97 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.95 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.93 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Fervent Mastery relevance 0.92 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 0.91 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Trickery Charm relevance 0.91 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.90 · 38.8% (26 of 67 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.90 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Ghostly Pilferer relevance 0.89 · 25.4% (17 of 67 decks)
- Drown in the Loch relevance 0.88 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Spyglass Siren relevance 0.88 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.87 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Price of Fame relevance 0.87 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- By Force relevance 0.86 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Mystical Dispute relevance 0.85 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Goldhound relevance 0.84 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Yusri, Fortune's Flame relevance 1.37 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Glamer Gifter relevance 1.22 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Azra Oddsmaker relevance 0.97 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Ghostly Pilferer relevance 0.89 · 25.4% (17 of 67 decks)
- Spyglass Siren relevance 0.88 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Goldhound relevance 0.84 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Lightning-Rig Crew relevance 0.80 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 0.78 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Vohar, Vodalian Desecrator relevance 0.78 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Mayhem Devil relevance 0.77 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Blood Pet relevance 0.76 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.76 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Weftstalker Ardent relevance 0.75 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.99 · 40.3% (27 of 67 decks)
All instants (19)
- Dispel relevance 1.49 · 43.3% (29 of 67 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 1.20 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 1.17 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 1.13 · 35.8% (24 of 67 decks)
- Impulse relevance 1.08 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 1.05 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.99 · 61.2% (41 of 67 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.95 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.93 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 0.91 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Trickery Charm relevance 0.91 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.90 · 38.8% (26 of 67 decks)
- Drown in the Loch relevance 0.88 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.87 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Price of Fame relevance 0.87 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Mystical Dispute relevance 0.85 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Ricochet Trap relevance 0.82 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.81 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 0.74 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Final Parting relevance 1.61 · 35.8% (24 of 67 decks)
- Pyroclasm relevance 1.38 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Unearth relevance 1.12 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Strike It Rich relevance 1.09 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Fervent Mastery relevance 0.92 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.90 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- By Force relevance 0.86 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Dimir Machinations relevance 0.80 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.77 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.77 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Ashiok, Dream Render relevance 0.79 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Ash Barrens relevance 1.40 · 44.8% (30 of 67 decks)
- Barbarian Ring relevance 1.36 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.97 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Seething Landscape relevance 0.90 · 41.8% (28 of 67 decks)
All lands (2)
- Spire of Industry relevance 1.07 · 34.3% (23 of 67 decks)
- Shivan Reef relevance 0.75 · 61.2% (41 of 67 decks)
EDH data for Flame Sweep: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 67 real decks.