Chaos Maw
Played in 127 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
530+40+8+1+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Thromok the Insatiable relevance 1.70 · 1.3% (18 of 1,383 decks)
- Ulasht, the Hate Seed relevance 1.53 · 2.1% (9 of 422 decks)
- Rhino, Barreling Brute relevance 0.90 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Borborygmos relevance 0.65 · 1.4% (2 of 141 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Guild Artisan relevance 0.53 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Crater Hellion relevance 1.91 · 28.3% (36 of 127 decks)
- Tectonic Hellion relevance 1.44 · 21.3% (27 of 127 decks)
- Molten Monstrosity relevance 1.22 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Riftburst Hellion relevance 1.14 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.88 · 26.0% (33 of 127 decks)
- Rhino, Barreling Brute relevance 0.86 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Ulasht, the Hate Seed relevance 0.78 · 16.5% (21 of 127 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.77 · 22.8% (29 of 127 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 0.71 · 17.3% (22 of 127 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.69 · 22.0% (28 of 127 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.69 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 0.69 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.68 · 21.3% (27 of 127 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.68 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.66 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.66 · 17.3% (22 of 127 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.63 · 12.6% (16 of 127 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.61 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Thromok the Insatiable relevance 0.59 · 8.7% (11 of 127 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.58 · 20.5% (26 of 127 decks)
- Trumpeting Carnosaur relevance 0.57 · 16.5% (21 of 127 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.56 · 18.1% (23 of 127 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.56 · 29.9% (38 of 127 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.55 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.55 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.55 · 22.8% (29 of 127 decks)
- Ravager Wurm relevance 0.55 · 10.2% (13 of 127 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.54 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.52 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.51 · 16.5% (21 of 127 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Crater Hellion relevance 1.91 · 28.3% (36 of 127 decks)
- Tectonic Hellion relevance 1.44 · 21.3% (27 of 127 decks)
- Molten Monstrosity relevance 1.22 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Riftburst Hellion relevance 1.14 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.88 · 26.0% (33 of 127 decks)
- Rhino, Barreling Brute relevance 0.86 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Ulasht, the Hate Seed relevance 0.78 · 16.5% (21 of 127 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.77 · 22.8% (29 of 127 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 0.71 · 17.3% (22 of 127 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.69 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 0.69 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.68 · 21.3% (27 of 127 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.68 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.66 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.66 · 17.3% (22 of 127 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.63 · 12.6% (16 of 127 decks)
- Thromok the Insatiable relevance 0.59 · 8.7% (11 of 127 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.58 · 20.5% (26 of 127 decks)
- Trumpeting Carnosaur relevance 0.57 · 16.5% (21 of 127 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.56 · 29.9% (38 of 127 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.55 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.55 · 22.8% (29 of 127 decks)
- Ravager Wurm relevance 0.55 · 10.2% (13 of 127 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.52 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.51 · 16.5% (21 of 127 decks)
- Magmatic Force relevance 0.50 · 8.7% (11 of 127 decks)
- Burning Sun's Avatar relevance 0.50 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- Kogla and Yidaro relevance 0.50 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Stalking Vengeance relevance 0.49 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Sunder Shaman relevance 0.49 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.49 · 10.2% (13 of 127 decks)
- Thunder Dragon relevance 0.48 · 7.1% (9 of 127 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.48 · 16.5% (21 of 127 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.47 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
- Cyclops of Eternal Fury relevance 0.47 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 0.47 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.47 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.46 · 11.8% (15 of 127 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.46 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.69 · 22.0% (28 of 127 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.61 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.56 · 18.1% (23 of 127 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.54 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
- Fungal Sprouting relevance 0.50 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- New Generation's Technique relevance 0.49 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.46 · 12.6% (16 of 127 decks)
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.55 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
All lands (1)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.47 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
EDH data for Chaos Maw: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 127 real decks.

































